Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
55
NICE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$117.75
Seasonality move
:
5.34%
Day range:
$113.03 - $117.87
52-week range:
$94.65 - $180.61
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
12.06x
P/S ratio:
2.51x
P/B ratio:
1.88x
Volume:
1M
Avg. volume:
1M
1-year change:
-23.37%
Market cap:
$7.3B
Revenue:
$3B
EPS (TTM):
$9.76
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
|
$779.9M | $3.21 | 9.22% | 26.01% | $156.33 |
|
ESYL
Easylink Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$156.8M | $0.27 | 9.97% | 23.44% | $18.00 |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
|
$117.69 | $156.33 | $7.3B | 12.06x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.51x |
|
ESYL
Easylink Solutions Corp.
|
$0.0060 | -- | $33.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
$120.70 | -- | $1.9B | 26.42x | $0.52 | 2.03% | 0.65x |
|
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
|
$80.65 | -- | $1.9B | 25.62x | $0.31 | 1.79% | 2.49x |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$19.40 | $18.00 | $952.5M | 23.89x | $0.15 | 3.99% | 1.58x |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
$1.19 | -- | $24.2M | 8.51x | $0.22 | 18.49% | 1.25x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
|
2.24% | 0.051 | 1.27% | 1.30x |
|
ESYL
Easylink Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -5.892 | -- | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
45.09% | 1.956 | 21.91% | 0.94x |
|
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
|
18.1% | 0.385 | 4.16% | 1.00x |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
25.78% | 0.766 | 10.75% | 1.37x |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
4.15% | -0.778 | 4.29% | 3.35x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
|
$517.1M | $177.3M | 15.13% | 16.61% | 22.41% | $157.6M |
|
ESYL
Easylink Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
$136.3M | $54.8M | 8.65% | 12.6% | 7.83% | -- |
|
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
|
$47.7M | $23.2M | 17.7% | 22.26% | 10.89% | $34.4M |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$44.2M | $17.3M | 12.1% | 15.76% | 10.7% | $19.9M |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
$2.6M | $644K | 12.49% | 12.95% | 13.35% | $1.3M |
NICE Ltd. (Israel) vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NICE or ESYL?
Easylink Solutions Corp. has a net margin of 19.14% compared to NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s net margin of --. NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s return on equity of 16.61% beat Easylink Solutions Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)65.34% $2.43 $4B ESYLEasylink Solutions Corp.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NICE or ESYL?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a consensus price target of $156.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.84%. On the other hand Easylink Solutions Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NICE Ltd. (Israel) has higher upside potential than Easylink Solutions Corp., analysts believe NICE Ltd. (Israel) is more attractive than Easylink Solutions Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)7 6 0 ESYLEasylink Solutions Corp.0 0 0 -
Is NICE or ESYL More Risky?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Easylink Solutions Corp. has a beta of 1.143, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.311%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NICE or ESYL?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Easylink Solutions Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NICE Ltd. (Israel) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Easylink Solutions Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NICE or ESYL?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) quarterly revenues are $791.4M, which are larger than Easylink Solutions Corp. quarterly revenues of --. NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s net income of $151.5M is higher than Easylink Solutions Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.06x while Easylink Solutions Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NICE Ltd. (Israel) is 2.51x versus -- for Easylink Solutions Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)2.51x 12.06x $791.4M $151.5M ESYLEasylink Solutions Corp.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NICE or FORTY?
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a net margin of 19.14% compared to NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s net margin of 4.98%. NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s return on equity of 16.61% beat Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.6%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)65.34% $2.43 $4B FORTYFormula Systems (1985) Ltd.19.48% $1.09 $2.2B -
What do Analysts Say About NICE or FORTY?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a consensus price target of $156.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.84%. On the other hand Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NICE Ltd. (Israel) has higher upside potential than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd., analysts believe NICE Ltd. (Israel) is more attractive than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)7 6 0 FORTYFormula Systems (1985) Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NICE or FORTY More Risky?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.735%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NICE or FORTY?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. NICE Ltd. (Israel) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. pays out 22.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NICE or FORTY?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) quarterly revenues are $791.4M, which are larger than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. quarterly revenues of $699.9M. NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s net income of $151.5M is higher than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net income of $34.9M. Notably, NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.06x while Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s PE ratio is 26.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NICE Ltd. (Israel) is 2.51x versus 0.65x for Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)2.51x 12.06x $791.4M $151.5M FORTYFormula Systems (1985) Ltd.0.65x 26.42x $699.9M $34.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns NICE or HLTEF?
Hilan Ltd. has a net margin of 19.14% compared to NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s net margin of 7.82%. NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s return on equity of 16.61% beat Hilan Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)65.34% $2.43 $4B HLTEFHilan Ltd.22.38% $0.71 $453.7M -
What do Analysts Say About NICE or HLTEF?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a consensus price target of $156.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.84%. On the other hand Hilan Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NICE Ltd. (Israel) has higher upside potential than Hilan Ltd., analysts believe NICE Ltd. (Israel) is more attractive than Hilan Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)7 6 0 HLTEFHilan Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NICE or HLTEF More Risky?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hilan Ltd. has a beta of -0.011, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.074%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NICE or HLTEF?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hilan Ltd. offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. NICE Ltd. (Israel) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hilan Ltd. pays out 27.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Hilan Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NICE or HLTEF?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) quarterly revenues are $791.4M, which are larger than Hilan Ltd. quarterly revenues of $213.1M. NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s net income of $151.5M is higher than Hilan Ltd.'s net income of $16.7M. Notably, NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.06x while Hilan Ltd.'s PE ratio is 25.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NICE Ltd. (Israel) is 2.51x versus 2.49x for Hilan Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)2.51x 12.06x $791.4M $151.5M HLTEFHilan Ltd.2.49x 25.62x $213.1M $16.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns NICE or MGIC?
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has a net margin of 19.14% compared to NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s net margin of 7.39%. NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s return on equity of 16.61% beat Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)65.34% $2.43 $4B MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.27.35% $0.20 $396.7M -
What do Analysts Say About NICE or MGIC?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a consensus price target of $156.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.84%. On the other hand Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could fall by -7.22%. Given that NICE Ltd. (Israel) has higher upside potential than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd., analysts believe NICE Ltd. (Israel) is more attractive than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)7 6 0 MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.0 1 0 -
Is NICE or MGIC More Risky?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.526%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NICE or MGIC?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. offers a yield of 3.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. NICE Ltd. (Israel) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. pays out 58.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NICE or MGIC?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) quarterly revenues are $791.4M, which are larger than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. quarterly revenues of $161.7M. NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s net income of $151.5M is higher than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s net income of $12M. Notably, NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.06x while Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s PE ratio is 23.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NICE Ltd. (Israel) is 2.51x versus 1.58x for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)2.51x 12.06x $791.4M $151.5M MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.1.58x 23.89x $161.7M $12M
-
Which has Higher Returns NICE or MNDO?
MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has a net margin of 19.14% compared to NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s net margin of 14.12%. NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s return on equity of 16.61% beat MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)65.34% $2.43 $4B MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd.52.93% $0.03 $23.1M -
What do Analysts Say About NICE or MNDO?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a consensus price target of $156.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.84%. On the other hand MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NICE Ltd. (Israel) has higher upside potential than MIND C.T.I. Ltd., analysts believe NICE Ltd. (Israel) is more attractive than MIND C.T.I. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)7 6 0 MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NICE or MNDO More Risky?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has a beta of 0.585, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.497%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NICE or MNDO?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MIND C.T.I. Ltd. offers a yield of 18.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. NICE Ltd. (Israel) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MIND C.T.I. Ltd. pays out 106.67% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NICE or MNDO?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) quarterly revenues are $791.4M, which are larger than MIND C.T.I. Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s net income of $151.5M is higher than MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s net income of $681K. Notably, NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.06x while MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NICE Ltd. (Israel) is 2.51x versus 1.25x for MIND C.T.I. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)2.51x 12.06x $791.4M $151.5M MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd.1.25x 8.51x $4.8M $681K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
73
HYMC alert for Feb 21
Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. [HYMC] is down 2.47% over the past day.
Buy
66
OMC alert for Feb 21
Omnicom Group, Inc. [OMC] is up 2.87% over the past day.
