CHCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadence Bank has a net margin of 34.43% compared to City Holding Co.'s net margin of 16.2%. City Holding Co.'s return on equity of 16.68% beat Cadence Bank's return on equity of 9.19%.

City Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $129.60, signalling upside risk potential of 5.13%. On the other hand Cadence Bank has an analysts' consensus of $43.11 which suggests that it could fall by -3.12%. Given that City Holding Co. has higher upside potential than Cadence Bank, analysts believe City Holding Co. is more attractive than Cadence Bank.

City Holding Co. has a beta of 0.519, which suggesting that the stock is 48.051% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Bank has a beta of 0.945, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.459%.

City Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Cadence Bank offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. City Holding Co. pays 38.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Bank pays out 36.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

City Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $101.3M, which are smaller than Cadence Bank quarterly revenues of $801.6M. City Holding Co.'s net income of $34.9M is lower than Cadence Bank's net income of $129.8M. Notably, City Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.18x while Cadence Bank's PE ratio is 16.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for City Holding Co. is 4.57x versus 2.81x for Cadence Bank. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. has a net margin of 34.43% compared to City Holding Co.'s net margin of 24.17%. City Holding Co.'s return on equity of 16.68% beat Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.6%.

City Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $129.60, signalling upside risk potential of 5.13%. On the other hand Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.72%. Given that Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than City Holding Co., analysts believe Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. is more attractive than City Holding Co..

City Holding Co. has a beta of 0.519, which suggesting that the stock is 48.051% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.731%.

City Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. City Holding Co. pays 38.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. pays out 58.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

City Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $101.3M, which are larger than Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $90.5M. City Holding Co.'s net income of $34.9M is higher than Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.'s net income of $21.9M. Notably, City Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.18x while Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for City Holding Co. is 4.57x versus 1.99x for Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida has a net margin of 34.43% compared to City Holding Co.'s net margin of 16.07%. City Holding Co.'s return on equity of 16.68% beat Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida's return on equity of 6.43%.

City Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $129.60, signalling upside risk potential of 5.13%. On the other hand Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida has an analysts' consensus of $34.08 which suggests that it could grow by 0.76%. Given that City Holding Co. has higher upside potential than Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida, analysts believe City Holding Co. is more attractive than Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida.

City Holding Co. has a beta of 0.519, which suggesting that the stock is 48.051% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida has a beta of 0.920, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.033%.

City Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. City Holding Co. pays 38.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

City Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $101.3M, which are smaller than Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida quarterly revenues of $226.9M. City Holding Co.'s net income of $34.9M is lower than Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida's net income of $36.5M. Notably, City Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.18x while Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida's PE ratio is 20.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for City Holding Co. is 4.57x versus 3.40x for Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Community Banks, Inc. has a net margin of 34.43% compared to City Holding Co.'s net margin of 22.2%. City Holding Co.'s return on equity of 16.68% beat United Community Banks, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.17%.

City Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $129.60, signalling upside risk potential of 5.13%. On the other hand United Community Banks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.17 which suggests that it could grow by 9.77%. Given that United Community Banks, Inc. has higher upside potential than City Holding Co., analysts believe United Community Banks, Inc. is more attractive than City Holding Co..

City Holding Co. has a beta of 0.519, which suggesting that the stock is 48.051% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Community Banks, Inc. has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.04%.

City Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. United Community Banks, Inc. offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. City Holding Co. pays 38.13% of its earnings as a dividend. United Community Banks, Inc. pays out 37.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

City Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $101.3M, which are smaller than United Community Banks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $386.8M. City Holding Co.'s net income of $34.9M is lower than United Community Banks, Inc.'s net income of $85.9M. Notably, City Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.18x while United Community Banks, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for City Holding Co. is 4.57x versus 2.67x for United Community Banks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.