Financhill
Sell
42

CELH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$37.32
Seasonality move :
38.7%
Day range:
$35.26 - $37.34
52-week range:
$21.10 - $98.85
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
115.77x
P/S ratio:
6.54x
P/B ratio:
21.39x
Volume:
6.2M
Avg. volume:
7.8M
1-year change:
-55.2%
Market cap:
$9.5B
Revenue:
$1.4B
EPS (TTM):
$0.32

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CELH
Celsius Holdings
$342.3M $0.19 56.91% -1.47% $42.84
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper
$3.6B $0.38 5.46% 27.9% $38.62
KO
Coca-Cola
$11.2B $0.72 1.45% 49.43% $77.48
MNST
Monster Beverage
$2B $0.46 9.5% 16.41% $60.3657
PEP
PepsiCo
$17.7B $1.49 -0.98% -7.91% $151.55
ZVIA
Zevia PBC
$37.3M -$0.10 -4.25% -2.5% $4.13
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CELH
Celsius Holdings
$36.77 $42.84 $9.5B 115.77x $0.00 0% 6.54x
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper
$33.54 $38.62 $45.6B 30.49x $0.23 2.7% 2.94x
KO
Coca-Cola
$70.52 $77.48 $303.5B 28.21x $0.51 2.79% 6.49x
MNST
Monster Beverage
$61.0000 $60.3657 $59.5B 37.65x $0.00 0% 8.15x
PEP
PepsiCo
$130.44 $151.55 $178.8B 19.18x $1.36 4.16% 1.96x
ZVIA
Zevia PBC
$2.67 $4.13 $165.4M -- $0.00 0% 1.01x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CELH
Celsius Holdings
-- -2.825 -- 2.95x
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper
39.45% 0.084 34.94% 0.24x
KO
Coca-Cola
65.21% 0.095 15.85% 0.75x
MNST
Monster Beverage
2.96% -0.639 0.35% 2.66x
PEP
PepsiCo
72.52% 0.175 23.55% 0.62x
ZVIA
Zevia PBC
-- 1.054 -- 1.71x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CELH
Celsius Holdings
$172.4M $52M 9.09% 9.09% 15.8% $96.4M
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper
$2B $801M 3.78% 6.11% 22.23% $75M
KO
Coca-Cola
$7B $3.7B 14.82% 39.18% 39.93% -$5.5B
MNST
Monster Beverage
$1B $569.7M 21.71% 23.09% 31.38% $473.2M
PEP
PepsiCo
$10B $2.6B 14.47% 49.28% 14.54% -$1.6B
ZVIA
Zevia PBC
$19.4M -$5.2M -38.47% -38.47% -13.12% -$2M

Celsius Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CELH or KDP?

    Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 14.22%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 6.11%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    52.35% $0.15 $1.3B
    KDP
    Keurig Dr Pepper
    54.61% $0.38 $40.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About CELH or KDP?

    Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $42.84, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $38.62 which suggests that it could grow by 15.13%. Given that Celsius Holdings has higher upside potential than Keurig Dr Pepper, analysts believe Celsius Holdings is more attractive than Keurig Dr Pepper.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    7 6 0
    KDP
    Keurig Dr Pepper
    9 7 0
  • Is CELH or KDP More Risky?

    Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.648, which suggesting that the stock is 64.805% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.516, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.415%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CELH or KDP?

    Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CELH or KDP?

    Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are smaller than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is lower than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $517M. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 115.77x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 30.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 6.54x versus 2.94x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    6.54x 115.77x $329.3M $44.4M
    KDP
    Keurig Dr Pepper
    2.94x 30.49x $3.6B $517M
  • Which has Higher Returns CELH or KO?

    Coca-Cola has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 29.92%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    52.35% $0.15 $1.3B
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    62.59% $0.77 $76.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About CELH or KO?

    Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $42.84, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $77.48 which suggests that it could grow by 9.87%. Given that Celsius Holdings has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Celsius Holdings is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    7 6 0
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    14 4 0
  • Is CELH or KO More Risky?

    Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.648, which suggesting that the stock is 64.805% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.474, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.575%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CELH or KO?

    Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CELH or KO?

    Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 115.77x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 6.54x versus 6.49x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    6.54x 115.77x $329.3M $44.4M
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    6.49x 28.21x $11.1B $3.3B
  • Which has Higher Returns CELH or MNST?

    Monster Beverage has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 23.89%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 23.09%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    52.35% $0.15 $1.3B
    MNST
    Monster Beverage
    56.51% $0.45 $6.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About CELH or MNST?

    Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $42.84, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $60.3657 which suggests that it could fall by -1.04%. Given that Celsius Holdings has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Celsius Holdings is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    7 6 0
    MNST
    Monster Beverage
    9 10 1
  • Is CELH or MNST More Risky?

    Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.648, which suggesting that the stock is 64.805% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.095%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CELH or MNST?

    Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Celsius Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CELH or MNST?

    Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are smaller than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is lower than Monster Beverage's net income of $443M. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 115.77x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 37.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 6.54x versus 8.15x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    6.54x 115.77x $329.3M $44.4M
    MNST
    Monster Beverage
    8.15x 37.65x $1.9B $443M
  • Which has Higher Returns CELH or PEP?

    PepsiCo has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 10.24%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    52.35% $0.15 $1.3B
    PEP
    PepsiCo
    55.77% $1.33 $67B
  • What do Analysts Say About CELH or PEP?

    Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $42.84, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $151.55 which suggests that it could grow by 16.18%. Given that Celsius Holdings has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe Celsius Holdings is more attractive than PepsiCo.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    7 6 0
    PEP
    PepsiCo
    4 16 1
  • Is CELH or PEP More Risky?

    Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.648, which suggesting that the stock is 64.805% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.85%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CELH or PEP?

    Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CELH or PEP?

    Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 115.77x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 6.54x versus 1.96x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    6.54x 115.77x $329.3M $44.4M
    PEP
    PepsiCo
    1.96x 19.18x $17.9B $1.8B
  • Which has Higher Returns CELH or ZVIA?

    Zevia PBC has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of -14.61%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat Zevia PBC's return on equity of -38.47%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    52.35% $0.15 $1.3B
    ZVIA
    Zevia PBC
    49.21% -$0.09 $42.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About CELH or ZVIA?

    Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $42.84, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand Zevia PBC has an analysts' consensus of $4.13 which suggests that it could grow by 54.49%. Given that Zevia PBC has higher upside potential than Celsius Holdings, analysts believe Zevia PBC is more attractive than Celsius Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    7 6 0
    ZVIA
    Zevia PBC
    2 3 0
  • Is CELH or ZVIA More Risky?

    Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.648, which suggesting that the stock is 64.805% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zevia PBC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CELH or ZVIA?

    Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zevia PBC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Zevia PBC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Celsius Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CELH or ZVIA?

    Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are larger than Zevia PBC quarterly revenues of $39.5M. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is higher than Zevia PBC's net income of -$5.8M. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 115.77x while Zevia PBC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 6.54x versus 1.01x for Zevia PBC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    6.54x 115.77x $329.3M $44.4M
    ZVIA
    Zevia PBC
    1.01x -- $39.5M -$5.8M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Lucid Group Stock a Millionaire Maker?
Is Lucid Group Stock a Millionaire Maker?

Lucid Group (LCID) is an EV manufacturer with a focus…

Is Enovix an Underrated Small Cap?
Is Enovix an Underrated Small Cap?

Enovix (NASDAQ:ENVX) is one of several small, innovative companies hoping…

Are We Heading Toward a Recession?
Are We Heading Toward a Recession?

Fears of a recession in 2025 grew at the end…

Stock Ideas

Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 12

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 28.41% over the past day.

Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 12

Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is down 10.23% over the past day.

Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 12

Onto Innovation [ONTO] is up 5.65% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock