MBC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -6.52% compared to MasterBrand, Inc.'s net margin of 1.39%. MasterBrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 2% beat Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.24%.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.59, signalling upside risk potential of 35.5%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 49.89%. Given that Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than MasterBrand, Inc., analysts believe Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. is more attractive than MasterBrand, Inc..

MasterBrand, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.949, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.078%.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 5.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. MasterBrand, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. pays out 113.99% of its earnings as a dividend.

MasterBrand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $644.6M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $80.3M. MasterBrand, Inc.'s net income of -$42M is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s net income of $1.1M. Notably, MasterBrand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.90x while Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterBrand, Inc. is 0.40x versus 0.36x for Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. has a net margin of -6.52% compared to MasterBrand, Inc.'s net margin of 7.83%. MasterBrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 2% beat Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.21%.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.59, signalling upside risk potential of 35.5%. On the other hand Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.59%. Given that MasterBrand, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc., analysts believe MasterBrand, Inc. is more attractive than Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc..

MasterBrand, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.97%.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. offers a yield of 6.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. MasterBrand, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. pays out 77.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MasterBrand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $644.6M, which are larger than Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. quarterly revenues of $149.9M. MasterBrand, Inc.'s net income of -$42M is lower than Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc.'s net income of $11.7M. Notably, MasterBrand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.90x while Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterBrand, Inc. is 0.40x versus 0.96x for Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -6.52% compared to MasterBrand, Inc.'s net margin of -39.62%. MasterBrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 2% beat Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -256.16%.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.59, signalling upside risk potential of 35.5%. On the other hand Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MasterBrand, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marwynn Holdings, Inc., analysts believe MasterBrand, Inc. is more attractive than Marwynn Holdings, Inc..

MasterBrand, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marwynn Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MasterBrand, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marwynn Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MasterBrand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $644.6M, which are larger than Marwynn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4M. MasterBrand, Inc.'s net income of -$42M is lower than Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$548.3K. Notably, MasterBrand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.90x while Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterBrand, Inc. is 0.40x versus 1.81x for Marwynn Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regional Brands, Inc. has a net margin of -6.52% compared to MasterBrand, Inc.'s net margin of --. MasterBrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 2% beat Regional Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.59, signalling upside risk potential of 35.5%. On the other hand Regional Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MasterBrand, Inc. has higher upside potential than Regional Brands, Inc., analysts believe MasterBrand, Inc. is more attractive than Regional Brands, Inc..

MasterBrand, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regional Brands, Inc. has a beta of -0.033, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.294%.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Regional Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $12.00 per share. MasterBrand, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Regional Brands, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MasterBrand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $644.6M, which are larger than Regional Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. MasterBrand, Inc.'s net income of -$42M is higher than Regional Brands, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, MasterBrand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.90x while Regional Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterBrand, Inc. is 0.40x versus 0.66x for Regional Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.