Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
33
CHNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$4.04
Seasonality move
:
42.54%
Day range:
$3.70 - $4.14
52-week range:
$3.16 - $8.20
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
26.18x
P/B ratio:
0.30x
Volume:
31.6K
Avg. volume:
19.9K
1-year change:
-15.12%
Market cap:
$5M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HUIHY
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
INHD
Inno Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LMPMY
Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUD
Luda Technology Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MOAEF
Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
|
$4.08 | -- | $5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 26.18x |
|
HUIHY
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
$14.60 | -- | $943.1M | 62.17x | $0.28 | 0.53% | 1.99x |
|
INHD
Inno Holdings, Inc.
|
$0.15 | -- | $1.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.25x |
|
LMPMY
Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.
|
$4.35 | -- | $1.9B | 10.67x | $0.08 | 3.27% | 0.57x |
|
LUD
Luda Technology Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MOAEF
Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.
|
$0.07 | -- | $13.3M | 0.06x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
|
-- | 0.108 | -- | -- |
|
HUIHY
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
1.74% | 0.107 | -- | 7.34x |
|
INHD
Inno Holdings, Inc.
|
0.6% | -2.569 | 0.46% | 4.98x |
|
LMPMY
Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.
|
43.18% | 0.359 | -- | 0.63x |
|
LUD
Luda Technology Group
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
MOAEF
Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.
|
401.01% | 0.903 | -- | 0.19x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HUIHY
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.74% | 0.76% | -- | -- |
|
INHD
Inno Holdings, Inc.
|
-$16K | -$1.6M | -94.91% | -97.17% | -143.68% | -$594.8K |
|
LMPMY
Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.73% | 4.87% | -- | -- |
|
LUD
Luda Technology Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MOAEF
Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -68.67% | -- | -- | -- |
China Natural Resources, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CHNR or HUIHY?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Natural Resources, Inc.'s net margin of --. China Natural Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.-- -- -- HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.-- -- $2B -
What do Analysts Say About CHNR or HUIHY?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Natural Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Huabao International Holdings Ltd., analysts believe China Natural Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Huabao International Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.0 0 0 HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CHNR or HUIHY More Risky?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.104, which suggesting that the stock is 89.592% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.335, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.531%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHNR or HUIHY?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Huabao International Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. China Natural Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Huabao International Holdings Ltd. pays out 54.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHNR or HUIHY?
China Natural Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Huabao International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Natural Resources, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Natural Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 62.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Natural Resources, Inc. is 26.18x versus 1.99x for Huabao International Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.26.18x -- -- -- HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.1.99x 62.17x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHNR or INHD?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China Natural Resources, Inc.'s net margin of -142.36%. China Natural Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Inno Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -97.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.-- -- -- INHDInno Holdings, Inc.-1.47% -$0.30 $8.3M -
What do Analysts Say About CHNR or INHD?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inno Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Natural Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Inno Holdings, Inc., analysts believe China Natural Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Inno Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.0 0 0 INHDInno Holdings, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CHNR or INHD More Risky?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.104, which suggesting that the stock is 89.592% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inno Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHNR or INHD?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inno Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Natural Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inno Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHNR or INHD?
China Natural Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Inno Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1M. China Natural Resources, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Inno Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, China Natural Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inno Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Natural Resources, Inc. is 26.18x versus 0.25x for Inno Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.26.18x -- -- -- INHDInno Holdings, Inc.0.25x -- $1.1M -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CHNR or LMPMY?
Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Natural Resources, Inc.'s net margin of --. China Natural Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.-- -- -- LMPMYLee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.-- -- $6.5B -
What do Analysts Say About CHNR or LMPMY?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Natural Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd., analysts believe China Natural Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.0 0 0 LMPMYLee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CHNR or LMPMY More Risky?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.104, which suggesting that the stock is 89.592% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd. has a beta of 0.358, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.208%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHNR or LMPMY?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd. offers a yield of 3.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. China Natural Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd. pays out 29.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHNR or LMPMY?
China Natural Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Natural Resources, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Natural Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Natural Resources, Inc. is 26.18x versus 0.57x for Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.26.18x -- -- -- LMPMYLee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.0.57x 10.67x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHNR or LUD?
Luda Technology Group has a net margin of -- compared to China Natural Resources, Inc.'s net margin of --. China Natural Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Luda Technology Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.-- -- -- LUDLuda Technology Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CHNR or LUD?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Luda Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Natural Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Luda Technology Group, analysts believe China Natural Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Luda Technology Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.0 0 0 LUDLuda Technology Group0 0 0 -
Is CHNR or LUD More Risky?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.104, which suggesting that the stock is 89.592% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luda Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHNR or LUD?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luda Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Natural Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luda Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHNR or LUD?
China Natural Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Luda Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. China Natural Resources, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Luda Technology Group's net income of --. Notably, China Natural Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luda Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Natural Resources, Inc. is 26.18x versus -- for Luda Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.26.18x -- -- -- LUDLuda Technology Group-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHNR or MOAEF?
Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Natural Resources, Inc.'s net margin of --. China Natural Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.-- -- -- MOAEFMongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.-- -- $174.1M -
What do Analysts Say About CHNR or MOAEF?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Natural Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd., analysts believe China Natural Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.0 0 0 MOAEFMongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CHNR or MOAEF More Risky?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.104, which suggesting that the stock is 89.592% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.230, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.031%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHNR or MOAEF?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Natural Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHNR or MOAEF?
China Natural Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Natural Resources, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Natural Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Natural Resources, Inc. is 26.18x versus 0.05x for Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.26.18x -- -- -- MOAEFMongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.0.05x 0.06x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
