Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Sell
46
NTR.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$85.00
Seasonality move
:
6.02%
Day range:
$81.70 - $85.88
52-week range:
$62.89 - $88.03
Dividend yield:
3.6%
P/E ratio:
16.59x
P/S ratio:
1.12x
P/B ratio:
1.18x
Volume:
2.4M
Avg. volume:
1.7M
1-year change:
24.09%
Market cap:
$41.2B
Revenue:
$35.6B
EPS (TTM):
$5.13
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
|
$7.9B | $1.36 | 2.2% | 299.11% | $89.83 |
|
AAUC.TO
Allied Gold Corp. (Canada)
|
$423.8M | $0.51 | 63.69% | 967.82% | $39.08 |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$4.1B | $2.74 | 50.52% | 142.84% | $269.49 |
|
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
|
$1.1B | $0.17 | 64.65% | 350.3% | $23.59 |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$345.2M | $0.26 | 38.25% | 713.82% | $13.58 |
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$2.5B | $0.55 | 42.84% | 147.78% | $41.53 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
|
$85.16 | $89.83 | $41.2B | 16.59x | $0.76 | 3.6% | 1.12x |
|
AAUC.TO
Allied Gold Corp. (Canada)
|
$32.22 | $39.08 | $3.7B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.74x |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$231.76 | $269.49 | $116.4B | 24.25x | $0.56 | 0.97% | 7.91x |
|
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
|
$19.22 | $23.59 | $15.1B | 298.45x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.31x |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$13.21 | $13.58 | $4.1B | 12.80x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.92x |
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$38.82 | $41.53 | $46.9B | 19.42x | $0.05 | 0.45% | 5.30x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
|
36.08% | 0.784 | 49.78% | 0.81x |
|
AAUC.TO
Allied Gold Corp. (Canada)
|
29.51% | 3.191 | 6.59% | 0.41x |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
1.41% | 1.516 | 0.4% | 1.13x |
|
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
|
25.8% | 3.689 | 22.09% | 0.37x |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
11.65% | 1.300 | 7.62% | 2.35x |
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
13.66% | 2.146 | 4.17% | 1.48x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
|
$2.7B | $1.1B | 4.69% | 7.35% | 13.33% | -$1.3B |
|
AAUC.TO
Allied Gold Corp. (Canada)
|
$147.8M | $108.4M | 1.99% | 2.61% | 25.76% | $72.2M |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$2.4B | $2.3B | 15.08% | 15.8% | 53.69% | $1.6B |
|
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
|
$369.4M | $282.6M | 1.01% | 1.42% | 25.05% | -$40.9M |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$180.4M | $145M | 14.87% | 16.82% | 42.05% | $86.6M |
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$1.2B | $1.1B | 21.05% | 24.97% | 42.8% | $922.9M |
Nutrien Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NTR.TO or AAUC.TO?
Allied Gold Corp. (Canada) has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of -2.41%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.35% beat Allied Gold Corp. (Canada)'s return on equity of 2.61%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTR.TONutrien Ltd.32.7% $1.32 $54.7B AAUC.TOAllied Gold Corp. (Canada)35.1% -$0.21 $775.6M -
What do Analysts Say About NTR.TO or AAUC.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $89.83, signalling upside risk potential of 5.48%. On the other hand Allied Gold Corp. (Canada) has an analysts' consensus of $39.08 which suggests that it could grow by 21.28%. Given that Allied Gold Corp. (Canada) has higher upside potential than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe Allied Gold Corp. (Canada) is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTR.TONutrien Ltd.9 11 1 AAUC.TOAllied Gold Corp. (Canada)3 0 0 -
Is NTR.TO or AAUC.TO More Risky?
Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.436% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allied Gold Corp. (Canada) has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTR.TO or AAUC.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Allied Gold Corp. (Canada) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 159.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Allied Gold Corp. (Canada) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTR.TO or AAUC.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Allied Gold Corp. (Canada) quarterly revenues of $420.9M. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $646M is higher than Allied Gold Corp. (Canada)'s net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.59x while Allied Gold Corp. (Canada)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.12x versus 3.74x for Allied Gold Corp. (Canada). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTR.TONutrien Ltd.1.12x 16.59x $8.3B $646M AAUC.TOAllied Gold Corp. (Canada)3.74x -- $420.9M -$10.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns NTR.TO or AEM.TO?
