Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $8.00 |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$156.8M | $0.27 | 9.97% | 23.44% | $18.00 |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MYSZ
My Size, Inc.
|
$3.5M | -$0.32 | 140.55% | -8.7% | $3.00 |
|
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
|
$779.9M | $3.21 | 7.23% | 107.66% | $160.67 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
$1.28 | $8.00 | $6.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.20x |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
$167.02 | -- | $2.6B | 36.59x | $0.50 | 1.46% | 0.91x |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$27.20 | $18.00 | $1.3B | 33.49x | $0.15 | 2.85% | 2.21x |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
$1.18 | -- | $24M | 8.44x | $0.22 | 18.64% | 1.23x |
|
MYSZ
My Size, Inc.
|
$0.78 | $3.00 | $3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.28x |
|
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
|
$115.72 | $160.67 | $7.1B | 13.03x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.55x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
-- | 1.606 | -- | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
45.09% | 1.883 | 21.91% | 0.94x |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
25.78% | 0.738 | 10.75% | 1.37x |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
4.15% | -0.653 | 4.29% | 3.35x |
|
MYSZ
My Size, Inc.
|
11.48% | 0.503 | 20.65% | 1.50x |
|
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
|
2.2% | 0.062 | 0.97% | 1.19x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
$136.3M | $54.8M | 8.65% | 12.6% | 7.83% | -- |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$44.2M | $17.3M | 12.1% | 15.76% | 10.7% | $19.9M |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
$2.6M | $644K | 12.49% | 12.95% | 13.35% | $1.3M |
|
MYSZ
My Size, Inc.
|
$1M | -$1.4M | -52.24% | -55.44% | -52.72% | -$617.7K |
|
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
|
$491.4M | $170.2M | 13.75% | 15.48% | 23.15% | $164.5M |
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Silynxcom Ltd.'s net margin of 4.98%. Silynxcom Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.6%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
19.48% | $1.09 | $2.2B |
Silynxcom Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 525%. On the other hand Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Silynxcom Ltd. has higher upside potential than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd., analysts believe Silynxcom Ltd. is more attractive than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
1 | 0 | 0 |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Silynxcom Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a beta of 1.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.425%.
Silynxcom Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Silynxcom Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. pays out 22.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Silynxcom Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. quarterly revenues of $699.9M. Silynxcom Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net income of $34.9M. Notably, Silynxcom Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s PE ratio is 36.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silynxcom Ltd. is 1.20x versus 0.91x for Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
1.20x | -- | -- | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
0.91x | 36.59x | $699.9M | $34.9M |
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Silynxcom Ltd.'s net margin of 7.39%. Silynxcom Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.76%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
27.35% | $0.20 | $396.7M |
Silynxcom Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 525%. On the other hand Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could fall by -33.82%. Given that Silynxcom Ltd. has higher upside potential than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd., analysts believe Silynxcom Ltd. is more attractive than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
1 | 0 | 0 |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
0 | 1 | 0 |
Silynxcom Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.202%.
Silynxcom Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. offers a yield of 2.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Silynxcom Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. pays out 58.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Silynxcom Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. quarterly revenues of $161.7M. Silynxcom Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s net income of $12M. Notably, Silynxcom Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s PE ratio is 33.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silynxcom Ltd. is 1.20x versus 2.21x for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
1.20x | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
2.21x | 33.49x | $161.7M | $12M |
MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Silynxcom Ltd.'s net margin of 14.12%. Silynxcom Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.95%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
52.93% | $0.03 | $23.1M |
Silynxcom Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 525%. On the other hand MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Silynxcom Ltd. has higher upside potential than MIND C.T.I. Ltd., analysts believe Silynxcom Ltd. is more attractive than MIND C.T.I. Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
1 | 0 | 0 |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Silynxcom Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has a beta of 0.593, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.734%.
Silynxcom Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MIND C.T.I. Ltd. offers a yield of 18.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Silynxcom Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MIND C.T.I. Ltd. pays out 106.67% of its earnings as a dividend.
Silynxcom Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MIND C.T.I. Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Silynxcom Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s net income of $681K. Notably, Silynxcom Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silynxcom Ltd. is 1.20x versus 1.23x for MIND C.T.I. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
1.20x | -- | -- | -- |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
1.23x | 8.44x | $4.8M | $681K |
My Size, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Silynxcom Ltd.'s net margin of -51.91%. Silynxcom Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat My Size, Inc.'s return on equity of -55.44%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- |
|
MYSZ
My Size, Inc.
|
39.23% | -$0.40 | $8.2M |
Silynxcom Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 525%. On the other hand My Size, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 282.41%. Given that Silynxcom Ltd. has higher upside potential than My Size, Inc., analysts believe Silynxcom Ltd. is more attractive than My Size, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
1 | 0 | 0 |
|
MYSZ
My Size, Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Silynxcom Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison My Size, Inc. has a beta of -0.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.852%.
Silynxcom Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. My Size, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Silynxcom Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. My Size, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Silynxcom Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than My Size, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.6M. Silynxcom Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than My Size, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Silynxcom Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while My Size, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silynxcom Ltd. is 1.20x versus 0.28x for My Size, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
1.20x | -- | -- | -- |
|
MYSZ
My Size, Inc.
|
0.28x | -- | $2.6M | -$1.3M |
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a net margin of -- compared to Silynxcom Ltd.'s net margin of 19.79%. Silynxcom Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s return on equity of 15.48%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- |
|
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
|
66.81% | $2.30 | $3.9B |
Silynxcom Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 525%. On the other hand NICE Ltd. (Israel) has an analysts' consensus of $160.67 which suggests that it could grow by 38.84%. Given that Silynxcom Ltd. has higher upside potential than NICE Ltd. (Israel), analysts believe Silynxcom Ltd. is more attractive than NICE Ltd. (Israel).
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
1 | 0 | 0 |
|
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
|
7 | 6 | 0 |
Silynxcom Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.16%.
Silynxcom Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NICE Ltd. (Israel) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Silynxcom Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NICE Ltd. (Israel) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Silynxcom Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NICE Ltd. (Israel) quarterly revenues of $735.4M. Silynxcom Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s net income of $145.5M. Notably, Silynxcom Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s PE ratio is 13.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silynxcom Ltd. is 1.20x versus 2.55x for NICE Ltd. (Israel). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
1.20x | -- | -- | -- |
|
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
|
2.55x | 13.03x | $735.4M | $145.5M |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 22.74% over the past day.
Innodata, Inc. [INOD] is up 4.84% over the past day.
AeroVironment, Inc. [AVAV] is up 6.62% over the past day.