Financhill
Sell
46

RUSH.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.1600
Seasonality move :
72.54%
Day range:
$0.1500 - $0.1650
52-week range:
$0.0600 - $0.2000
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
10.20x
Volume:
70.5K
Avg. volume:
53.7K
1-year change:
114.29%
Market cap:
$8.9M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.03

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
RUSH.V
Carolina Rush Corp.
-- -- -- -- $0.5000
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
-- -- -- -- --
KRN.TO
Karnalyte Resources, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
$7.2B $1.24 -2.29% 2059.63% $101.07
OGC.TO
OceanaGold Corp.
$843.5M $1.36 86.14% 671.96% $63.31
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
RUSH.V
Carolina Rush Corp.
$0.1500 $0.5000 $8.9M -- $0.00 0% --
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
$0.0050 -- $1M -- $0.00 0% 2.35x
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
$0.11 -- $17.6M 151.77x $0.00 0% 2.58x
KRN.TO
Karnalyte Resources, Inc.
$0.24 -- $12.8M -- $0.00 0% --
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
$101.68 $101.07 $49B 15.74x $0.75 2.99% 1.32x
OGC.TO
OceanaGold Corp.
$53.72 $63.31 $12.4B 15.95x $0.12 0.31% 7.18x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
RUSH.V
Carolina Rush Corp.
-- -3.626 -- 0.14x
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
21.47% 0.000 5.8% 0.39x
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
41.88% 4.533 33.1% 0.25x
KRN.TO
Karnalyte Resources, Inc.
-- -6.369 -- 1.34x
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
32.19% 0.384 40.29% 0.54x
OGC.TO
OceanaGold Corp.
2.16% 2.504 0.75% 0.98x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
RUSH.V
Carolina Rush Corp.
-- -$335.2K -3766.29% -3766.29% -- -$235K
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
$50K -$390.8K -138.99% -167.71% 88.71% $38.2K
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
-$558.4K -$1.2M -45.73% -65.23% -60.25% -$630.3K
KRN.TO
Karnalyte Resources, Inc.
-$18K -$319K -22.71% -22.71% -- -$448K
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
$2.6B $1B 5.94% 9.16% 13.84% $3.1B
OGC.TO
OceanaGold Corp.
$479.5M $410.4M 29.65% 30.49% 45.11% $362.2M

Carolina Rush Corp. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns RUSH.V or BEE.CX?

    Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Carolina Rush Corp.'s net margin of 25.53%. Carolina Rush Corp.'s return on equity of -3766.29% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s return on equity of -167.71%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RUSH.V
    Carolina Rush Corp.
    -- -$0.01 -$726.9K
    BEE.CX
    Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
    61.05% $0.00 $1.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About RUSH.V or BEE.CX?

    Carolina Rush Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.5000, signalling upside risk potential of 233.33%. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Carolina Rush Corp. has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc., analysts believe Carolina Rush Corp. is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RUSH.V
    Carolina Rush Corp.
    0 0 0
    BEE.CX
    Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is RUSH.V or BEE.CX More Risky?

    Carolina Rush Corp. has a beta of -1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 238.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a beta of 0.166, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.42%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RUSH.V or BEE.CX?

    Carolina Rush Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carolina Rush Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RUSH.V or BEE.CX?

    Carolina Rush Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Carolina Rush Corp.'s net income of -$350.7K is lower than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s net income of $20.9K. Notably, Carolina Rush Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carolina Rush Corp. is -- versus 2.35x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RUSH.V
    Carolina Rush Corp.
    -- -- -- -$350.7K
    BEE.CX
    Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
    2.35x -- $81.9K $20.9K
  • Which has Higher Returns RUSH.V or ERTH.CX?

    Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Carolina Rush Corp.'s net margin of -74.66%. Carolina Rush Corp.'s return on equity of -3766.29% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -65.23%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RUSH.V
    Carolina Rush Corp.
    -- -$0.01 -$726.9K
    ERTH.CX
    Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
    -28.19% -$0.01 $15.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About RUSH.V or ERTH.CX?

    Carolina Rush Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.5000, signalling upside risk potential of 233.33%. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 309.09%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Carolina Rush Corp., analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. is more attractive than Carolina Rush Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RUSH.V
    Carolina Rush Corp.
    0 0 0
    ERTH.CX
    Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
    0 0 0
  • Is RUSH.V or ERTH.CX More Risky?

    Carolina Rush Corp. has a beta of -1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 238.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.639, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.89%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RUSH.V or ERTH.CX?

    Carolina Rush Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carolina Rush Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RUSH.V or ERTH.CX?

    Carolina Rush Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $2M. Carolina Rush Corp.'s net income of -$350.7K is higher than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Carolina Rush Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 151.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carolina Rush Corp. is -- versus 2.58x for Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RUSH.V
    Carolina Rush Corp.
    -- -- -- -$350.7K
    ERTH.CX
    Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
    2.58x 151.77x $2M -$1.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns RUSH.V or KRN.TO?

    Karnalyte Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Carolina Rush Corp.'s net margin of --. Carolina Rush Corp.'s return on equity of -3766.29% beat Karnalyte Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -22.71%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RUSH.V
    Carolina Rush Corp.
    -- -$0.01 -$726.9K
    KRN.TO
    Karnalyte Resources, Inc.
    -- -$0.01 $4M
  • What do Analysts Say About RUSH.V or KRN.TO?

    Carolina Rush Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.5000, signalling upside risk potential of 233.33%. On the other hand Karnalyte Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Carolina Rush Corp. has higher upside potential than Karnalyte Resources, Inc., analysts believe Carolina Rush Corp. is more attractive than Karnalyte Resources, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RUSH.V
    Carolina Rush Corp.
    0 0 0
    KRN.TO
    Karnalyte Resources, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is RUSH.V or KRN.TO More Risky?

    Carolina Rush Corp. has a beta of -1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 238.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Karnalyte Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.955%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RUSH.V or KRN.TO?

    Carolina Rush Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Karnalyte Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carolina Rush Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Karnalyte Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RUSH.V or KRN.TO?

    Carolina Rush Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Karnalyte Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Carolina Rush Corp.'s net income of -$350.7K is higher than Karnalyte Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$509K. Notably, Carolina Rush Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Karnalyte Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carolina Rush Corp. is -- versus -- for Karnalyte Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RUSH.V
    Carolina Rush Corp.
    -- -- -- -$350.7K
    KRN.TO
    Karnalyte Resources, Inc.
    -- -- -- -$509K
  • Which has Higher Returns RUSH.V or NTR.TO?

    Nutrien Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Carolina Rush Corp.'s net margin of 10.86%. Carolina Rush Corp.'s return on equity of -3766.29% beat Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.16%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RUSH.V
    Carolina Rush Corp.
    -- -$0.01 -$726.9K
    NTR.TO
    Nutrien Ltd.
    35.36% $1.65 $51.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About RUSH.V or NTR.TO?

    Carolina Rush Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.5000, signalling upside risk potential of 233.33%. On the other hand Nutrien Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $101.07 which suggests that it could fall by -0.6%. Given that Carolina Rush Corp. has higher upside potential than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe Carolina Rush Corp. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RUSH.V
    Carolina Rush Corp.
    0 0 0
    NTR.TO
    Nutrien Ltd.
    8 11 1
  • Is RUSH.V or NTR.TO More Risky?

    Carolina Rush Corp. has a beta of -1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 238.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.899%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RUSH.V or NTR.TO?

    Carolina Rush Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nutrien Ltd. offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Carolina Rush Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nutrien Ltd. pays out 46.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Nutrien Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RUSH.V or NTR.TO?

    Carolina Rush Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Carolina Rush Corp.'s net income of -$350.7K is lower than Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $808.7M. Notably, Carolina Rush Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nutrien Ltd.'s PE ratio is 15.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carolina Rush Corp. is -- versus 1.32x for Nutrien Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RUSH.V
    Carolina Rush Corp.
    -- -- -- -$350.7K
    NTR.TO
    Nutrien Ltd.
    1.32x 15.74x $7.4B $808.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns RUSH.V or OGC.TO?

    OceanaGold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Carolina Rush Corp.'s net margin of 51.17%. Carolina Rush Corp.'s return on equity of -3766.29% beat OceanaGold Corp.'s return on equity of 30.49%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RUSH.V
    Carolina Rush Corp.
    -- -$0.01 -$726.9K
    OGC.TO
    OceanaGold Corp.
    52.71% $1.98 $3.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About RUSH.V or OGC.TO?

    Carolina Rush Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.5000, signalling upside risk potential of 233.33%. On the other hand OceanaGold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $63.31 which suggests that it could grow by 17.84%. Given that Carolina Rush Corp. has higher upside potential than OceanaGold Corp., analysts believe Carolina Rush Corp. is more attractive than OceanaGold Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RUSH.V
    Carolina Rush Corp.
    0 0 0
    OGC.TO
    OceanaGold Corp.
    5 1 0
  • Is RUSH.V or OGC.TO More Risky?

    Carolina Rush Corp. has a beta of -1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 238.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OceanaGold Corp. has a beta of 1.268, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.777%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RUSH.V or OGC.TO?

    Carolina Rush Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OceanaGold Corp. offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Carolina Rush Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OceanaGold Corp. pays out 6.53% of its earnings as a dividend. OceanaGold Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RUSH.V or OGC.TO?

    Carolina Rush Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than OceanaGold Corp. quarterly revenues of $909.7M. Carolina Rush Corp.'s net income of -$350.7K is lower than OceanaGold Corp.'s net income of $465.4M. Notably, Carolina Rush Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while OceanaGold Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carolina Rush Corp. is -- versus 7.18x for OceanaGold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RUSH.V
    Carolina Rush Corp.
    -- -- -- -$350.7K
    OGC.TO
    OceanaGold Corp.
    7.18x 15.95x $909.7M $465.4M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?

Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…

Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?

Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…

Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?

Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…

Stock Ideas

Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x

Alerts

Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4

Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 3.64% over the past day.

Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4

Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 5.43% over the past day.

Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4

Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 1.4% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock