Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
66
NTR.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$100.92
Seasonality move
:
0.13%
Day range:
$100.23 - $103.83
52-week range:
$65.35 - $106.38
Dividend yield:
2.99%
P/E ratio:
15.74x
P/S ratio:
1.32x
P/B ratio:
1.41x
Volume:
1.6M
Avg. volume:
1.7M
1-year change:
41.42%
Market cap:
$49B
Revenue:
$37.6B
EPS (TTM):
$6.46
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
|
$7.2B | $1.24 | -2.29% | 2059.63% | $101.07 |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$4.7B | $3.59 | 55.28% | 93.78% | $325.65 |
|
ASM.TO
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
|
$40.4M | $0.03 | 142.47% | 203.19% | $8.95 |
|
CFP.TO
Canfor Corp.
|
$1.2B | -$1.02 | -13.85% | -140.77% | $16.17 |
|
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
|
$1.3B | $0.30 | 88.36% | 252.38% | $28.20 |
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$2.8B | $0.75 | 54.71% | 139.69% | $54.38 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
|
$101.68 | $101.07 | $49B | 15.74x | $0.75 | 2.99% | 1.32x |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$320.47 | $325.65 | $160.3B | 25.87x | $0.61 | 0.71% | 9.69x |
|
ASM.TO
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
|
$11.45 | $8.95 | $1.8B | 56.29x | $0.00 | 0% | 14.04x |
|
CFP.TO
Canfor Corp.
|
$13.57 | $16.17 | $1.6B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.30x |
|
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
|
$23.56 | $28.20 | $18.6B | 71.65x | $0.00 | 0% | 4.45x |
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$46.17 | $54.38 | $55.4B | 16.91x | $0.05 | 0.38% | 5.74x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
|
32.19% | 0.384 | 40.29% | 0.54x |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
1.28% | 1.955 | 0.38% | 1.17x |
|
ASM.TO
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
|
2.5% | -0.545 | 0.58% | 2.15x |
|
CFP.TO
Canfor Corp.
|
24.91% | -0.799 | 56.38% | 0.45x |
|
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
|
24.05% | 4.289 | 16.6% | 0.46x |
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
8.13% | 1.267 | 2.23% | 1.28x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
|
$2.6B | $1B | 5.94% | 9.16% | 13.84% | $3.1B |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$3B | $2.9B | 18.97% | 19.64% | 57.63% | $1.8B |
|
ASM.TO
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
|
$14M | $10M | 14.79% | 15.24% | 33.77% | -$12.3M |
|
CFP.TO
Canfor Corp.
|
-$71.5M | -$108.9M | -11.21% | -13.72% | -8.64% | -$28.9M |
|
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
|
$474.9M | $407.6M | 1.75% | 2.41% | 42.9% | $122M |
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$1.5B | $1.4B | 27.49% | 31.72% | 47.95% | $1.1B |
Nutrien Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NTR.TO or AEM.TO?
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a net margin of 10.86% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of 42.74%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.16% beat Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 19.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTR.TONutrien Ltd.35.36% $1.65 $51.2B AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.60.18% $4.24 $34.4B -
What do Analysts Say About NTR.TO or AEM.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $101.07, signalling downside risk potential of -0.6%. On the other hand Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $325.65 which suggests that it could grow by 1.62%. Given that Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTR.TONutrien Ltd.8 11 1 AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.11 5 1 -
Is NTR.TO or AEM.TO More Risky?
Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.109, which suggesting that the stock is 10.899% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.538%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTR.TO or AEM.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 46.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. pays out 18.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTR.TO or AEM.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5B. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $808.7M is lower than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s net income of $2.1B. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is 25.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.32x versus 9.69x for Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTR.TONutrien Ltd.1.32x 15.74x $7.4B $808.7M AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.9.69x 25.87x $5B $2.1B
-
Which has Higher Returns NTR.TO or ASM.TO?
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. has a net margin of 10.86% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of 35.95%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.16% beat Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTR.TONutrien Ltd.35.36% $1.65 $51.2B ASM.TOAvino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.47.55% $0.07 $259.9M -
What do Analysts Say About NTR.TO or ASM.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $101.07, signalling downside risk potential of -0.6%. On the other hand Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $8.95 which suggests that it could fall by -21.83%. Given that Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. has more downside risk than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe Nutrien Ltd. is more attractive than Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTR.TONutrien Ltd.8 11 1 ASM.TOAvino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.3 1 0 -
Is NTR.TO or ASM.TO More Risky?
Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.109, which suggesting that the stock is 10.899% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. has a beta of 2.442, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.221%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTR.TO or ASM.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 46.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nutrien Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTR.TO or ASM.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $29.5M. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $808.7M is higher than Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is 56.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.32x versus 14.04x for Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTR.TONutrien Ltd.1.32x 15.74x $7.4B $808.7M ASM.TOAvino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.14.04x 56.29x $29.5M $10.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns NTR.TO or CFP.TO?
Canfor Corp. has a net margin of 10.86% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of -14.61%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.16% beat Canfor Corp.'s return on equity of -13.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTR.TONutrien Ltd.35.36% $1.65 $51.2B CFP.TOCanfor Corp.-5.68% -$1.48 $4.2B -
What do Analysts Say About NTR.TO or CFP.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $101.07, signalling downside risk potential of -0.6%. On the other hand Canfor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $16.17 which suggests that it could grow by 19.14%. Given that Canfor Corp. has higher upside potential than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe Canfor Corp. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTR.TONutrien Ltd.8 11 1 CFP.TOCanfor Corp.2 3 0 -
Is NTR.TO or CFP.TO More Risky?
Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.109, which suggesting that the stock is 10.899% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canfor Corp. has a beta of 1.592, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.241%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTR.TO or CFP.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Canfor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 46.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Canfor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nutrien Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTR.TO or CFP.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Canfor Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $808.7M is higher than Canfor Corp.'s net income of -$184.1M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while Canfor Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.32x versus 0.30x for Canfor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTR.TONutrien Ltd.1.32x 15.74x $7.4B $808.7M CFP.TOCanfor Corp.0.30x -- $1.3B -$184.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns NTR.TO or EQX.TO?
Equinox Gold Corp. has a net margin of 10.86% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of 12.08%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.16% beat Equinox Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTR.TONutrien Ltd.35.36% $1.65 $51.2B EQX.TOEquinox Gold Corp.49.98% $0.35 $10.5B -
What do Analysts Say About NTR.TO or EQX.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $101.07, signalling downside risk potential of -0.6%. On the other hand Equinox Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $28.20 which suggests that it could grow by 19.71%. Given that Equinox Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe Equinox Gold Corp. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTR.TONutrien Ltd.8 11 1 EQX.TOEquinox Gold Corp.8 0 0 -
Is NTR.TO or EQX.TO More Risky?
Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.109, which suggesting that the stock is 10.899% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equinox Gold Corp. has a beta of 2.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.632%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTR.TO or EQX.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Equinox Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 46.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinox Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nutrien Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTR.TO or EQX.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Equinox Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $950.1M. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $808.7M is higher than Equinox Gold Corp.'s net income of $114.8M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while Equinox Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 71.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.32x versus 4.45x for Equinox Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTR.TONutrien Ltd.1.32x 15.74x $7.4B $808.7M EQX.TOEquinox Gold Corp.4.45x 71.65x $950.1M $114.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns NTR.TO or K.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a net margin of 10.86% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of 45.13%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.16% beat Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 31.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTR.TONutrien Ltd.35.36% $1.65 $51.2B K.TOKinross Gold Corp.52.43% $1.05 $13B -
What do Analysts Say About NTR.TO or K.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $101.07, signalling downside risk potential of -0.6%. On the other hand Kinross Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $54.38 which suggests that it could grow by 17.79%. Given that Kinross Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe Kinross Gold Corp. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTR.TONutrien Ltd.8 11 1 K.TOKinross Gold Corp.10 3 1 -
Is NTR.TO or K.TO More Risky?
Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.109, which suggesting that the stock is 10.899% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.264, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.428%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTR.TO or K.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Kinross Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 46.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold Corp. pays out 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTR.TO or K.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $808.7M is lower than Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while Kinross Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.32x versus 5.74x for Kinross Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTR.TONutrien Ltd.1.32x 15.74x $7.4B $808.7M K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.74x 16.91x $2.8B $1.3B
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 1.28% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 12.36% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 0.67% over the past day.
