CTNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lakeside Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -363.28% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s net margin of -22.25%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.51% beat Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -166.55%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3650%. On the other hand Lakeside Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lakeside Holding Ltd., analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. is more attractive than Lakeside Holding Ltd..

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lakeside Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lakeside Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lakeside Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. quarterly revenues are $361.9K, which are smaller than Lakeside Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of $6.1M. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3M is higher than Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. is 3.05x versus 0.44x for Lakeside Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has a net margin of -363.28% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s net margin of -2.64%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.51% beat Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.26%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3650%. On the other hand Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.33 which suggests that it could grow by 26.5%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has higher upside potential than Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. is more attractive than Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc..

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. quarterly revenues are $361.9K, which are smaller than Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $114.3M. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3M is higher than Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$3M. Notably, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 111.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. is 3.05x versus 0.64x for Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a net margin of -363.28% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s net margin of 0.56%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.51% beat Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.96%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3650%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.33 which suggests that it could grow by 28.8%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. is more attractive than Radiant Logistics, Inc..

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.449%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Radiant Logistics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. quarterly revenues are $361.9K, which are smaller than Radiant Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $226.7M. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3M is lower than Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M. Notably, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. is 3.05x versus 0.34x for Radiant Logistics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Volato Group, Inc. has a net margin of -363.28% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s net margin of 10.8%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.51% beat Volato Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3650%. On the other hand Volato Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has higher upside potential than Volato Group, Inc., analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. is more attractive than Volato Group, Inc..

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Volato Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Volato Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Volato Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. quarterly revenues are $361.9K, which are smaller than Volato Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $381K. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3M is lower than Volato Group, Inc.'s net income of $2.3M. Notably, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Volato Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. is 3.05x versus 0.14x for Volato Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.