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of 34.48%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.35% beat Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTR.TONutrien Ltd.32.7% $1.32 $54.7B AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.56.57% $2.89 $33.2B -
What do Analysts Say About NTR.TO or AEM.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $89.83, signalling upside risk potential of 5.48%. On the other hand Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $269.49 which suggests that it could grow by 16.28%. Given that Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTR.TONutrien Ltd.9 11 1 AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.11 3 1 -
Is NTR.TO or AEM.TO More Risky?
Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.436% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.455%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTR.TO or AEM.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 159.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. pays out 42.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Nutrien Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTR.TO or AEM.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $646M is lower than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.59x while Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.12x versus 7.91x for Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTR.TONutrien Ltd.1.12x 16.59x $8.3B $646M AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.7.91x 24.25x $4.2B $1.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns NTR.TO or EQX.TO?
Equinox Gold Corp. has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of 10.45%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.35% beat Equinox Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 1.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTR.TONutrien Ltd.32.7% $1.32 $54.7B EQX.TOEquinox Gold Corp.32.75% $0.15 $10.5B -
What do Analysts Say About NTR.TO or EQX.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $89.83, signalling upside risk potential of 5.48%. On the other hand Equinox Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $23.59 which suggests that it could grow by 22.73%. Given that Equinox Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe Equinox Gold Corp. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTR.TONutrien Ltd.9 11 1 EQX.TOEquinox Gold Corp.5 0 0 -
Is NTR.TO or EQX.TO More Risky?
Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.436% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equinox Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.943, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.349%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTR.TO or EQX.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Equinox Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 159.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinox Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTR.TO or EQX.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Equinox Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $646M is higher than Equinox Gold Corp.'s net income of $117.9M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.59x while Equinox Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 298.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.12x versus 3.31x for Equinox Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTR.TONutrien Ltd.1.12x 16.59x $8.3B $646M EQX.TOEquinox Gold Corp.3.31x 298.45x $1.1B $117.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns NTR.TO or FVI.TO?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of 51.21%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.35% beat Fortuna Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTR.TONutrien Ltd.32.7% $1.32 $54.7B FVI.TOFortuna Mining Corp.52.32% $0.51 $2.6B -
What do Analysts Say About NTR.TO or FVI.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $89.83, signalling upside risk potential of 5.48%. On the other hand Fortuna Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.58 which suggests that it could grow by 2.8%. Given that Nutrien Ltd. has higher upside potential than Fortuna Mining Corp., analysts believe Nutrien Ltd. is more attractive than Fortuna Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTR.TONutrien Ltd.9 11 1 FVI.TOFortuna Mining Corp.1 0 1 -
Is NTR.TO or FVI.TO More Risky?
Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.436% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fortuna Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.561, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.095%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTR.TO or FVI.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Fortuna Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 159.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortuna Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTR.TO or FVI.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Fortuna Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $344.8M. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $646M is higher than Fortuna Mining Corp.'s net income of $176.6M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.59x while Fortuna Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.12x versus 2.92x for Fortuna Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTR.TONutrien Ltd.1.12x 16.59x $8.3B $646M FVI.TOFortuna Mining Corp.2.92x 12.80x $344.8M $176.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns NTR.TO or K.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of 33.8%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.35% beat Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTR.TONutrien Ltd.32.7% $1.32 $54.7B K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B -
What do Analysts Say About NTR.TO or K.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $89.83, signalling upside risk potential of 5.48%. On the other hand Kinross Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $41.53 which suggests that it could grow by 6.99%. Given that Kinross Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe Kinross Gold Corp. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTR.TONutrien Ltd.9 11 1 K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 -
Is NTR.TO or K.TO More Risky?
Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.436% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.201%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTR.TO or K.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Kinross Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 159.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold Corp. pays out 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Nutrien Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTR.TO or K.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $646M is lower than Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.59x while Kinross Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.12x versus 5.30x for Kinross Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTR.TONutrien Ltd.1.12x 16.59x $8.3B $646M K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.30x 19.42x $2.5B $838.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 17.01% over the past day.
Sell
33
ZBIO alert for Dec 16
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 12.61% over the past day.
Sell
38
HUT alert for Dec 16
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 1.5% over the past day.
