SYNX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Magic Software Enterprises has a net margin of -- compared to Silynxcom's net margin of 7.45%. Silynxcom's return on equity of -- beat Magic Software Enterprises's return on equity of 12.43%.

Silynxcom has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 346.93%. On the other hand Magic Software Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.62%. Given that Silynxcom has higher upside potential than Magic Software Enterprises, analysts believe Silynxcom is more attractive than Magic Software Enterprises.

Silynxcom has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Software Enterprises has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.05%.

Silynxcom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Software Enterprises offers a yield of 5.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Silynxcom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises pays out 27.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Silynxcom quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Software Enterprises quarterly revenues of $142.6M. Silynxcom's net income of -- is lower than Magic Software Enterprises's net income of $10.6M. Notably, Silynxcom's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magic Software Enterprises's PE ratio is 18.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silynxcom is -- versus 1.22x for Magic Software Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MIND C.T.I. has a net margin of -- compared to Silynxcom's net margin of 23.81%. Silynxcom's return on equity of -- beat MIND C.T.I.'s return on equity of 20.12%.

Silynxcom has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 346.93%. On the other hand MIND C.T.I. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Silynxcom has higher upside potential than MIND C.T.I., analysts believe Silynxcom is more attractive than MIND C.T.I..

Silynxcom has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MIND C.T.I. has a beta of 0.704, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.627%.

Silynxcom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MIND C.T.I. offers a yield of 13.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Silynxcom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MIND C.T.I. pays out 105.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Silynxcom quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MIND C.T.I. quarterly revenues of $5.2M. Silynxcom's net income of -- is lower than MIND C.T.I.'s net income of $1.2M. Notably, Silynxcom's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MIND C.T.I.'s PE ratio is 7.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silynxcom is -- versus 1.62x for MIND C.T.I.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NICE has a net margin of -- compared to Silynxcom's net margin of 13.79%. Silynxcom's return on equity of -- beat NICE's return on equity of 12.67%.

Silynxcom has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 346.93%. On the other hand NICE has an analysts' consensus of $211.19 which suggests that it could grow by 39.49%. Given that Silynxcom has higher upside potential than NICE, analysts believe Silynxcom is more attractive than NICE.

Silynxcom has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NICE has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.175%.

Silynxcom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NICE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Silynxcom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NICE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Silynxcom quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NICE quarterly revenues of $721.6M. Silynxcom's net income of -- is lower than NICE's net income of $99.5M. Notably, Silynxcom's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NICE's PE ratio is 22.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silynxcom is -- versus 3.63x for NICE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SatixFy Communications has a net margin of -- compared to Silynxcom's net margin of -539.62%. Silynxcom's return on equity of -- beat SatixFy Communications's return on equity of --.

Silynxcom has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 346.93%. On the other hand SatixFy Communications has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could grow by 26.26%. Given that Silynxcom has higher upside potential than SatixFy Communications, analysts believe Silynxcom is more attractive than SatixFy Communications.

Silynxcom has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SatixFy Communications has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Silynxcom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SatixFy Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Silynxcom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SatixFy Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Silynxcom quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SatixFy Communications quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Silynxcom's net income of -- is lower than SatixFy Communications's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Silynxcom's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SatixFy Communications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silynxcom is -- versus 8.03x for SatixFy Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.