Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Buy
66
SNFRF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.14
Seasonality move
:
17.77%
Day range:
$0.14 - $0.14
52-week range:
$0.10 - $0.16
Dividend yield:
4.48%
P/E ratio:
10.53x
P/S ratio:
0.32x
P/B ratio:
0.69x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
500
1-year change:
36.48%
Market cap:
$985.5M
Revenue:
$3.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.01
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNFRF
Sinofert Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CARCY
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHYI
Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRFX
Graphex Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LKSGF
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XYIGY
Xinyi Glass Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNFRF
Sinofert Holdings
|
$0.14 | -- | $985.5M | 10.53x | $0.01 | 4.48% | 0.32x |
|
CARCY
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings
|
$5.85 | -- | $1.4B | 3.86x | $0.08 | 1.71% | 0.33x |
|
CHYI
Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings
|
$0.5500 | -- | $174.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GRFX
Graphex Group
|
$0.27 | -- | $13.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.39x |
|
LKSGF
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings)
|
$0.09 | -- | $42.7M | -- | $0.00 | 6.03% | 0.83x |
|
XYIGY
Xinyi Glass Holdings
|
$20.12 | -- | $4.3B | 5.55x | $0.80 | 8.67% | 1.27x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNFRF
Sinofert Holdings
|
14.38% | 1.260 | 37.6% | 0.85x |
|
CARCY
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings
|
-- | -0.957 | -- | -- |
|
CHYI
Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings
|
-- | 50.311 | -- | -- |
|
GRFX
Graphex Group
|
39.73% | 1.808 | 156.58% | 0.69x |
|
LKSGF
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings)
|
-- | -0.705 | -- | 4.59x |
|
XYIGY
Xinyi Glass Holdings
|
16.57% | 0.248 | 19.87% | 0.72x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNFRF
Sinofert Holdings
|
-- | -- | 5.58% | 6.54% | -- | -- |
|
CARCY
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings
|
$119.1M | $39.8M | 5.43% | -- | 6.64% | -- |
|
CHYI
Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRFX
Graphex Group
|
-- | -- | -21.49% | -36.3% | -- | -- |
|
LKSGF
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings)
|
-- | -- | -3.85% | -3.89% | -- | -- |
|
XYIGY
Xinyi Glass Holdings
|
-- | -- | 13.56% | 17.26% | -- | -- |
Sinofert Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SNFRF or CARCY?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Sinofert Holdings's net margin of 2.61%. Sinofert Holdings's return on equity of 6.54% beat China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNFRFSinofert Holdings-- -- $1.7B CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings15.61% $0.08 -- -
What do Analysts Say About SNFRF or CARCY?
Sinofert Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinofert Holdings has higher upside potential than China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings, analysts believe Sinofert Holdings is more attractive than China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNFRFSinofert Holdings0 0 0 CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings0 0 0 -
Is SNFRF or CARCY More Risky?
Sinofert Holdings has a beta of 0.111, which suggesting that the stock is 88.909% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a beta of 0.069, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.095%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNFRF or CARCY?
Sinofert Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Sinofert Holdings pays 65.04% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings pays out 49.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNFRF or CARCY?
Sinofert Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings quarterly revenues of $763M. Sinofert Holdings's net income of -- is lower than China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's net income of $19.9M. Notably, Sinofert Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's PE ratio is 3.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinofert Holdings is 0.32x versus 0.33x for China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNFRFSinofert Holdings0.32x 10.53x -- -- CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings0.33x 3.86x $763M $19.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns SNFRF or CHYI?
Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Sinofert Holdings's net margin of --. Sinofert Holdings's return on equity of 6.54% beat Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNFRFSinofert Holdings-- -- $1.7B CHYIChykingyoung Investment Development Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SNFRF or CHYI?
Sinofert Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinofert Holdings has higher upside potential than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, analysts believe Sinofert Holdings is more attractive than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNFRFSinofert Holdings0 0 0 CHYIChykingyoung Investment Development Holdings0 0 0 -
Is SNFRF or CHYI More Risky?
Sinofert Holdings has a beta of 0.111, which suggesting that the stock is 88.909% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has a beta of 4.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 317.491%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNFRF or CHYI?
Sinofert Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinofert Holdings pays 65.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinofert Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNFRF or CHYI?
Sinofert Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Sinofert Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Sinofert Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinofert Holdings is 0.32x versus -- for Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNFRFSinofert Holdings0.32x 10.53x -- -- CHYIChykingyoung Investment Development Holdings-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNFRF or GRFX?
Graphex Group has a net margin of -- compared to Sinofert Holdings's net margin of --. Sinofert Holdings's return on equity of 6.54% beat Graphex Group's return on equity of -36.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNFRFSinofert Holdings-- -- $1.7B GRFXGraphex Group-- -- $70M -
What do Analysts Say About SNFRF or GRFX?
Sinofert Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Graphex Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.63%. Given that Graphex Group has higher upside potential than Sinofert Holdings, analysts believe Graphex Group is more attractive than Sinofert Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNFRFSinofert Holdings0 0 0 GRFXGraphex Group0 0 0 -
Is SNFRF or GRFX More Risky?
Sinofert Holdings has a beta of 0.111, which suggesting that the stock is 88.909% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graphex Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNFRF or GRFX?
Sinofert Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. Graphex Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinofert Holdings pays 65.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Graphex Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinofert Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNFRF or GRFX?
Sinofert Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Graphex Group quarterly revenues of --. Sinofert Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Graphex Group's net income of --. Notably, Sinofert Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while Graphex Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinofert Holdings is 0.32x versus 0.39x for Graphex Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNFRFSinofert Holdings0.32x 10.53x -- -- GRFXGraphex Group0.39x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNFRF or LKSGF?
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) has a net margin of -- compared to Sinofert Holdings's net margin of --. Sinofert Holdings's return on equity of 6.54% beat Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings)'s return on equity of -3.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNFRFSinofert Holdings-- -- $1.7B LKSGFLuks Group (Vietnam Holdings)-- -- $298M -
What do Analysts Say About SNFRF or LKSGF?
Sinofert Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinofert Holdings has higher upside potential than Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings), analysts believe Sinofert Holdings is more attractive than Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNFRFSinofert Holdings0 0 0 LKSGFLuks Group (Vietnam Holdings)0 0 0 -
Is SNFRF or LKSGF More Risky?
Sinofert Holdings has a beta of 0.111, which suggesting that the stock is 88.909% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) has a beta of 0.295, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.533%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNFRF or LKSGF?
Sinofert Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) offers a yield of 6.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinofert Holdings pays 65.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) pays out -20.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinofert Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNFRF or LKSGF?
Sinofert Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) quarterly revenues of --. Sinofert Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings)'s net income of --. Notably, Sinofert Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinofert Holdings is 0.32x versus 0.83x for Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNFRFSinofert Holdings0.32x 10.53x -- -- LKSGFLuks Group (Vietnam Holdings)0.83x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNFRF or XYIGY?
Xinyi Glass Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Sinofert Holdings's net margin of --. Sinofert Holdings's return on equity of 6.54% beat Xinyi Glass Holdings's return on equity of 17.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNFRFSinofert Holdings-- -- $1.7B XYIGYXinyi Glass Holdings-- -- $5.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SNFRF or XYIGY?
Sinofert Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xinyi Glass Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinofert Holdings has higher upside potential than Xinyi Glass Holdings, analysts believe Sinofert Holdings is more attractive than Xinyi Glass Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNFRFSinofert Holdings0 0 0 XYIGYXinyi Glass Holdings0 0 0 -
Is SNFRF or XYIGY More Risky?
Sinofert Holdings has a beta of 0.111, which suggesting that the stock is 88.909% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xinyi Glass Holdings has a beta of 0.529, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.062%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNFRF or XYIGY?
Sinofert Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. Xinyi Glass Holdings offers a yield of 8.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Sinofert Holdings pays 65.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Xinyi Glass Holdings pays out 17.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNFRF or XYIGY?
Sinofert Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xinyi Glass Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Sinofert Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Xinyi Glass Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Sinofert Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while Xinyi Glass Holdings's PE ratio is 5.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinofert Holdings is 0.32x versus 1.27x for Xinyi Glass Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNFRFSinofert Holdings0.32x 10.53x -- -- XYIGYXinyi Glass Holdings1.27x 5.55x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 25
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 25
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 25
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 15.37% over the past day.
