Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Buy
60
NTR.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$95.04
Seasonality move
:
2.21%
Day range:
$92.64 - $93.94
52-week range:
$65.35 - $98.67
Dividend yield:
3.25%
P/E ratio:
18.25x
P/S ratio:
1.23x
P/B ratio:
1.30x
Volume:
2.1M
Avg. volume:
2.1M
1-year change:
29.6%
Market cap:
$45.3B
Revenue:
$35.6B
EPS (TTM):
$5.13
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
|
$3.9B | $0.67 | -48.9% | 976.23% | $91.81 |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$2.5B | $1.93 | -20.2% | 6.26% | $165.08 |
|
CFP.TO
Canfor Corp.
|
$1.2B | -$1.02 | -13.85% | -140.77% | $16.17 |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$368.5M | $0.17 | -14.29% | 100.77% | $9.38 |
|
IFP.TO
Interfor Corp.
|
$545.8M | -$1.17 | -10.26% | -97.83% | $12.83 |
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$1.5B | $0.42 | -30.13% | 35.82% | $25.80 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
|
$93.69 | $91.81 | $45.3B | 18.25x | $0.75 | 3.25% | 1.23x |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$268.94 | $165.08 | $135B | 28.13x | $0.56 | 0.83% | 9.17x |
|
CFP.TO
Canfor Corp.
|
$15.39 | $16.17 | $1.8B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.34x |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$14.21 | $9.38 | $4.3B | 13.77x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.14x |
|
IFP.TO
Interfor Corp.
|
$11.64 | $12.83 | $765.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.20x |
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$43.81 | $25.80 | $52.9B | 21.92x | $0.05 | 0.4% | 5.98x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
|
36.08% | 0.030 | 49.78% | 0.81x |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
1.41% | 0.642 | 0.4% | 1.13x |
|
CFP.TO
Canfor Corp.
|
24.91% | -0.781 | 56.38% | 0.45x |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
11.65% | 0.434 | 7.62% | 2.35x |
|
IFP.TO
Interfor Corp.
|
43.31% | 0.071 | 183.45% | 0.48x |
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
13.66% | 1.629 | 4.17% | 1.48x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
|
$2.7B | $1.1B | 4.69% | 7.35% | 13.33% | -$1.3B |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$2.4B | $2.3B | 15.08% | 15.8% | 53.69% | $1.6B |
|
CFP.TO
Canfor Corp.
|
-$71.5M | -$108.9M | -11.21% | -13.72% | -8.64% | -$28.9M |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$180.4M | $145M | 14.87% | 16.82% | 42.05% | $86.6M |
|
IFP.TO
Interfor Corp.
|
-$42.5M | -$54.7M | -12.21% | -20.04% | -7.94% | -$71.1M |
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$1.2B | $1.1B | 21.05% | 24.97% | 42.8% | $922.9M |
Nutrien Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NTR.TO or AEM.TO?
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of 34.48%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.35% beat Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTR.TONutrien Ltd.32.7% $1.32 $54.7B AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.56.57% $2.89 $33.2B -
What do Analysts Say About NTR.TO or AEM.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $91.81, signalling downside risk potential of -47.38%. On the other hand Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $165.08 which suggests that it could fall by -38.62%. Given that Nutrien Ltd. has more downside risk than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd., analysts believe Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTR.TONutrien Ltd.9 9 1 AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.11 5 1 -
Is NTR.TO or AEM.TO More Risky?
Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.117% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.085%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTR.TO or AEM.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 159.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. pays out 42.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Nutrien Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTR.TO or AEM.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $646M is lower than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.25x while Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is 28.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.23x versus 9.17x for Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTR.TONutrien Ltd.1.23x 18.25x $8.3B $646M AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.9.17x 28.13x $4.2B $1.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns NTR.TO or CFP.TO?
Canfor Corp. has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of -14.61%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.35% beat Canfor Corp.'s return on equity of -13.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTR.TONutrien Ltd.32.7% $1.32 $54.7B CFP.TOCanfor Corp.-5.68% -$1.48 $4.2B -
What do Analysts Say About NTR.TO or CFP.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $91.81, signalling downside risk potential of -47.38%. On the other hand Canfor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $16.17 which suggests that it could grow by 1.8%. Given that Canfor Corp. has higher upside potential than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe Canfor Corp. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTR.TONutrien Ltd.9 9 1 CFP.TOCanfor Corp.2 3 0 -
Is NTR.TO or CFP.TO More Risky?
Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.117% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canfor Corp. has a beta of 1.704, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.405%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTR.TO or CFP.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Canfor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 159.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Canfor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTR.TO or CFP.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Canfor Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $646M is higher than Canfor Corp.'s net income of -$184.1M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.25x while Canfor Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.23x versus 0.34x for Canfor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTR.TONutrien Ltd.1.23x 18.25x $8.3B $646M CFP.TOCanfor Corp.0.34x -- $1.3B -$184.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns NTR.TO or FVI.TO?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of 51.21%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.35% beat Fortuna Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTR.TONutrien Ltd.32.7% $1.32 $54.7B FVI.TOFortuna Mining Corp.52.32% $0.51 $2.6B -
What do Analysts Say About NTR.TO or FVI.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $91.81, signalling downside risk potential of -47.38%. On the other hand Fortuna Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $9.38 which suggests that it could fall by -34.01%. Given that Nutrien Ltd. has more downside risk than Fortuna Mining Corp., analysts believe Fortuna Mining Corp. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTR.TONutrien Ltd.9 9 1 FVI.TOFortuna Mining Corp.1 1 0 -
Is NTR.TO or FVI.TO More Risky?
Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.117% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fortuna Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.548, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.765%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTR.TO or FVI.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Fortuna Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 159.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortuna Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTR.TO or FVI.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Fortuna Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $344.8M. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $646M is higher than Fortuna Mining Corp.'s net income of $176.6M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.25x while Fortuna Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.23x versus 3.14x for Fortuna Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTR.TONutrien Ltd.1.23x 18.25x $8.3B $646M FVI.TOFortuna Mining Corp.3.14x 13.77x $344.8M $176.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns NTR.TO or IFP.TO?
Interfor Corp. has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of -31.31%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.35% beat Interfor Corp.'s return on equity of -20.04%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTR.TONutrien Ltd.32.7% $1.32 $54.7B IFP.TOInterfor Corp.-6.17% -$4.19 $2.2B -
What do Analysts Say About NTR.TO or IFP.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $91.81, signalling downside risk potential of -47.38%. On the other hand Interfor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $12.83 which suggests that it could grow by 7.39%. Given that Interfor Corp. has higher upside potential than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe Interfor Corp. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTR.TONutrien Ltd.9 9 1 IFP.TOInterfor Corp.2 1 1 -
Is NTR.TO or IFP.TO More Risky?
Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.117% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interfor Corp. has a beta of 1.966, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.59%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTR.TO or IFP.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Interfor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 159.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Interfor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTR.TO or IFP.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Interfor Corp. quarterly revenues of $689.3M. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $646M is higher than Interfor Corp.'s net income of -$215.8M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.25x while Interfor Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.23x versus 0.20x for Interfor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTR.TONutrien Ltd.1.23x 18.25x $8.3B $646M IFP.TOInterfor Corp.0.20x -- $689.3M -$215.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns NTR.TO or K.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of 33.8%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.35% beat Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTR.TONutrien Ltd.32.7% $1.32 $54.7B K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B -
What do Analysts Say About NTR.TO or K.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $91.81, signalling downside risk potential of -47.38%. On the other hand Kinross Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $25.80 which suggests that it could fall by -41.1%. Given that Nutrien Ltd. has more downside risk than Kinross Gold Corp., analysts believe Kinross Gold Corp. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTR.TONutrien Ltd.9 9 1 K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 -
Is NTR.TO or K.TO More Risky?
Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.117% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.895%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTR.TO or K.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Kinross Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 159.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold Corp. pays out 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Nutrien Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTR.TO or K.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $646M is lower than Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.25x while Kinross Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.23x versus 5.98x for Kinross Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTR.TONutrien Ltd.1.23x 18.25x $8.3B $646M K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.98x 21.92x $2.5B $838.9M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Sell
40
BILL alert for Feb 9
Bill Holdings, Inc. [BILL] is up 3.7% over the past day.
Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 9
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is down 2.16% over the past day.
Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 9
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 2.59% over the past day.
