CELH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. has a net margin of -8.42% compared to Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 15.37%. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.66% beat Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.38%.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $66.00, signalling upside risk potential of 53.63%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $34.73 which suggests that it could grow by 22.6%. Given that Celsius Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc., analysts believe Celsius Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc..

Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. has a beta of 0.352, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.831%.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. offers a yield of 3.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Celsius Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. pays out 84.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $725.1M, which are smaller than Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$61M is lower than Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.'s net income of $662M. Notably, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 462.05x while Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings, Inc. is 4.89x versus 2.38x for Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Coca-Cola Co. has a net margin of -8.42% compared to Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 29.32%. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.66% beat The Coca-Cola Co.'s return on equity of 44.72%.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $66.00, signalling upside risk potential of 53.63%. On the other hand The Coca-Cola Co. has an analysts' consensus of $79.13 which suggests that it could grow by 11.75%. Given that Celsius Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Coca-Cola Co., analysts believe Celsius Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than The Coca-Cola Co..

Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Coca-Cola Co. has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.534%.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Coca-Cola Co. offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Celsius Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Coca-Cola Co. pays out 78.83% of its earnings as a dividend. The Coca-Cola Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $725.1M, which are smaller than The Coca-Cola Co. quarterly revenues of $12.6B. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$61M is lower than The Coca-Cola Co.'s net income of $3.7B. Notably, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 462.05x while The Coca-Cola Co.'s PE ratio is 23.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings, Inc. is 4.89x versus 6.40x for The Coca-Cola Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage Corp. has a net margin of -8.42% compared to Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 23.87%. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.66% beat Monster Beverage Corp.'s return on equity of 26.01%.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $66.00, signalling upside risk potential of 53.63%. On the other hand Monster Beverage Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $74.6818 which suggests that it could grow by 0.7%. Given that Celsius Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage Corp., analysts believe Celsius Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Monster Beverage Corp..

Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage Corp. has a beta of 0.479, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.117%.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monster Beverage Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celsius Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $725.1M, which are smaller than Monster Beverage Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$61M is lower than Monster Beverage Corp.'s net income of $524.5M. Notably, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 462.05x while Monster Beverage Corp.'s PE ratio is 42.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings, Inc. is 4.89x versus 9.12x for Monster Beverage Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo, Inc. has a net margin of -8.42% compared to Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 10.94%. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.66% beat PepsiCo, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.53%.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $66.00, signalling upside risk potential of 53.63%. On the other hand PepsiCo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $153.91 which suggests that it could grow by 3.95%. Given that Celsius Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, Inc., analysts believe Celsius Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than PepsiCo, Inc..

Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo, Inc. has a beta of 0.420, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.023%.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo, Inc. offers a yield of 3.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Celsius Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo, Inc. pays out 76.68% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $725.1M, which are smaller than PepsiCo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.9B. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$61M is lower than PepsiCo, Inc.'s net income of $2.6B. Notably, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 462.05x while PepsiCo, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings, Inc. is 4.89x versus 2.20x for PepsiCo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.