STLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Metals Co. has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 7.18%. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.68% beat Commercial Metals Co.'s return on equity of 2.05%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $180.78, signalling upside risk potential of 2.85%. On the other hand Commercial Metals Co. has an analysts' consensus of $72.25 which suggests that it could grow by 2.53%. Given that Steel Dynamics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Commercial Metals Co., analysts believe Steel Dynamics, Inc. is more attractive than Commercial Metals Co..

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.465, which suggesting that the stock is 46.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals Co. has a beta of 1.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.554%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Commercial Metals Co. offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays 18.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals Co. pays out 97.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Commercial Metals Co. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $403.9M is higher than Commercial Metals Co.'s net income of $151.8M. Notably, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.32x while Commercial Metals Co.'s PE ratio is 92.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics, Inc. is 1.50x versus 1.03x for Commercial Metals Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 1.45%. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.68% beat Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $180.78, signalling upside risk potential of 2.85%. On the other hand Friedman Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Steel Dynamics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Steel Dynamics, Inc. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.465, which suggesting that the stock is 46.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.552, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.197%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Friedman Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays 18.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $152.4M. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $403.9M is higher than Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.32x while Friedman Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics, Inc. is 1.50x versus 0.28x for Friedman Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor Corp. has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 7.99%. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.68% beat Nucor Corp.'s return on equity of 9.09%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $180.78, signalling upside risk potential of 2.85%. On the other hand Nucor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $177.46 which suggests that it could grow by 7.8%. Given that Nucor Corp. has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe Nucor Corp. is more attractive than Steel Dynamics, Inc..

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.465, which suggesting that the stock is 46.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor Corp. has a beta of 1.855, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.522%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Nucor Corp. offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays 18.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp. pays out 25.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than Nucor Corp. quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $403.9M is lower than Nucor Corp.'s net income of $681M. Notably, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.32x while Nucor Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics, Inc. is 1.50x versus 1.20x for Nucor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance, Inc. has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 5.2%. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.68% beat Reliance, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.07%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $180.78, signalling upside risk potential of 2.85%. On the other hand Reliance, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $315.63 which suggests that it could grow by 6.8%. Given that Reliance, Inc. has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe Reliance, Inc. is more attractive than Steel Dynamics, Inc..

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.465, which suggesting that the stock is 46.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance, Inc. has a beta of 0.919, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.125%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Reliance, Inc. offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays 18.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance, Inc. pays out 28.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Reliance, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $403.9M is higher than Reliance, Inc.'s net income of $190M. Notably, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.32x while Reliance, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics, Inc. is 1.50x versus 1.13x for Reliance, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.