PEP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. has a net margin of 10.94% compared to PepsiCo, Inc.'s net margin of 15.37%. PepsiCo, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.53% beat Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.38%.

PepsiCo, Inc. has a consensus price target of $155.91, signalling upside risk potential of 5.23%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $34.13 which suggests that it could grow by 22.39%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, Inc., analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. is more attractive than PepsiCo, Inc..

PepsiCo, Inc. has a beta of 0.420, which suggesting that the stock is 58.023% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. has a beta of 0.352, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.831%.

PepsiCo, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. PepsiCo, Inc. pays 76.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. pays out 84.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.9B, which are larger than Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. PepsiCo, Inc.'s net income of $2.6B is higher than Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.'s net income of $662M. Notably, PepsiCo, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.19x while Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo, Inc. is 2.20x versus 2.35x for Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Coca-Cola Co. has a net margin of 10.94% compared to PepsiCo, Inc.'s net margin of 29.32%. PepsiCo, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.53% beat The Coca-Cola Co.'s return on equity of 44.72%.

PepsiCo, Inc. has a consensus price target of $155.91, signalling upside risk potential of 5.23%. On the other hand The Coca-Cola Co. has an analysts' consensus of $79.61 which suggests that it could grow by 13.63%. Given that The Coca-Cola Co. has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, Inc., analysts believe The Coca-Cola Co. is more attractive than PepsiCo, Inc..

PepsiCo, Inc. has a beta of 0.420, which suggesting that the stock is 58.023% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Coca-Cola Co. has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.534%.

PepsiCo, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. The Coca-Cola Co. offers a yield of 2.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. PepsiCo, Inc. pays 76.68% of its earnings as a dividend. The Coca-Cola Co. pays out 78.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.9B, which are larger than The Coca-Cola Co. quarterly revenues of $12.6B. PepsiCo, Inc.'s net income of $2.6B is lower than The Coca-Cola Co.'s net income of $3.7B. Notably, PepsiCo, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.19x while The Coca-Cola Co.'s PE ratio is 23.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo, Inc. is 2.20x versus 6.33x for The Coca-Cola Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mondelez International, Inc. has a net margin of 10.94% compared to PepsiCo, Inc.'s net margin of 7.66%. PepsiCo, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.53% beat Mondelez International, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.31%.

PepsiCo, Inc. has a consensus price target of $155.91, signalling upside risk potential of 5.23%. On the other hand Mondelez International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $68.41 which suggests that it could grow by 25.61%. Given that Mondelez International, Inc. has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, Inc., analysts believe Mondelez International, Inc. is more attractive than PepsiCo, Inc..

PepsiCo, Inc. has a beta of 0.420, which suggesting that the stock is 58.023% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International, Inc. has a beta of 0.388, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.206%.

PepsiCo, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. Mondelez International, Inc. offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. PepsiCo, Inc. pays 76.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International, Inc. pays out 52.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.9B, which are larger than Mondelez International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.7B. PepsiCo, Inc.'s net income of $2.6B is higher than Mondelez International, Inc.'s net income of $746M. Notably, PepsiCo, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.19x while Mondelez International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo, Inc. is 2.20x versus 1.90x for Mondelez International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage Corp. has a net margin of 10.94% compared to PepsiCo, Inc.'s net margin of 23.87%. PepsiCo, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.53% beat Monster Beverage Corp.'s return on equity of 26.01%.

PepsiCo, Inc. has a consensus price target of $155.91, signalling upside risk potential of 5.23%. On the other hand Monster Beverage Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $75.7727 which suggests that it could fall by -0.64%. Given that PepsiCo, Inc. has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage Corp., analysts believe PepsiCo, Inc. is more attractive than Monster Beverage Corp..

PepsiCo, Inc. has a beta of 0.420, which suggesting that the stock is 58.023% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage Corp. has a beta of 0.479, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.117%.

PepsiCo, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. Monster Beverage Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PepsiCo, Inc. pays 76.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.9B, which are larger than Monster Beverage Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.2B. PepsiCo, Inc.'s net income of $2.6B is higher than Monster Beverage Corp.'s net income of $524.5M. Notably, PepsiCo, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.19x while Monster Beverage Corp.'s PE ratio is 43.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo, Inc. is 2.20x versus 9.40x for Monster Beverage Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.