Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
96
OGC.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$40.77
Seasonality move
:
25.98%
Day range:
$39.99 - $41.97
52-week range:
$10.86 - $42.07
Dividend yield:
0.4%
P/E ratio:
21.24x
P/S ratio:
8.61x
P/B ratio:
3.44x
Volume:
607.2K
Avg. volume:
744.3K
1-year change:
247.93%
Market cap:
$9.7B
Revenue:
$1.8B
EPS (TTM):
$1.98
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OGC.TO
OceanaGold Corp.
|
$577.6M | $1.29 | 21.77% | 119.6% | $45.70 |
|
LIRC.TO
Lithium Royalty Corp.
|
$1.3M | -$0.01 | 50.87% | -86.67% | $8.35 |
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
$160.3M | $0.15 | -15.02% | 449.25% | $24.05 |
|
RUSH.V
Carolina Rush Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.5000 |
|
TFPM.TO
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp.
|
$157.8M | $0.42 | 51.03% | 43.92% | $53.12 |
|
TRX.TO
TRX Gold Corp.
|
$29.4M | $0.03 | 195.2% | 508.7% | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OGC.TO
OceanaGold Corp.
|
$41.96 | $45.70 | $9.7B | 21.24x | $0.04 | 0.4% | 8.61x |
|
LIRC.TO
Lithium Royalty Corp.
|
$9.91 | $8.35 | $544.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 217.94x |
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
$18.28 | $24.05 | $760.4M | 77.26x | $0.10 | 2.19% | 1.13x |
|
RUSH.V
Carolina Rush Corp.
|
$0.1350 | $0.5000 | $8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TFPM.TO
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp.
|
$48.28 | $53.12 | $10B | 34.33x | $0.08 | 0.65% | 20.36x |
|
TRX.TO
TRX Gold Corp.
|
$1.28 | -- | $367.3M | 412.90x | $0.00 | 0% | 4.66x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OGC.TO
OceanaGold Corp.
|
2.67% | 2.707 | 1.1% | 0.81x |
|
LIRC.TO
Lithium Royalty Corp.
|
0.31% | -0.424 | 0.18% | 15.85x |
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
18.85% | -0.992 | 15.79% | 1.00x |
|
RUSH.V
Carolina Rush Corp.
|
-- | -2.547 | -- | 0.14x |
|
TFPM.TO
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp.
|
0.73% | 1.004 | 0.24% | 1.56x |
|
TRX.TO
TRX Gold Corp.
|
9.96% | 3.459 | 5.67% | 0.23x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OGC.TO
OceanaGold Corp.
|
$244.9M | $201.6M | 19.75% | 20.56% | 32.64% | $129.8M |
|
LIRC.TO
Lithium Royalty Corp.
|
$488.9K | -$1.6M | -2.98% | -2.98% | -284.43% | -$599.5K |
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
$43.5M | $11.5M | -1.33% | -1.59% | 6.84% | -$14.5M |
|
RUSH.V
Carolina Rush Corp.
|
-- | -$335.2K | -3766.29% | -3766.29% | -- | -$235K |
|
TFPM.TO
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp.
|
$88.1M | $77.7M | 11.29% | 11.36% | 60.35% | -$99.5M |
|
TRX.TO
TRX Gold Corp.
|
$6.1M | $3.7M | 6.44% | 6.72% | 20.93% | -$2.7M |
OceanaGold Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns OGC.TO or LIRC.TO?
Lithium Royalty Corp. has a net margin of 20.76% compared to OceanaGold Corp.'s net margin of -220.88%. OceanaGold Corp.'s return on equity of 20.56% beat Lithium Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -2.98%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital OGC.TOOceanaGold Corp.39.64% $0.52 $3B LIRC.TOLithium Royalty Corp.85.13% -$0.02 $198.5M -
What do Analysts Say About OGC.TO or LIRC.TO?
OceanaGold Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.70, signalling upside risk potential of 8.91%. On the other hand Lithium Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $8.35 which suggests that it could fall by -15.74%. Given that OceanaGold Corp. has higher upside potential than Lithium Royalty Corp., analysts believe OceanaGold Corp. is more attractive than Lithium Royalty Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings OGC.TOOceanaGold Corp.5 0 0 LIRC.TOLithium Royalty Corp.2 2 0 -
Is OGC.TO or LIRC.TO More Risky?
OceanaGold Corp. has a beta of 1.040, which suggesting that the stock is 4.027% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithium Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OGC.TO or LIRC.TO?
OceanaGold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. Lithium Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OceanaGold Corp. pays 7.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithium Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. OceanaGold Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OGC.TO or LIRC.TO?
OceanaGold Corp. quarterly revenues are $617.7M, which are larger than Lithium Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $574.3K. OceanaGold Corp.'s net income of $128.2M is higher than Lithium Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.3M. Notably, OceanaGold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while Lithium Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OceanaGold Corp. is 8.61x versus 217.94x for Lithium Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income OGC.TOOceanaGold Corp.8.61x 21.24x $617.7M $128.2M LIRC.TOLithium Royalty Corp.217.94x -- $574.3K -$1.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns OGC.TO or NEO.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a net margin of 20.76% compared to OceanaGold Corp.'s net margin of 1.11%. OceanaGold Corp.'s return on equity of 20.56% beat Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital OGC.TOOceanaGold Corp.39.64% $0.52 $3B NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.25.87% $0.04 $692.8M -
What do Analysts Say About OGC.TO or NEO.TO?
OceanaGold Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.70, signalling upside risk potential of 8.91%. On the other hand Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.05 which suggests that it could grow by 29.71%. Given that Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than OceanaGold Corp., analysts believe Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is more attractive than OceanaGold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings OGC.TOOceanaGold Corp.5 0 0 NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is OGC.TO or NEO.TO More Risky?
OceanaGold Corp. has a beta of 1.040, which suggesting that the stock is 4.027% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.969%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OGC.TO or NEO.TO?
OceanaGold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. OceanaGold Corp. pays 7.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays out 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OGC.TO or NEO.TO?
OceanaGold Corp. quarterly revenues are $617.7M, which are larger than Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues of $168.3M. OceanaGold Corp.'s net income of $128.2M is higher than Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M. Notably, OceanaGold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s PE ratio is 77.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OceanaGold Corp. is 8.61x versus 1.13x for Neo Performance Materials, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income OGC.TOOceanaGold Corp.8.61x 21.24x $617.7M $128.2M NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.13x 77.26x $168.3M $1.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns OGC.TO or RUSH.V?
Carolina Rush Corp. has a net margin of 20.76% compared to OceanaGold Corp.'s net margin of --. OceanaGold Corp.'s return on equity of 20.56% beat Carolina Rush Corp.'s return on equity of -3766.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital OGC.TOOceanaGold Corp.39.64% $0.52 $3B RUSH.VCarolina Rush Corp.-- -$0.01 -$726.9K -
What do Analysts Say About OGC.TO or RUSH.V?
OceanaGold Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.70, signalling upside risk potential of 8.91%. On the other hand Carolina Rush Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $0.5000 which suggests that it could grow by 270.37%. Given that Carolina Rush Corp. has higher upside potential than OceanaGold Corp., analysts believe Carolina Rush Corp. is more attractive than OceanaGold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings OGC.TOOceanaGold Corp.5 0 0 RUSH.VCarolina Rush Corp.0 0 0 -
Is OGC.TO or RUSH.V More Risky?
OceanaGold Corp. has a beta of 1.040, which suggesting that the stock is 4.027% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carolina Rush Corp. has a beta of -1.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 238.003%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OGC.TO or RUSH.V?
OceanaGold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. Carolina Rush Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OceanaGold Corp. pays 7.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Carolina Rush Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. OceanaGold Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OGC.TO or RUSH.V?
OceanaGold Corp. quarterly revenues are $617.7M, which are larger than Carolina Rush Corp. quarterly revenues of --. OceanaGold Corp.'s net income of $128.2M is higher than Carolina Rush Corp.'s net income of -$350.7K. Notably, OceanaGold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while Carolina Rush Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OceanaGold Corp. is 8.61x versus -- for Carolina Rush Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income OGC.TOOceanaGold Corp.8.61x 21.24x $617.7M $128.2M RUSH.VCarolina Rush Corp.-- -- -- -$350.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns OGC.TO or TFPM.TO?
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. has a net margin of 20.76% compared to OceanaGold Corp.'s net margin of 66.25%. OceanaGold Corp.'s return on equity of 20.56% beat Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 11.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital OGC.TOOceanaGold Corp.39.64% $0.52 $3B TFPM.TOTriple Flag Precious Metals Corp.68.46% $0.41 $2.8B -
What do Analysts Say About OGC.TO or TFPM.TO?
OceanaGold Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.70, signalling upside risk potential of 8.91%. On the other hand Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $53.12 which suggests that it could grow by 10.03%. Given that Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than OceanaGold Corp., analysts believe Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. is more attractive than OceanaGold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings OGC.TOOceanaGold Corp.5 0 0 TFPM.TOTriple Flag Precious Metals Corp.4 4 0 -
Is OGC.TO or TFPM.TO More Risky?
OceanaGold Corp. has a beta of 1.040, which suggesting that the stock is 4.027% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OGC.TO or TFPM.TO?
OceanaGold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. OceanaGold Corp. pays 7.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. pays out 187.49% of its earnings as a dividend. OceanaGold Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OGC.TO or TFPM.TO?
OceanaGold Corp. quarterly revenues are $617.7M, which are larger than Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of $128.7M. OceanaGold Corp.'s net income of $128.2M is higher than Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp.'s net income of $85.3M. Notably, OceanaGold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is 34.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OceanaGold Corp. is 8.61x versus 20.36x for Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income OGC.TOOceanaGold Corp.8.61x 21.24x $617.7M $128.2M TFPM.TOTriple Flag Precious Metals Corp.20.36x 34.33x $128.7M $85.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns OGC.TO or TRX.TO?
TRX Gold Corp. has a net margin of 20.76% compared to OceanaGold Corp.'s net margin of 8.86%. OceanaGold Corp.'s return on equity of 20.56% beat TRX Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 6.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital OGC.TOOceanaGold Corp.39.64% $0.52 $3B TRX.TOTRX Gold Corp.34.77% -- $103.1M -
What do Analysts Say About OGC.TO or TRX.TO?
OceanaGold Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.70, signalling upside risk potential of 8.91%. On the other hand TRX Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 156.41%. Given that TRX Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than OceanaGold Corp., analysts believe TRX Gold Corp. is more attractive than OceanaGold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings OGC.TOOceanaGold Corp.5 0 0 TRX.TOTRX Gold Corp.3 0 0 -
Is OGC.TO or TRX.TO More Risky?
OceanaGold Corp. has a beta of 1.040, which suggesting that the stock is 4.027% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TRX Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.487, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.348%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OGC.TO or TRX.TO?
OceanaGold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. TRX Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OceanaGold Corp. pays 7.7% of its earnings as a dividend. TRX Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. OceanaGold Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OGC.TO or TRX.TO?
OceanaGold Corp. quarterly revenues are $617.7M, which are larger than TRX Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $17.5M. OceanaGold Corp.'s net income of $128.2M is higher than TRX Gold Corp.'s net income of $1.6M. Notably, OceanaGold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while TRX Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 412.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OceanaGold Corp. is 8.61x versus 4.66x for TRX Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income OGC.TOOceanaGold Corp.8.61x 21.24x $617.7M $128.2M TRX.TOTRX Gold Corp.4.66x 412.90x $17.5M $1.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
70
RGC alert for Jan 8
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is down 21.5% over the past day.
Buy
64
RVMD alert for Jan 8
Revolution Medicines, Inc. [RVMD] is up 4.61% over the past day.
Sell
38
CRNX alert for Jan 8
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [CRNX] is down 0.23% over the past day.
