Financhill
Sell
30

FORTY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$121.70
Seasonality move :
8.08%
Day range:
$133.50 - $133.50
52-week range:
$82.52 - $190.56
Dividend yield:
1.83%
P/E ratio:
29.22x
P/S ratio:
0.72x
P/B ratio:
2.63x
Volume:
245
Avg. volume:
310
1-year change:
37.13%
Market cap:
$2B
Revenue:
$2.8B
EPS (TTM):
$4.56

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
APYP
AppYea, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
$156.8M $0.27 9.97% 23.44% $18.00
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
$779.9M $3.21 9.18% 30.54% $159.33
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
$133.50 -- $2B 29.22x $0.52 1.83% 0.72x
APYP
AppYea, Inc.
$0.0201 -- $12M -- $0.00 0% 568.16x
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
$80.65 -- $1.9B 25.62x $0.31 1.78% 2.49x
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
$20.14 $18.00 $988.9M 24.80x $0.15 3.84% 1.64x
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
$1.13 -- $23M 8.08x $0.22 19.47% 1.18x
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
$110.97 $159.33 $6.9B 12.50x $0.00 0% 2.44x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
45.09% 1.956 21.91% 0.94x
APYP
AppYea, Inc.
4354.95% 2.235 52.49% 0.06x
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
18.1% 0.385 4.16% 1.00x
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
25.78% 0.766 10.75% 1.37x
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
4.15% -0.778 4.29% 3.35x
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
2.2% 0.051 0.97% 1.19x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
$136.3M $54.8M 8.65% 12.6% 7.83% --
APYP
AppYea, Inc.
-$5K -$237K -32620.54% -- -11850% -$137K
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
$47.7M $23.2M 17.7% 22.26% 10.89% $34.4M
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
$44.2M $17.3M 12.1% 15.76% 10.7% $19.9M
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
$2.6M $644K 12.49% 12.95% 13.35% $1.3M
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
$491.4M $170.2M 13.75% 15.48% 23.15% $164.5M

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns FORTY or APYP?

    AppYea, Inc. has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net margin of -233900%. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.6% beat AppYea, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    19.48% $1.09 $2.2B
    APYP
    AppYea, Inc.
    -250% -$0.01 $168K
  • What do Analysts Say About FORTY or APYP?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AppYea, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has higher upside potential than AppYea, Inc., analysts believe Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is more attractive than AppYea, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    0 0 0
    APYP
    AppYea, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is FORTY or APYP More Risky?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.735% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AppYea, Inc. has a beta of 0.567, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.328%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FORTY or APYP?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. AppYea, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. pays 22.24% of its earnings as a dividend. AppYea, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FORTY or APYP?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. quarterly revenues are $699.9M, which are larger than AppYea, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2K. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net income of $34.9M is higher than AppYea, Inc.'s net income of -$4.7M. Notably, Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.22x while AppYea, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is 0.72x versus 568.16x for AppYea, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    0.72x 29.22x $699.9M $34.9M
    APYP
    AppYea, Inc.
    568.16x -- $2K -$4.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns FORTY or HLTEF?

    Hilan Ltd. has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net margin of 7.82%. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.6% beat Hilan Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.26%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    19.48% $1.09 $2.2B
    HLTEF
    Hilan Ltd.
    22.38% $0.71 $453.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About FORTY or HLTEF?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hilan Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has higher upside potential than Hilan Ltd., analysts believe Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is more attractive than Hilan Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    0 0 0
    HLTEF
    Hilan Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is FORTY or HLTEF More Risky?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.735% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hilan Ltd. has a beta of -0.011, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.075%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FORTY or HLTEF?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. Hilan Ltd. offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. pays 22.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Hilan Ltd. pays out 27.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FORTY or HLTEF?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. quarterly revenues are $699.9M, which are larger than Hilan Ltd. quarterly revenues of $213.1M. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net income of $34.9M is higher than Hilan Ltd.'s net income of $16.7M. Notably, Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.22x while Hilan Ltd.'s PE ratio is 25.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is 0.72x versus 2.49x for Hilan Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    0.72x 29.22x $699.9M $34.9M
    HLTEF
    Hilan Ltd.
    2.49x 25.62x $213.1M $16.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns FORTY or MGIC?

    Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net margin of 7.39%. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.6% beat Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.76%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    19.48% $1.09 $2.2B
    MGIC
    Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
    27.35% $0.20 $396.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About FORTY or MGIC?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could fall by -10.63%. Given that Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has higher upside potential than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd., analysts believe Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. is more attractive than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    0 0 0
    MGIC
    Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
    0 1 0
  • Is FORTY or MGIC More Risky?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.735% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.526%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FORTY or MGIC?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. pays 22.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. pays out 58.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FORTY or MGIC?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. quarterly revenues are $699.9M, which are larger than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. quarterly revenues of $161.7M. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net income of $34.9M is higher than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s net income of $12M. Notably, Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.22x while Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is 0.72x versus 1.64x for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    0.72x 29.22x $699.9M $34.9M
    MGIC
    Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
    1.64x 24.80x $161.7M $12M
  • Which has Higher Returns FORTY or MNDO?

    MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net margin of 14.12%. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.6% beat MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.95%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    19.48% $1.09 $2.2B
    MNDO
    MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
    52.93% $0.03 $23.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About FORTY or MNDO?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has higher upside potential than MIND C.T.I. Ltd., analysts believe Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is more attractive than MIND C.T.I. Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    0 0 0
    MNDO
    MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is FORTY or MNDO More Risky?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.735% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has a beta of 0.585, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.497%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FORTY or MNDO?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. MIND C.T.I. Ltd. offers a yield of 19.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. pays 22.24% of its earnings as a dividend. MIND C.T.I. Ltd. pays out 106.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FORTY or MNDO?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. quarterly revenues are $699.9M, which are larger than MIND C.T.I. Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net income of $34.9M is higher than MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s net income of $681K. Notably, Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.22x while MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is 0.72x versus 1.18x for MIND C.T.I. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    0.72x 29.22x $699.9M $34.9M
    MNDO
    MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
    1.18x 8.08x $4.8M $681K
  • Which has Higher Returns FORTY or NICE?

    NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net margin of 19.79%. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.6% beat NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s return on equity of 15.48%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    19.48% $1.09 $2.2B
    NICE
    NICE Ltd. (Israel)
    66.81% $2.30 $3.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About FORTY or NICE?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NICE Ltd. (Israel) has an analysts' consensus of $159.33 which suggests that it could grow by 43.58%. Given that NICE Ltd. (Israel) has higher upside potential than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd., analysts believe NICE Ltd. (Israel) is more attractive than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    0 0 0
    NICE
    NICE Ltd. (Israel)
    7 6 0
  • Is FORTY or NICE More Risky?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.735% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.175%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FORTY or NICE?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. NICE Ltd. (Israel) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. pays 22.24% of its earnings as a dividend. NICE Ltd. (Israel) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FORTY or NICE?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. quarterly revenues are $699.9M, which are smaller than NICE Ltd. (Israel) quarterly revenues of $735.4M. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net income of $34.9M is lower than NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s net income of $145.5M. Notably, Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.22x while NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s PE ratio is 12.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is 0.72x versus 2.44x for NICE Ltd. (Israel). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    0.72x 29.22x $699.9M $34.9M
    NICE
    NICE Ltd. (Israel)
    2.44x 12.50x $735.4M $145.5M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?

Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…

Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?

Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…

Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…

Stock Ideas

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x

Alerts

Buy
91
TDC alert for Feb 12

Teradata Corp. [TDC] is down 11.64% over the past day.

Buy
67
DIOD alert for Feb 12

Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is down 7.63% over the past day.

Buy
77
VRT alert for Feb 12

Vertiv Holdings Co. [VRT] is down 4.79% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock