Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
12
INHD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.15
Seasonality move
:
-8.77%
Day range:
$0.14 - $0.18
52-week range:
$0.12 - $19.78
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.25x
P/B ratio:
0.14x
Volume:
137.9M
Avg. volume:
32.6M
1-year change:
-96.9%
Market cap:
$1.2M
Revenue:
$885.5K
EPS (TTM):
-$1.44
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
INHD
Inno Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
|
$629.9M | $0.84 | 2.89% | 185.88% | $35.00 |
|
KBSX
FST Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUD
Luda Technology Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
-- | -$0.02 | -- | -50% | $1.70 |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -64.16% | $1.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
INHD
Inno Holdings, Inc.
|
$0.15 | -- | $1.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.25x |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
|
$31.08 | $35.00 | $2.9B | 38.92x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.20x |
|
KBSX
FST Corp.
|
$1.56 | -- | $69.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.10x |
|
LUD
Luda Technology Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
$1.16 | $1.70 | $90.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
$0.64 | $1.50 | $58.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
INHD
Inno Holdings, Inc.
|
0.6% | -2.569 | 0.46% | 4.98x |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
|
45.47% | 1.899 | 22.94% | 0.71x |
|
KBSX
FST Corp.
|
54% | 0.000 | 54.07% | 0.44x |
|
LUD
Luda Technology Group
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
27.01% | 2.031 | 12.18% | 1.08x |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
0.07% | 0.780 | 0.03% | 17.12x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
INHD
Inno Holdings, Inc.
|
-$16K | -$1.6M | -94.91% | -97.17% | -143.68% | -$594.8K |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
|
$77.3M | $58.3M | 5.64% | 10.05% | 9.22% | -$18.1M |
|
KBSX
FST Corp.
|
$4.9M | -$946.7K | -11.67% | -14.21% | -7.54% | -- |
|
LUD
Luda Technology Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
-$95.7K | -$1.5M | -25.69% | -34.36% | -- | -$1.1M |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
-$18K | -$2M | -20.56% | -20.59% | -- | -$1.7M |
Inno Holdings, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns INHD or CENX?
Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of -142.36% compared to Inno Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.68%. Inno Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -97.17% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 10.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital INHDInno Holdings, Inc.-1.47% -$0.30 $8.3M CENXCentury Aluminum Co.12.23% $0.14 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About INHD or CENX?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.83%. Given that Century Aluminum Co. has higher upside potential than Inno Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Century Aluminum Co. is more attractive than Inno Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings INHDInno Holdings, Inc.0 0 0 CENXCentury Aluminum Co.3 0 0 -
Is INHD or CENX More Risky?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.528%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock INHD or CENX?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inno Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios INHD or CENX?
Inno Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $632.2M. Inno Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is lower than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, Inno Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 38.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inno Holdings, Inc. is 0.25x versus 1.20x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income INHDInno Holdings, Inc.0.25x -- $1.1M -$1.5M CENXCentury Aluminum Co.1.20x 38.92x $632.2M $10.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns INHD or KBSX?
FST Corp. has a net margin of -142.36% compared to Inno Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -5.7%. Inno Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -97.17% beat FST Corp.'s return on equity of -14.21%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital INHDInno Holdings, Inc.-1.47% -$0.30 $8.3M KBSXFST Corp.39.22% -$0.02 $65.3M -
What do Analysts Say About INHD or KBSX?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FST Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Inno Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than FST Corp., analysts believe Inno Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than FST Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings INHDInno Holdings, Inc.0 0 0 KBSXFST Corp.0 0 0 -
Is INHD or KBSX More Risky?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FST Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock INHD or KBSX?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FST Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inno Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FST Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios INHD or KBSX?
Inno Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than FST Corp. quarterly revenues of $12.6M. Inno Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is lower than FST Corp.'s net income of -$716K. Notably, Inno Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FST Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inno Holdings, Inc. is 0.25x versus 2.10x for FST Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income INHDInno Holdings, Inc.0.25x -- $1.1M -$1.5M KBSXFST Corp.2.10x -- $12.6M -$716K
-
Which has Higher Returns INHD or LUD?
Luda Technology Group has a net margin of -142.36% compared to Inno Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Inno Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -97.17% beat Luda Technology Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital INHDInno Holdings, Inc.-1.47% -$0.30 $8.3M LUDLuda Technology Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About INHD or LUD?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Luda Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Inno Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Luda Technology Group, analysts believe Inno Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Luda Technology Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings INHDInno Holdings, Inc.0 0 0 LUDLuda Technology Group0 0 0 -
Is INHD or LUD More Risky?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luda Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock INHD or LUD?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luda Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inno Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luda Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios INHD or LUD?
Inno Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are larger than Luda Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. Inno Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is higher than Luda Technology Group's net income of --. Notably, Inno Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luda Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inno Holdings, Inc. is 0.25x versus -- for Luda Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income INHDInno Holdings, Inc.0.25x -- $1.1M -$1.5M LUDLuda Technology Group-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns INHD or PZG?
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of -142.36% compared to Inno Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Inno Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -97.17% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital INHDInno Holdings, Inc.-1.47% -$0.30 $8.3M PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.-- -$0.06 $43.2M -
What do Analysts Say About INHD or PZG?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 46.55%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Inno Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Inno Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings INHDInno Holdings, Inc.0 0 0 PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.1 0 0 -
Is INHD or PZG More Risky?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock INHD or PZG?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inno Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios INHD or PZG?
Inno Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Inno Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Inno Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inno Holdings, Inc. is 0.25x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income INHDInno Holdings, Inc.0.25x -- $1.1M -$1.5M PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.-- -- -- -$4.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns INHD or XPL?
Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of -142.36% compared to Inno Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Inno Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -97.17% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital INHDInno Holdings, Inc.-1.47% -$0.30 $8.3M XPLSolitario Resources Corp.-- -$0.02 $24.8M -
What do Analysts Say About INHD or XPL?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 134.38%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Inno Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Inno Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings INHDInno Holdings, Inc.0 0 0 XPLSolitario Resources Corp.2 0 0 -
Is INHD or XPL More Risky?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.966%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock INHD or XPL?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inno Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios INHD or XPL?
Inno Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Inno Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Inno Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inno Holdings, Inc. is 0.25x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income INHDInno Holdings, Inc.0.25x -- $1.1M -$1.5M XPLSolitario Resources Corp.-- -- -- -$1.9M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
