PAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has a net margin of -2.64% compared to Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of -363.28%. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.26% beat Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.51%.

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.33, signalling upside risk potential of 26.5%. On the other hand Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3650%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has higher upside potential than Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. is more attractive than Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc..

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $114.3M, which are larger than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc. quarterly revenues of $361.9K. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$3M is lower than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 111.41x while Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. is 0.64x versus 3.05x for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hub Group, Inc. has a net margin of -2.64% compared to Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of 3.1%. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.26% beat Hub Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.21%.

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.33, signalling upside risk potential of 26.5%. On the other hand Hub Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $41.29 which suggests that it could fall by -5.74%. Given that Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hub Group, Inc., analysts believe Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. is more attractive than Hub Group, Inc..

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.157, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.727%.

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hub Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group, Inc. pays out 29.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $114.3M, which are smaller than Hub Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $934.5M. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$3M is lower than Hub Group, Inc.'s net income of $28.9M. Notably, Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 111.41x while Hub Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. is 0.64x versus 0.71x for Hub Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lakeside Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -2.64% compared to Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of -22.25%. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.26% beat Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -166.55%.

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.33, signalling upside risk potential of 26.5%. On the other hand Lakeside Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lakeside Holding Ltd., analysts believe Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. is more attractive than Lakeside Holding Ltd..

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lakeside Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lakeside Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lakeside Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $114.3M, which are larger than Lakeside Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of $6.1M. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$3M is lower than Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 111.41x while Lakeside Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. is 0.64x versus 0.44x for Lakeside Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -2.64% compared to Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of -18.84%. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.26% beat Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.38%.

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.33, signalling upside risk potential of 26.5%. On the other hand Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.78%. Given that Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. is more attractive than Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc..

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.741%.

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. pays out 8.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $114.3M, which are smaller than Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $396.8M. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$3M is higher than Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$74.8M. Notably, Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 111.41x while Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. is 0.64x versus 0.26x for Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.