Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
61
ZFH.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$15.20
Seasonality move
:
-0.08%
Day range:
$15.20 - $15.21
52-week range:
$14.00 - $15.23
Dividend yield:
5.59%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
20K
Avg. volume:
18.3K
1-year change:
1.13%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZFH.TO
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CFRT.TO
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FSL.TO
First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IFRF.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MFT.TO
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XIG.TO
iShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZFH.TO
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF
|
$15.21 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 5.59% | -- |
|
CFRT.TO
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD
|
$20.67 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 5.26% | -- |
|
FSL.TO
First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
$16.55 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 6.8% | -- |
|
IFRF.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr
|
$7.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 6.89% | -- |
|
MFT.TO
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF
|
$15.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 8.69% | -- |
|
XIG.TO
iShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
$19.98 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 4.58% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZFH.TO
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF
|
-- | 0.144 | -- | -- |
|
CFRT.TO
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD
|
-- | -0.346 | -- | -- |
|
FSL.TO
First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -0.017 | -- | -- |
|
IFRF.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr
|
-- | -0.198 | -- | -- |
|
MFT.TO
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF
|
-- | -0.418 | -- | -- |
|
XIG.TO
iShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | 1.904 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZFH.TO
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CFRT.TO
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FSL.TO
First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IFRF.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MFT.TO
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XIG.TO
iShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ZFH.TO or CFRT.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's net margin of --. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF-- -- -- CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZFH.TO or CFRT.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has higher upside potential than CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD, analysts believe BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF is more attractive than CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF0 0 0 CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD0 0 0 -
Is ZFH.TO or CFRT.TO More Risky?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a beta of 0.621, which suggesting that the stock is 37.944% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZFH.TO or CFRT.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.59%. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD offers a yield of 5.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZFH.TO or CFRT.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD quarterly revenues of --. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's net income of --. Notably, BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF is -- versus -- for CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF-- -- -- -- CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZFH.TO or FSL.TO?
First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's net margin of --. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF-- -- -- FSL.TOFirst Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZFH.TO or FSL.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged), analysts believe BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF is more attractive than First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF0 0 0 FSL.TOFirst Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)0 0 0 -
Is ZFH.TO or FSL.TO More Risky?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a beta of 0.621, which suggesting that the stock is 37.944% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a beta of 0.344, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.587%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZFH.TO or FSL.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.59%. First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) offers a yield of 6.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZFH.TO or FSL.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) quarterly revenues of --. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net income of --. Notably, BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF-- -- -- -- FSL.TOFirst Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZFH.TO or IFRF.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's net margin of --. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's return on equity of -- beat IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF-- -- -- IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZFH.TO or IFRF.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has higher upside potential than IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr, analysts believe BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF is more attractive than IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF0 0 0 IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr0 0 0 -
Is ZFH.TO or IFRF.TO More Risky?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a beta of 0.621, which suggesting that the stock is 37.944% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a beta of 0.217, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.29%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZFH.TO or IFRF.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.59%. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr offers a yield of 6.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZFH.TO or IFRF.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr quarterly revenues of --. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's net income of -- is lower than IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's net income of --. Notably, BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF is -- versus -- for IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF-- -- -- -- IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZFH.TO or MFT.TO?
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's net margin of --. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF-- -- -- MFT.TOMackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZFH.TO or MFT.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF, analysts believe BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF is more attractive than Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF0 0 0 MFT.TOMackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is ZFH.TO or MFT.TO More Risky?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a beta of 0.621, which suggesting that the stock is 37.944% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF has a beta of 0.239, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.106%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZFH.TO or MFT.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.59%. Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF offers a yield of 8.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZFH.TO or MFT.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF-- -- -- -- MFT.TOMackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZFH.TO or XIG.TO?
iShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's net margin of --. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF-- -- -- XIG.TOiShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZFH.TO or XIG.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has higher upside potential than iShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged), analysts believe BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF is more attractive than iShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF0 0 0 XIG.TOiShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)0 0 0 -
Is ZFH.TO or XIG.TO More Risky?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a beta of 0.621, which suggesting that the stock is 37.944% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a beta of 1.926, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.573%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZFH.TO or XIG.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.59%. iShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) offers a yield of 4.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZFH.TO or XIG.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) quarterly revenues of --. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net income of --. Notably, BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF is -- versus -- for iShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF-- -- -- -- XIG.TOiShares US IG Corporate Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
