Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Sell
17
CARCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$5.85
Seasonality move
:
-2.14%
Day range:
$5.85 - $5.85
52-week range:
$3.86 - $8.81
Dividend yield:
1.71%
P/E ratio:
3.86x
P/S ratio:
0.33x
P/B ratio:
0.22x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
15
1-year change:
-10.23%
Market cap:
$1.4B
Revenue:
$3.6B
EPS (TTM):
$1.52
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CARCY
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHYI
Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRFX
Graphex Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LKSGF
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNFRF
Sinofert Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XYIGY
Xinyi Glass Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CARCY
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings
|
$5.85 | -- | $1.4B | 3.86x | $0.08 | 1.71% | 0.33x |
|
CHYI
Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings
|
$0.5500 | -- | $174.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GRFX
Graphex Group
|
$0.27 | -- | $13.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.39x |
|
LKSGF
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings)
|
$0.09 | -- | $42.7M | -- | $0.00 | 6.03% | 0.83x |
|
SNFRF
Sinofert Holdings
|
$0.14 | -- | $985.5M | 10.53x | $0.01 | 4.48% | 0.32x |
|
XYIGY
Xinyi Glass Holdings
|
$20.12 | -- | $4.3B | 5.55x | $0.80 | 8.67% | 1.27x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CARCY
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings
|
-- | -0.957 | -- | -- |
|
CHYI
Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings
|
-- | 50.311 | -- | -- |
|
GRFX
Graphex Group
|
39.73% | 1.808 | 156.58% | 0.69x |
|
LKSGF
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings)
|
-- | -0.705 | -- | 4.59x |
|
SNFRF
Sinofert Holdings
|
14.38% | 1.260 | 37.6% | 0.85x |
|
XYIGY
Xinyi Glass Holdings
|
16.57% | 0.248 | 19.87% | 0.72x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CARCY
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings
|
$119.1M | $39.8M | 5.43% | -- | 6.64% | -- |
|
CHYI
Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRFX
Graphex Group
|
-- | -- | -21.49% | -36.3% | -- | -- |
|
LKSGF
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings)
|
-- | -- | -3.85% | -3.89% | -- | -- |
|
SNFRF
Sinofert Holdings
|
-- | -- | 5.58% | 6.54% | -- | -- |
|
XYIGY
Xinyi Glass Holdings
|
-- | -- | 13.56% | 17.26% | -- | -- |
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CARCY or CHYI?
Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has a net margin of 2.61% compared to China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's net margin of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings15.61% $0.08 -- CHYIChykingyoung Investment Development Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CARCY or CHYI?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has higher upside potential than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, analysts believe China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings is more attractive than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings0 0 0 CHYIChykingyoung Investment Development Holdings0 0 0 -
Is CARCY or CHYI More Risky?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a beta of 0.069, which suggesting that the stock is 93.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has a beta of 4.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 317.491%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CARCY or CHYI?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings pays 49.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CARCY or CHYI?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings quarterly revenues are $763M, which are larger than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's net income of $19.9M is higher than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's net income of --. Notably, China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.86x while Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings is 0.33x versus -- for Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings0.33x 3.86x $763M $19.9M CHYIChykingyoung Investment Development Holdings-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CARCY or GRFX?
Graphex Group has a net margin of 2.61% compared to China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's net margin of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Graphex Group's return on equity of -36.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings15.61% $0.08 -- GRFXGraphex Group-- -- $70M -
What do Analysts Say About CARCY or GRFX?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Graphex Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.63%. Given that Graphex Group has higher upside potential than China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings, analysts believe Graphex Group is more attractive than China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings0 0 0 GRFXGraphex Group0 0 0 -
Is CARCY or GRFX More Risky?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a beta of 0.069, which suggesting that the stock is 93.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graphex Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CARCY or GRFX?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Graphex Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings pays 49.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Graphex Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CARCY or GRFX?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings quarterly revenues are $763M, which are larger than Graphex Group quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's net income of $19.9M is higher than Graphex Group's net income of --. Notably, China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.86x while Graphex Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings is 0.33x versus 0.39x for Graphex Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings0.33x 3.86x $763M $19.9M GRFXGraphex Group0.39x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CARCY or LKSGF?
Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) has a net margin of 2.61% compared to China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's net margin of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings)'s return on equity of -3.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings15.61% $0.08 -- LKSGFLuks Group (Vietnam Holdings)-- -- $298M -
What do Analysts Say About CARCY or LKSGF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has higher upside potential than Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings), analysts believe China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings is more attractive than Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings0 0 0 LKSGFLuks Group (Vietnam Holdings)0 0 0 -
Is CARCY or LKSGF More Risky?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a beta of 0.069, which suggesting that the stock is 93.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) has a beta of 0.295, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.533%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CARCY or LKSGF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) offers a yield of 6.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings pays 49.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) pays out -20.46% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CARCY or LKSGF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings quarterly revenues are $763M, which are larger than Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings) quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's net income of $19.9M is higher than Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings)'s net income of --. Notably, China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.86x while Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings is 0.33x versus 0.83x for Luks Group (Vietnam Holdings). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings0.33x 3.86x $763M $19.9M LKSGFLuks Group (Vietnam Holdings)0.83x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CARCY or SNFRF?
Sinofert Holdings has a net margin of 2.61% compared to China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's net margin of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Sinofert Holdings's return on equity of 6.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings15.61% $0.08 -- SNFRFSinofert Holdings-- -- $1.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CARCY or SNFRF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinofert Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has higher upside potential than Sinofert Holdings, analysts believe China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings is more attractive than Sinofert Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings0 0 0 SNFRFSinofert Holdings0 0 0 -
Is CARCY or SNFRF More Risky?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a beta of 0.069, which suggesting that the stock is 93.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinofert Holdings has a beta of 0.111, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.909%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CARCY or SNFRF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Sinofert Holdings offers a yield of 4.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings pays 49.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinofert Holdings pays out 65.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CARCY or SNFRF?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings quarterly revenues are $763M, which are larger than Sinofert Holdings quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's net income of $19.9M is higher than Sinofert Holdings's net income of --. Notably, China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.86x while Sinofert Holdings's PE ratio is 10.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings is 0.33x versus 0.32x for Sinofert Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings0.33x 3.86x $763M $19.9M SNFRFSinofert Holdings0.32x 10.53x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CARCY or XYIGY?
Xinyi Glass Holdings has a net margin of 2.61% compared to China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's net margin of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Xinyi Glass Holdings's return on equity of 17.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings15.61% $0.08 -- XYIGYXinyi Glass Holdings-- -- $5.5B -
What do Analysts Say About CARCY or XYIGY?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xinyi Glass Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has higher upside potential than Xinyi Glass Holdings, analysts believe China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings is more attractive than Xinyi Glass Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings0 0 0 XYIGYXinyi Glass Holdings0 0 0 -
Is CARCY or XYIGY More Risky?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a beta of 0.069, which suggesting that the stock is 93.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xinyi Glass Holdings has a beta of 0.529, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.062%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CARCY or XYIGY?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Xinyi Glass Holdings offers a yield of 8.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings pays 49.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Xinyi Glass Holdings pays out 17.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CARCY or XYIGY?
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings quarterly revenues are $763M, which are larger than Xinyi Glass Holdings quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's net income of $19.9M is higher than Xinyi Glass Holdings's net income of --. Notably, China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.86x while Xinyi Glass Holdings's PE ratio is 5.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings is 0.33x versus 1.27x for Xinyi Glass Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CARCYChina Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings0.33x 3.86x $763M $19.9M XYIGYXinyi Glass Holdings1.27x 5.55x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 25
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 25
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 25
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 15.37% over the past day.
