RLGT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. has a net margin of 0.56% compared to Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of 3.48%. Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.96% beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.82%.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.33, signalling upside risk potential of 22.55%. On the other hand C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $183.35 which suggests that it could fall by -5.95%. Given that Radiant Logistics, Inc. has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., analysts believe Radiant Logistics, Inc. is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc..

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.734, which suggesting that the stock is 26.621% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. has a beta of 0.911, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.905%.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Radiant Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. pays out 51.55% of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $226.7M, which are smaller than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M is lower than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s net income of $136.3M. Notably, Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.83x while C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s PE ratio is 40.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radiant Logistics, Inc. is 0.36x versus 1.46x for C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forward Air Corp. has a net margin of 0.56% compared to Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of -3.76%. Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.96% beat Forward Air Corp.'s return on equity of -55.76%.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.33, signalling upside risk potential of 22.55%. On the other hand Forward Air Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $35.67 which suggests that it could grow by 27.93%. Given that Forward Air Corp. has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Forward Air Corp. is more attractive than Radiant Logistics, Inc..

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.734, which suggesting that the stock is 26.621% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Air Corp. has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.176%.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forward Air Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Radiant Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $226.7M, which are smaller than Forward Air Corp. quarterly revenues of $631.8M. Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M is higher than Forward Air Corp.'s net income of -$23.8M. Notably, Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.83x while Forward Air Corp.'s PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radiant Logistics, Inc. is 0.36x versus 0.34x for Forward Air Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hub Group, Inc. has a net margin of 0.56% compared to Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of 3.1%. Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.96% beat Hub Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.21%.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.33, signalling upside risk potential of 22.55%. On the other hand Hub Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $48.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.6%. Given that Radiant Logistics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hub Group, Inc., analysts believe Radiant Logistics, Inc. is more attractive than Hub Group, Inc..

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.734, which suggesting that the stock is 26.621% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.473%.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hub Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Radiant Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group, Inc. pays out 29.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $226.7M, which are smaller than Hub Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $934.5M. Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M is lower than Hub Group, Inc.'s net income of $28.9M. Notably, Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.83x while Hub Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radiant Logistics, Inc. is 0.36x versus 0.78x for Hub Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Singularity Future Technology Ltd. has a net margin of 0.56% compared to Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of -3079.54%. Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.96% beat Singularity Future Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -122.81%.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.33, signalling upside risk potential of 22.55%. On the other hand Singularity Future Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1480.56%. Given that Singularity Future Technology Ltd. has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Singularity Future Technology Ltd. is more attractive than Radiant Logistics, Inc..

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.734, which suggesting that the stock is 26.621% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Singularity Future Technology Ltd. has a beta of 2.311, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.109%.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Singularity Future Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Radiant Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Singularity Future Technology Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $226.7M, which are larger than Singularity Future Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of $307.9K. Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M is higher than Singularity Future Technology Ltd.'s net income of -$9.5M. Notably, Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.83x while Singularity Future Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radiant Logistics, Inc. is 0.36x versus 1.33x for Singularity Future Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.