Financhill
Buy
54

AUDC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$9.68
Seasonality move :
0.38%
Day range:
$9.51 - $9.70
52-week range:
$7.70 - $14.45
Dividend yield:
3.73%
P/E ratio:
24.10x
P/S ratio:
1.22x
P/B ratio:
1.49x
Volume:
117.8K
Avg. volume:
72K
1-year change:
-20.46%
Market cap:
$278.7M
Revenue:
$244.4M
EPS (TTM):
$0.40

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AUDC
AudioCodes
$61.5M $0.24 -3.22% 90% --
CLBT
Cellebrite DI
$102.1M $0.09 15.32% 195.1% $13.64
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
-- -- -- -- --
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
$137.3M $0.25 9.12% 43.82% --
SATX
SatixFy Communications
$5M -$0.12 463.99% -29.41% --
SYNX
Silynxcom
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AUDC
AudioCodes
$9.64 -- $278.7M 24.10x $0.18 3.73% 1.22x
CLBT
Cellebrite DI
$22.18 $13.64 $4.8B -- $0.00 0% 11.50x
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
$93.35 -- $1.4B 19.37x $0.63 1.33% 0.54x
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
$11.84 -- $581.3M 16.91x $0.24 3.72% 1.09x
SATX
SatixFy Communications
$1.22 -- $103.5M -- $0.00 0% 9.84x
SYNX
Silynxcom
$3.21 -- $16.3M -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AUDC
AudioCodes
-- 2.179 -- 1.58x
CLBT
Cellebrite DI
-- 1.184 -- 1.70x
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
43.74% 1.066 26.62% 1.29x
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
19.05% 0.351 10.86% 1.76x
SATX
SatixFy Communications
-305.75% 2.641 115.09% 0.28x
SYNX
Silynxcom
-- 0.000 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AUDC
AudioCodes
$39.3M $4.9M 6.58% 6.58% 8.09% $2.3M
CLBT
Cellebrite DI
$91.4M $19.4M -521.93% -521.93% 18.2% $39.8M
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
$172.9M $71M 4.12% 5.77% 10.15% --
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
$39.7M $15.1M 9.5% 11.96% 10.54% $6.6M
SATX
SatixFy Communications
$1.7M -$9.4M -- -- -382.33% --
SYNX
Silynxcom
-- -- -- -- -- --

AudioCodes vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AUDC or CLBT?

    Cellebrite DI has a net margin of 4.45% compared to AudioCodes's net margin of -193.8%. AudioCodes's return on equity of 6.58% beat Cellebrite DI's return on equity of -521.93%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    65.24% $0.09 $186.9M
    CLBT
    Cellebrite DI
    85.55% -$0.99 $298.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About AUDC or CLBT?

    AudioCodes has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.28%. On the other hand Cellebrite DI has an analysts' consensus of $13.64 which suggests that it could grow by 3.7%. Given that Cellebrite DI has higher upside potential than AudioCodes, analysts believe Cellebrite DI is more attractive than AudioCodes.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    0 0 0
    CLBT
    Cellebrite DI
    6 0 0
  • Is AUDC or CLBT More Risky?

    AudioCodes has a beta of 0.839, which suggesting that the stock is 16.06% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cellebrite DI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUDC or CLBT?

    AudioCodes has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. Cellebrite DI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioCodes pays 129.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Cellebrite DI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUDC or CLBT?

    AudioCodes quarterly revenues are $60.2M, which are smaller than Cellebrite DI quarterly revenues of $106.9M. AudioCodes's net income of $2.7M is higher than Cellebrite DI's net income of -$207.1M. Notably, AudioCodes's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.10x while Cellebrite DI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioCodes is 1.22x versus 11.50x for Cellebrite DI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    1.22x 24.10x $60.2M $2.7M
    CLBT
    Cellebrite DI
    11.50x -- $106.9M -$207.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns AUDC or FORTY?

    Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 4.45% compared to AudioCodes's net margin of 3.37%. AudioCodes's return on equity of 6.58% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity of 5.77%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    65.24% $0.09 $186.9M
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985)
    24.7% $1.51 $1.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About AUDC or FORTY?

    AudioCodes has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.28%. On the other hand Formula Systems (1985) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AudioCodes has higher upside potential than Formula Systems (1985), analysts believe AudioCodes is more attractive than Formula Systems (1985).

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    0 0 0
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985)
    0 0 0
  • Is AUDC or FORTY More Risky?

    AudioCodes has a beta of 0.839, which suggesting that the stock is 16.06% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.002%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUDC or FORTY?

    AudioCodes has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. Formula Systems (1985) offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. AudioCodes pays 129.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) pays out 15.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but AudioCodes's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUDC or FORTY?

