Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
29
CARCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$5.72
Seasonality move
:
-4.87%
Day range:
$5.72 - $5.72
52-week range:
$5.72 - $7.40
Dividend yield:
1.61%
P/E ratio:
41.45x
P/S ratio:
0.43x
P/B ratio:
0.21x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-5.45%
Market cap:
$1.3B
Revenue:
$3.2B
EPS (TTM):
$0.14
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CARCY
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HUABF
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LKSGF
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNFRF
Sinofert Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VSFFF
Green Economy Development Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XYIGY
Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CARCY
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.
|
$5.72 | -- | $1.3B | 41.45x | $0.05 | 1.61% | 0.43x |
|
HUABF
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.50 | -- | $1.6B | 54.29x | $0.01 | 0.31% | 3.42x |
|
LKSGF
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.
|
$0.10 | -- | $51.3M | 17.89x | $0.00 | 5.03% | 1.13x |
|
SNFRF
Sinofert Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.21 | -- | $1.5B | 10.90x | $0.00 | 3.46% | 0.48x |
|
VSFFF
Green Economy Development Ltd.
|
$0.07 | -- | $44.8M | 19.46x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.13x |
|
XYIGY
Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.
|
$26.24 | -- | $5.7B | 9.18x | $0.32 | 2.2% | 1.97x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CARCY
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.
|
26.44% | -0.031 | 126.41% | 0.45x |
|
HUABF
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
1.74% | 2.790 | -- | 7.34x |
|
LKSGF
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -12.462 | -- | 5.04x |
|
SNFRF
Sinofert Holdings Ltd.
|
14.85% | 1.768 | -- | 0.65x |
|
VSFFF
Green Economy Development Ltd.
|
59.7% | 0.000 | -- | 1.11x |
|
XYIGY
Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.
|
17.58% | 0.529 | -- | 0.74x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CARCY
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.
|
$92.6M | $7.9M | 0.02% | 0.03% | 1.16% | -- |
|
HUABF
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.74% | 0.76% | -- | -- |
|
LKSGF
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.82% | 0.82% | -- | -- |
|
SNFRF
Sinofert Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 8.76% | 10.26% | -- | -- |
|
VSFFF
Green Economy Development Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 10.34% | 31.1% | -- | -- |
|
XYIGY
Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 7.84% | 9.51% | -- | -- |
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CARCY or HUABF?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -0.17% compared to China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.03% beat Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.13.63% $0.01 $8.7B HUABFHuabao International Holdings Ltd.-- -- $2B -
What do Analysts Say About CARCY or HUABF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Huabao International Holdings Ltd., analysts believe China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Huabao International Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 HUABFHuabao International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CARCY or HUABF More Risky?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.010, which suggesting that the stock is 100.956% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.455, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.489%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CARCY or HUABF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Huabao International Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. pays 73.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Huabao International Holdings Ltd. pays out 54.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CARCY or HUABF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $679.6M, which are larger than Huabao International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$1.2M is higher than Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.45x while Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 54.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. is 0.43x versus 3.42x for Huabao International Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.0.43x 41.45x $679.6M -$1.2M HUABFHuabao International Holdings Ltd.3.42x 54.29x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CARCY or LKSGF?
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -0.17% compared to China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.03% beat Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.13.63% $0.01 $8.7B LKSGFLuks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.-- -- $295.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CARCY or LKSGF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 LKSGFLuks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CARCY or LKSGF More Risky?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.010, which suggesting that the stock is 100.956% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.614, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 161.434%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CARCY or LKSGF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. pays 73.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd. pays out 104.62% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CARCY or LKSGF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $679.6M, which are larger than Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$1.2M is higher than Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.45x while Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. is 0.43x versus 1.13x for Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.0.43x 41.45x $679.6M -$1.2M LKSGFLuks Group (Vietnam Holdings) Co., Ltd.1.13x 17.89x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CARCY or SNFRF?
Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -0.17% compared to China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.03% beat Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.13.63% $0.01 $8.7B SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.-- -- $1.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CARCY or SNFRF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sinofert Holdings Ltd., analysts believe China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Sinofert Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CARCY or SNFRF More Risky?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.010, which suggesting that the stock is 100.956% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinofert Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.070, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.971%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CARCY or SNFRF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Sinofert Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. pays 73.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinofert Holdings Ltd. pays out 34.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CARCY or SNFRF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $679.6M, which are larger than Sinofert Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$1.2M is higher than Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.45x while Sinofert Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. is 0.43x versus 0.48x for Sinofert Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.0.43x 41.45x $679.6M -$1.2M SNFRFSinofert Holdings Ltd.0.48x 10.90x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CARCY or VSFFF?
Green Economy Development Ltd. has a net margin of -0.17% compared to China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.03% beat Green Economy Development Ltd.'s return on equity of 31.1%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.13.63% $0.01 $8.7B VSFFFGreen Economy Development Ltd.-- -- $44.2M -
What do Analysts Say About CARCY or VSFFF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Green Economy Development Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Green Economy Development Ltd., analysts believe China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Green Economy Development Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 VSFFFGreen Economy Development Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CARCY or VSFFF More Risky?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.010, which suggesting that the stock is 100.956% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Economy Development Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CARCY or VSFFF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Green Economy Development Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. pays 73.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Economy Development Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CARCY or VSFFF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $679.6M, which are larger than Green Economy Development Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$1.2M is higher than Green Economy Development Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.45x while Green Economy Development Ltd.'s PE ratio is 19.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. is 0.43x versus 0.13x for Green Economy Development Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.0.43x 41.45x $679.6M -$1.2M VSFFFGreen Economy Development Ltd.0.13x 19.46x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CARCY or XYIGY?
Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -0.17% compared to China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.03% beat Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.13.63% $0.01 $8.7B XYIGYXinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.-- -- $5.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CARCY or XYIGY?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd., analysts believe China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 XYIGYXinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CARCY or XYIGY More Risky?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.010, which suggesting that the stock is 100.956% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.552, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.788%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CARCY or XYIGY?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. pays 73.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd. pays out 43.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CARCY or XYIGY?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $679.6M, which are larger than Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$1.2M is higher than Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.45x while Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd. is 0.43x versus 1.97x for Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings Ltd.0.43x 41.45x $679.6M -$1.2M XYIGYXinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.1.97x 9.18x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
