Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
52
SNFRF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.21
Seasonality move
:
-4.08%
Day range:
$0.21 - $0.21
52-week range:
$0.14 - $0.24
Dividend yield:
3.46%
P/E ratio:
10.90x
P/S ratio:
0.48x
P/B ratio:
0.81x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
347
1-year change:
48.46%
Market cap:
$1.5B
Revenue:
$3B
EPS (TTM):
$0.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNFRF
Sinofert Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CARCY
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HUABF
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LKSGF
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VSFFF
Green Economy Development Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XYIGY
Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNFRF
Sinofert Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.21 | -- | $1.5B | 10.90x | $0.00 | 3.46% | 0.48x |
|
CARCY
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.
|
$5.72 | -- | $1.3B | 41.45x | $0.05 | 1.61% | 0.43x |
|
HUABF
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.50 | -- | $1.6B | 54.29x | $0.01 | 0.31% | 3.42x |
|
LKSGF
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.
|
$0.10 | -- | $51.3M | 17.89x | $0.00 | 5.03% | 1.13x |
|
VSFFF
Green Economy Development Ltd.
|
$0.07 | -- | $44.8M | 19.46x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.13x |
|
XYIGY
Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.
|
$26.24 | -- | $5.7B | 9.18x | $0.32 | 2.2% | 1.97x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNFRF
Sinofert Holdings Ltd.
|
14.85% | 1.768 | -- | 0.65x |
|
CARCY
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.
|
26.44% | -0.031 | 126.41% | 0.45x |
|
HUABF
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
1.74% | 2.790 | -- | 7.34x |
|
LKSGF
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -12.462 | -- | 5.04x |
|
VSFFF
Green Economy Development Ltd.
|
59.7% | 0.000 | -- | 1.11x |
|
XYIGY
Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.
|
17.58% | 0.529 | -- | 0.74x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNFRF
Sinofert Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 8.76% | 10.26% | -- | -- |
|
CARCY
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.
|
$92.6M | $7.9M | 0.02% | 0.03% | 1.16% | -- |
|
HUABF
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.74% | 0.76% | -- | -- |
|
LKSGF
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.82% | 0.82% | -- | -- |
|
VSFFF
Green Economy Development Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 10.34% | 31.1% | -- | -- |
|
XYIGY
Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 7.84% | 9.51% | -- | -- |
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SNFRF or CARCY?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -0.17%. Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.26% beat China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.-- -- $1.7B CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.13.63% $0.01 $8.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SNFRF or CARCY?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Sinofert Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNFRF or CARCY More Risky?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 92.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.010, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.956%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNFRF or CARCY?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Sinofert Holdings Ltd. pays 34.85% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. pays out 73.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNFRF or CARCY?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $679.6M. Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.90x while China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 41.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinofert Holdings Ltd. is 0.48x versus 0.43x for China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.0.48x 10.90x -- -- CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.0.43x 41.45x $679.6M -$1.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns SNFRF or HUABF?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.26% beat Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.-- -- $1.7B HUABFHuabao International Holdings Ltd.-- -- $2B -
What do Analysts Say About SNFRF or HUABF?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Huabao International Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Sinofert Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Huabao International Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 HUABFHuabao International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNFRF or HUABF More Risky?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 92.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.455, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.489%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNFRF or HUABF?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Huabao International Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Sinofert Holdings Ltd. pays 34.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Huabao International Holdings Ltd. pays out 54.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNFRF or HUABF?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Huabao International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.90x while Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 54.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinofert Holdings Ltd. is 0.48x versus 3.42x for Huabao International Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.0.48x 10.90x -- -- HUABFHuabao International Holdings Ltd.3.42x 54.29x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNFRF or LKSGF?
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.26% beat Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.-- -- $1.7B LKSGFLuks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.-- -- $295.5M -
What do Analysts Say About SNFRF or LKSGF?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd., analysts believe Sinofert Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 LKSGFLuks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNFRF or LKSGF More Risky?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 92.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.614, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 161.434%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNFRF or LKSGF?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinofert Holdings Ltd. pays 34.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd. pays out 104.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNFRF or LKSGF?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.90x while Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinofert Holdings Ltd. is 0.48x versus 1.13x for Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.0.48x 10.90x -- -- LKSGFLuks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.1.13x 17.89x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNFRF or VSFFF?
Green Economy Development Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.26% beat Green Economy Development Ltd.'s return on equity of 31.1%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.-- -- $1.7B VSFFFGreen Economy Development Ltd.-- -- $44.2M -
What do Analysts Say About SNFRF or VSFFF?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Green Economy Development Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Green Economy Development Ltd., analysts believe Sinofert Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Green Economy Development Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 VSFFFGreen Economy Development Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNFRF or VSFFF More Risky?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 92.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Economy Development Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNFRF or VSFFF?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Green Economy Development Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinofert Holdings Ltd. pays 34.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Economy Development Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNFRF or VSFFF?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Green Economy Development Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Green Economy Development Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.90x while Green Economy Development Ltd.'s PE ratio is 19.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinofert Holdings Ltd. is 0.48x versus 0.13x for Green Economy Development Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.0.48x 10.90x -- -- VSFFFGreen Economy Development Ltd.0.13x 19.46x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNFRF or XYIGY?
Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.26% beat Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.-- -- $1.7B XYIGYXinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.-- -- $5.4B -
What do Analysts Say About SNFRF or XYIGY?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Sinofert Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 XYIGYXinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNFRF or XYIGY More Risky?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 92.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.552, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.788%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNFRF or XYIGY?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Sinofert Holdings Ltd. pays 34.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd. pays out 43.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNFRF or XYIGY?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.90x while Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinofert Holdings Ltd. is 0.48x versus 1.97x for Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.0.48x 10.90x -- -- XYIGYXinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.1.97x 9.18x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
