LSH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has a net margin of -22.25% compared to Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s net margin of -363.28%. Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -166.55% beat Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.51%.

Lakeside Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3650%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lakeside Holding Ltd., analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. is more attractive than Lakeside Holding Ltd..

Lakeside Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lakeside Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lakeside Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lakeside Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $6.1M, which are larger than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. quarterly revenues of $361.9K. Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s net income of -$1.4M is lower than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeside Holding Ltd. is 0.44x versus 3.05x for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has a net margin of -22.25% compared to Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s net margin of -2.64%. Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -166.55% beat Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.26%.

Lakeside Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.33 which suggests that it could grow by 26.5%. Given that Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lakeside Holding Ltd., analysts believe Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. is more attractive than Lakeside Holding Ltd..

Lakeside Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lakeside Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lakeside Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lakeside Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $6.1M, which are smaller than Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $114.3M. Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s net income of -$1.4M is higher than Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$3M. Notably, Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 111.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeside Holding Ltd. is 0.44x versus 0.64x for Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a net margin of -22.25% compared to Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 0.56%. Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -166.55% beat Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.96%.

Lakeside Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Radiant Logistics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.33 which suggests that it could grow by 28.8%. Given that Radiant Logistics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lakeside Holding Ltd., analysts believe Radiant Logistics, Inc. is more attractive than Lakeside Holding Ltd..

Lakeside Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.449%.

Lakeside Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Radiant Logistics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lakeside Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lakeside Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $6.1M, which are smaller than Radiant Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $226.7M. Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s net income of -$1.4M is lower than Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M. Notably, Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeside Holding Ltd. is 0.44x versus 0.34x for Radiant Logistics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Volato Group, Inc. has a net margin of -22.25% compared to Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 10.8%. Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -166.55% beat Volato Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Lakeside Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Volato Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lakeside Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Volato Group, Inc., analysts believe Lakeside Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Volato Group, Inc..

Lakeside Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Volato Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lakeside Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Volato Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lakeside Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Volato Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lakeside Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $6.1M, which are larger than Volato Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $381K. Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s net income of -$1.4M is lower than Volato Group, Inc.'s net income of $2.3M. Notably, Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Volato Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeside Holding Ltd. is 0.44x versus 0.14x for Volato Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.