CLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Metals Co. has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net margin of 7.18%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.11% beat Commercial Metals Co.'s return on equity of 2.05%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.81, signalling downside risk potential of -3.11%. On the other hand Commercial Metals Co. has an analysts' consensus of $72.25 which suggests that it could grow by 3.97%. Given that Commercial Metals Co. has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc., analysts believe Commercial Metals Co. is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc..

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.974, which suggesting that the stock is 97.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals Co. has a beta of 1.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.554%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Metals Co. offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals Co. pays out 97.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Commercial Metals Co. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$231M is lower than Commercial Metals Co.'s net income of $151.8M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Commercial Metals Co.'s PE ratio is 91.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is 0.35x versus 1.01x for Commercial Metals Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor Corp. has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net margin of 7.99%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.11% beat Nucor Corp.'s return on equity of 9.09%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.81, signalling downside risk potential of -3.11%. On the other hand Nucor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $177.46 which suggests that it could grow by 11.51%. Given that Nucor Corp. has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc., analysts believe Nucor Corp. is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc..

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.974, which suggesting that the stock is 97.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor Corp. has a beta of 1.855, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.522%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nucor Corp. offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp. pays out 25.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Nucor Corp. quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$231M is lower than Nucor Corp.'s net income of $681M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Nucor Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is 0.35x versus 1.16x for Nucor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net margin of 8.37%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.11% beat Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.68%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.81, signalling downside risk potential of -3.11%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $180.78 which suggests that it could grow by 3.73%. Given that Steel Dynamics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc., analysts believe Steel Dynamics, Inc. is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc..

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.974, which suggesting that the stock is 97.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.52%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics, Inc. offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays out 18.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$231M is lower than Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $403.9M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is 0.35x versus 1.48x for Steel Dynamics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net margin of 2.47%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.11% beat Worthington Steel, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.64%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.81, signalling downside risk potential of -3.11%. On the other hand Worthington Steel, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.85%. Given that Worthington Steel, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc., analysts believe Worthington Steel, Inc. is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc..

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.974, which suggesting that the stock is 97.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worthington Steel, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Worthington Steel, Inc. offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc. pays out 29.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Worthington Steel, Inc. quarterly revenues of $871.9M. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$231M is lower than Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net income of $21.5M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Worthington Steel, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is 0.35x versus 0.56x for Worthington Steel, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.