Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
23
IFRF.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.80
Seasonality move
:
-0.64%
Day range:
$7.79 - $7.79
52-week range:
$7.77 - $8.34
Dividend yield:
6.89%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
1.2K
1-year change:
-6.26%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IFRF.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CFRT.TO
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FSL.TO
First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IGCF.TO
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MFT.TO
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZFH.TO
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IFRF.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr
|
$7.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 6.89% | -- |
|
CFRT.TO
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD
|
$20.67 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 5.26% | -- |
|
FSL.TO
First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
$16.55 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 6.8% | -- |
|
IGCF.TO
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series
|
$16.55 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 4.51% | -- |
|
MFT.TO
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF
|
$15.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 8.69% | -- |
|
ZFH.TO
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF
|
$15.21 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 5.59% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IFRF.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr
|
-- | -0.198 | -- | -- |
|
CFRT.TO
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD
|
-- | -0.346 | -- | -- |
|
FSL.TO
First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -0.017 | -- | -- |
|
IGCF.TO
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series
|
-- | 1.652 | -- | -- |
|
MFT.TO
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF
|
-- | -0.418 | -- | -- |
|
ZFH.TO
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF
|
-- | 0.144 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IFRF.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CFRT.TO
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FSL.TO
First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IGCF.TO
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MFT.TO
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZFH.TO
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IFRF.TO or CFRT.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a net margin of -- compared to IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's net margin of --. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's return on equity of -- beat CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr-- -- -- CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IFRF.TO or CFRT.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has higher upside potential than CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD, analysts believe IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr is more attractive than CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr0 0 0 CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD0 0 0 -
Is IFRF.TO or CFRT.TO More Risky?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a beta of 0.217, which suggesting that the stock is 78.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IFRF.TO or CFRT.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.89%. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD offers a yield of 5.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IFRF.TO or CFRT.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD quarterly revenues of --. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's net income of -- is lower than CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's net income of --. Notably, IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr is -- versus -- for CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr-- -- -- -- CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IFRF.TO or FSL.TO?
First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a net margin of -- compared to IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's net margin of --. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr-- -- -- FSL.TOFirst Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IFRF.TO or FSL.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has higher upside potential than First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged), analysts believe IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr is more attractive than First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr0 0 0 FSL.TOFirst Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)0 0 0 -
Is IFRF.TO or FSL.TO More Risky?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a beta of 0.217, which suggesting that the stock is 78.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a beta of 0.344, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.587%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IFRF.TO or FSL.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.89%. First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) offers a yield of 6.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IFRF.TO or FSL.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) quarterly revenues of --. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net income of --. Notably, IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr is -- versus -- for First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr-- -- -- -- FSL.TOFirst Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IFRF.TO or IGCF.TO?
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series has a net margin of -- compared to IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's net margin of --. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr-- -- -- IGCF.TOPIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IFRF.TO or IGCF.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has higher upside potential than PIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series, analysts believe IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr is more attractive than PIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr0 0 0 IGCF.TOPIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series0 0 0 -
Is IFRF.TO or IGCF.TO More Risky?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a beta of 0.217, which suggesting that the stock is 78.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series has a beta of 1.486, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.603%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IFRF.TO or IGCF.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.89%. PIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series offers a yield of 4.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IFRF.TO or IGCF.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series quarterly revenues of --. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series's net income of --. Notably, IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr is -- versus -- for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr-- -- -- -- IGCF.TOPIMCO Investment Grade Credit (CAN) ETF Series-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IFRF.TO or MFT.TO?
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's net margin of --. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr-- -- -- MFT.TOMackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IFRF.TO or MFT.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF, analysts believe IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr is more attractive than Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr0 0 0 MFT.TOMackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is IFRF.TO or MFT.TO More Risky?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a beta of 0.217, which suggesting that the stock is 78.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF has a beta of 0.239, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.106%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IFRF.TO or MFT.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.89%. Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF offers a yield of 8.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IFRF.TO or MFT.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr-- -- -- -- MFT.TOMackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IFRF.TO or ZFH.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a net margin of -- compared to IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's net margin of --. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's return on equity of -- beat BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr-- -- -- ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IFRF.TO or ZFH.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has higher upside potential than BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF, analysts believe IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr is more attractive than BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr0 0 0 ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF0 0 0 -
Is IFRF.TO or ZFH.TO More Risky?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a beta of 0.217, which suggesting that the stock is 78.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a beta of 0.621, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.944%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IFRF.TO or ZFH.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.89%. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF offers a yield of 5.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IFRF.TO or ZFH.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF quarterly revenues of --. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's net income of -- is lower than BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's net income of --. Notably, IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr is -- versus -- for BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr-- -- -- -- ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
