Financhill
Sell
38

CHNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.58
Seasonality move :
1.6%
Day range:
$0.51 - $0.66
52-week range:
$0.45 - $1.13
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
30.77x
P/B ratio:
0.42x
Volume:
251.7K
Avg. volume:
19.1K
1-year change:
-40.94%
Market cap:
$5.5M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CHNR
China Natural Resources
-- -- -- -- --
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
HIHO
Highway Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
-- -- -- -- --
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
-- -- -- -- --
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CHNR
China Natural Resources
$0.56 -- $5.5M -- $0.00 0% 30.77x
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
$1.10 -- $8.4M 11.00x $0.08 0% 0.55x
HIHO
Highway Holdings
$1.80 -- $7.9M -- $0.05 6.67% 1.09x
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
$0.51 -- $10.5M -- $0.00 0% 1.22x
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
$2.10 -- $32.7M -- $0.00 0% 26.39x
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
$0.17 -- $2.6M 98.50x $0.00 0% 0.51x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CHNR
China Natural Resources
-- -1.345 -- --
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
-- 1.433 -- 1.59x
HIHO
Highway Holdings
-- 0.202 0.78% 2.03x
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
2.59% 2.328 5.34% 1.88x
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
-- -4.128 -- 6.29x
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
0.03% 13.742 22.6% 1.76x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CHNR
China Natural Resources
-- -- -- -- -- --
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
-- -- 13.66% 13.71% -- --
HIHO
Highway Holdings
$670K $4K -11.12% -11.12% 0.21% --
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
-- -- -17.65% -18.39% -- --
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
-- -- -55.86% -55.86% -- --
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
-- -- 0.01% 0.01% -- --

China Natural Resources vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CHNR or CLWT?

    Euro Tech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to China Natural Resources's net margin of --. China Natural Resources's return on equity of -- beat Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of 13.71%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CHNR
    China Natural Resources
    -- -- --
    CLWT
    Euro Tech Holdings
    -- -- $15.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About CHNR or CLWT?

    China Natural Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Natural Resources has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings, analysts believe China Natural Resources is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CHNR
    China Natural Resources
    0 0 0
    CLWT
    Euro Tech Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is CHNR or CLWT More Risky?

    China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.255, which suggesting that the stock is 74.451% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.739%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHNR or CLWT?

    China Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Euro Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. China Natural Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings pays out 84.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CHNR or CLWT?

    China Natural Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of --. China Natural Resources's net income of -- is lower than Euro Tech Holdings's net income of --. Notably, China Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Euro Tech Holdings's PE ratio is 11.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Natural Resources is 30.77x versus 0.55x for Euro Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CHNR
    China Natural Resources
    30.77x -- -- --
    CLWT
    Euro Tech Holdings
    0.55x 11.00x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CHNR or HIHO?

    Highway Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to China Natural Resources's net margin of 4.77%. China Natural Resources's return on equity of -- beat Highway Holdings's return on equity of -11.12%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CHNR
    China Natural Resources
    -- -- --
    HIHO
    Highway Holdings
    34.73% $0.02 $6.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About CHNR or HIHO?

    China Natural Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Natural Resources has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings, analysts believe China Natural Resources is more attractive than Highway Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CHNR
    China Natural Resources
    0 0 0
    HIHO
    Highway Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is CHNR or HIHO More Risky?

    China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.255, which suggesting that the stock is 74.451% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.227, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.299%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHNR or HIHO?

    China Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Highway Holdings offers a yield of 6.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. China Natural Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings pays out -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CHNR or HIHO?

    China Natural Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.9M. China Natural Resources's net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings's net income of $92K. Notably, China Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Highway Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Natural Resources is 30.77x versus 1.09x for Highway Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CHNR
    China Natural Resources
    30.77x -- -- --
    HIHO
    Highway Holdings
    1.09x -- $1.9M $92K
  • Which has Higher Returns CHNR or ILAG?

    Intelligent Living Application Group has a net margin of -- compared to China Natural Resources's net margin of --. China Natural Resources's return on equity of -- beat Intelligent Living Application Group's return on equity of -18.39%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CHNR
    China Natural Resources
    -- -- --
    ILAG
    Intelligent Living Application Group
    -- -- $14.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About CHNR or ILAG?

    China Natural Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Natural Resources has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, analysts believe China Natural Resources is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CHNR
    China Natural Resources
    0 0 0
    ILAG
    Intelligent Living Application Group
    0 0 0
  • Is CHNR or ILAG More Risky?

    China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.255, which suggesting that the stock is 74.451% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHNR or ILAG?

    China Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intelligent Living Application Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Natural Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CHNR or ILAG?

    China Natural Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group quarterly revenues of --. China Natural Resources's net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group's net income of --. Notably, China Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intelligent Living Application Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Natural Resources is 30.77x versus 1.22x for Intelligent Living Application Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CHNR
    China Natural Resources
    30.77x -- -- --
    ILAG
    Intelligent Living Application Group
    1.22x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CHNR or ROMA?

    Roma Green Finance has a net margin of -- compared to China Natural Resources's net margin of --. China Natural Resources's return on equity of -- beat Roma Green Finance's return on equity of -55.86%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CHNR
    China Natural Resources
    -- -- --
    ROMA
    Roma Green Finance
    -- -- $7.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About CHNR or ROMA?

    China Natural Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roma Green Finance has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Natural Resources has higher upside potential than Roma Green Finance, analysts believe China Natural Resources is more attractive than Roma Green Finance.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CHNR
    China Natural Resources
    0 0 0
    ROMA
    Roma Green Finance
    0 0 0
  • Is CHNR or ROMA More Risky?

    China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.255, which suggesting that the stock is 74.451% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roma Green Finance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHNR or ROMA?

    China Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Roma Green Finance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Natural Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roma Green Finance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CHNR or ROMA?

    China Natural Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roma Green Finance quarterly revenues of --. China Natural Resources's net income of -- is lower than Roma Green Finance's net income of --. Notably, China Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Roma Green Finance's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Natural Resources is 30.77x versus 26.39x for Roma Green Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CHNR
    China Natural Resources
    30.77x -- -- --
    ROMA
    Roma Green Finance
    26.39x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CHNR or WLGS?

    WANG & LEE Group has a net margin of -- compared to China Natural Resources's net margin of --. China Natural Resources's return on equity of -- beat WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of 0.01%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CHNR
    China Natural Resources
    -- -- --
    WLGS
    WANG & LEE Group
    -- -- $8.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About CHNR or WLGS?

    China Natural Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WANG & LEE Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Natural Resources has higher upside potential than WANG & LEE Group, analysts believe China Natural Resources is more attractive than WANG & LEE Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CHNR
    China Natural Resources
    0 0 0
    WLGS
    WANG & LEE Group
    0 0 0
  • Is CHNR or WLGS More Risky?

    China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.255, which suggesting that the stock is 74.451% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHNR or WLGS?

    China Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WANG & LEE Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Natural Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WANG & LEE Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CHNR or WLGS?

    China Natural Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues of --. China Natural Resources's net income of -- is lower than WANG & LEE Group's net income of --. Notably, China Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WANG & LEE Group's PE ratio is 98.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Natural Resources is 30.77x versus 0.51x for WANG & LEE Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CHNR
    China Natural Resources
    30.77x -- -- --
    WLGS
    WANG & LEE Group
    0.51x 98.50x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Enovix an Underrated Small Cap?
Is Enovix an Underrated Small Cap?

Enovix (NASDAQ:ENVX) is one of several small, innovative companies hoping…

Are We Heading Toward a Recession?
Are We Heading Toward a Recession?

Fears of a recession in 2025 grew at the end…

3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now
3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now

The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.3% during the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 12

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 33.33% over the past day.

Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 12

Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is down 8.89% over the past day.

Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 12

Onto Innovation [ONTO] is up 4.75% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock