AGI.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Barrick Mining Corp. has a net margin of 59.77% compared to Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net margin of 45.79%. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.44% beat Barrick Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 15.3%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $64.38, signalling upside risk potential of 21.42%. On the other hand Barrick Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $65.38 which suggests that it could grow by 6.12%. Given that Alamos Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Barrick Mining Corp., analysts believe Alamos Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Barrick Mining Corp..

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Barrick Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.840, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.034%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Barrick Mining Corp. offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Alamos Gold, Inc. pays 14.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Barrick Mining Corp. pays out 33.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $636.7M, which are smaller than Barrick Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net income of $380.6M is lower than Barrick Mining Corp.'s net income of $2.6B. Notably, Alamos Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.04x while Barrick Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold, Inc. is 9.96x versus 5.21x for Barrick Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a net margin of 59.77% compared to Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net margin of 34.48%. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.44% beat Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.8%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $64.38, signalling upside risk potential of 21.42%. On the other hand Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $269.49 which suggests that it could grow by 11.61%. Given that Alamos Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd., analysts believe Alamos Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd..

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.455%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Alamos Gold, Inc. pays 14.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. pays out 42.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $636.7M, which are smaller than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net income of $380.6M is lower than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Alamos Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.04x while Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is 25.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold, Inc. is 9.96x versus 8.24x for Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GFG Resources, Inc. has a net margin of 59.77% compared to Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.44% beat GFG Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.21%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $64.38, signalling upside risk potential of 21.42%. On the other hand GFG Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 364.29%. Given that GFG Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alamos Gold, Inc., analysts believe GFG Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Alamos Gold, Inc..

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GFG Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.132, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.179%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. GFG Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold, Inc. pays 14.37% of its earnings as a dividend. GFG Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $636.7M, which are larger than GFG Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net income of $380.6M is higher than GFG Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$256.7K. Notably, Alamos Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.04x while GFG Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold, Inc. is 9.96x versus -- for GFG Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Q-Gold Resources Ltd. has a net margin of 59.77% compared to Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.44% beat Q-Gold Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $64.38, signalling upside risk potential of 21.42%. On the other hand Q-Gold Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alamos Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Q-Gold Resources Ltd., analysts believe Alamos Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Q-Gold Resources Ltd..

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Q-Gold Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.631%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Q-Gold Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold, Inc. pays 14.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Q-Gold Resources Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $636.7M, which are larger than Q-Gold Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net income of $380.6M is higher than Q-Gold Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$327.3K. Notably, Alamos Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.04x while Q-Gold Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold, Inc. is 9.96x versus -- for Q-Gold Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.