    AudioCodes quarterly revenues are $60.2M, which are smaller than Formula Systems (1985) quarterly revenues of $699.9M. AudioCodes's net income of $2.7M is lower than Formula Systems (1985)'s net income of $23.6M. Notably, AudioCodes's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.10x while Formula Systems (1985)'s PE ratio is 19.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioCodes is 1.22x versus 0.54x for Formula Systems (1985). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    1.22x 24.10x $60.2M $2.7M
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985)
    0.54x 19.37x $699.9M $23.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns AUDC or MGIC?

    Magic Software Enterprises has a net margin of 4.45% compared to AudioCodes's net margin of 5.9%. AudioCodes's return on equity of 6.58% beat Magic Software Enterprises's return on equity of 11.96%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    65.24% $0.09 $186.9M
    MGIC
    Magic Software Enterprises
    27.76% $0.17 $370.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About AUDC or MGIC?

    AudioCodes has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.28%. On the other hand Magic Software Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26.69%. Given that Magic Software Enterprises has higher upside potential than AudioCodes, analysts believe Magic Software Enterprises is more attractive than AudioCodes.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    0 0 0
    MGIC
    Magic Software Enterprises
    0 0 0
  • Is AUDC or MGIC More Risky?

    AudioCodes has a beta of 0.839, which suggesting that the stock is 16.06% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Software Enterprises has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.312%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUDC or MGIC?

    AudioCodes has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. Magic Software Enterprises offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. AudioCodes pays 129.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises pays out 83.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but AudioCodes's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUDC or MGIC?

    AudioCodes quarterly revenues are $60.2M, which are smaller than Magic Software Enterprises quarterly revenues of $143M. AudioCodes's net income of $2.7M is lower than Magic Software Enterprises's net income of $8.4M. Notably, AudioCodes's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.10x while Magic Software Enterprises's PE ratio is 16.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioCodes is 1.22x versus 1.09x for Magic Software Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    1.22x 24.10x $60.2M $2.7M
    MGIC
    Magic Software Enterprises
    1.09x 16.91x $143M $8.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns AUDC or SATX?

    SatixFy Communications has a net margin of 4.45% compared to AudioCodes's net margin of -539.62%. AudioCodes's return on equity of 6.58% beat SatixFy Communications's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    65.24% $0.09 $186.9M
    SATX
    SatixFy Communications
    67.59% -$0.16 -$22.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About AUDC or SATX?

    AudioCodes has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.28%. On the other hand SatixFy Communications has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 84.43%. Given that SatixFy Communications has higher upside potential than AudioCodes, analysts believe SatixFy Communications is more attractive than AudioCodes.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    0 0 0
    SATX
    SatixFy Communications
    0 0 0
  • Is AUDC or SATX More Risky?

    AudioCodes has a beta of 0.839, which suggesting that the stock is 16.06% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SatixFy Communications has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUDC or SATX?

    AudioCodes has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. SatixFy Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioCodes pays 129.83% of its earnings as a dividend. SatixFy Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUDC or SATX?

    AudioCodes quarterly revenues are $60.2M, which are larger than SatixFy Communications quarterly revenues of $2.5M. AudioCodes's net income of $2.7M is higher than SatixFy Communications's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, AudioCodes's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.10x while SatixFy Communications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioCodes is 1.22x versus 9.84x for SatixFy Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    1.22x 24.10x $60.2M $2.7M
    SATX
    SatixFy Communications
    9.84x -- $2.5M -$13.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns AUDC or SYNX?

    Silynxcom has a net margin of 4.45% compared to AudioCodes's net margin of --. AudioCodes's return on equity of 6.58% beat Silynxcom's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    65.24% $0.09 $186.9M
    SYNX
    Silynxcom
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AUDC or SYNX?

    AudioCodes has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.28%. On the other hand Silynxcom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 149.22%. Given that Silynxcom has higher upside potential than AudioCodes, analysts believe Silynxcom is more attractive than AudioCodes.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    0 0 0
    SYNX
    Silynxcom
    0 0 0
  • Is AUDC or SYNX More Risky?

    AudioCodes has a beta of 0.839, which suggesting that the stock is 16.06% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silynxcom has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUDC or SYNX?

    AudioCodes has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. Silynxcom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioCodes pays 129.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Silynxcom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUDC or SYNX?

    AudioCodes quarterly revenues are $60.2M, which are larger than Silynxcom quarterly revenues of --. AudioCodes's net income of $2.7M is higher than Silynxcom's net income of --. Notably, AudioCodes's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.10x while Silynxcom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioCodes is 1.22x versus -- for Silynxcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    1.22x 24.10x $60.2M $2.7M
    SYNX
    Silynxcom
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…

Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?

Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…

NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?

If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x

Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Sell
40
MSTR alert for Dec 24

MicroStrategy [MSTR] is up 8.05% over the past day.

Sell
26
NUTX alert for Dec 24

Nutex Health [NUTX] is down 0.76% over the past day.

Sell
48
VRNA alert for Dec 24

Verona Pharma PLC [VRNA] is down 0.4% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock