Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
16
CFRT.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$20.75
Seasonality move
:
1.75%
Day range:
$20.69 - $20.69
52-week range:
$20.55 - $21.03
Dividend yield:
5.26%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
82
1-year change:
-1.1%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CFRT.TO
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLX.B.TO
Purpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FSL.TO
First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IFRF.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MFT.TO
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZFH.TO
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CFRT.TO
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD
|
$20.67 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 5.26% | -- |
|
FLX.B.TO
Purpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD
|
$8.62 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 7.67% | -- |
|
FSL.TO
First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
$16.55 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 6.8% | -- |
|
IFRF.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr
|
$7.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 6.89% | -- |
|
MFT.TO
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF
|
$15.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 8.69% | -- |
|
ZFH.TO
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF
|
$15.21 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 5.59% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CFRT.TO
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD
|
-- | -0.346 | -- | -- |
|
FLX.B.TO
Purpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD
|
-- | -1.207 | -- | -- |
|
FSL.TO
First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -0.017 | -- | -- |
|
IFRF.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr
|
-- | -0.198 | -- | -- |
|
MFT.TO
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF
|
-- | -0.418 | -- | -- |
|
ZFH.TO
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF
|
-- | 0.144 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CFRT.TO
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLX.B.TO
Purpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FSL.TO
First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IFRF.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MFT.TO
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZFH.TO
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CFRT.TO or FLX.B.TO?
Purpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD has a net margin of -- compared to CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's net margin of --. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD-- -- -- FLX.B.TOPurpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CFRT.TO or FLX.B.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has higher upside potential than Purpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD, analysts believe CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD is more attractive than Purpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD0 0 0 FLX.B.TOPurpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD0 0 0 -
Is CFRT.TO or FLX.B.TO More Risky?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD has a beta of 0.199, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.098%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFRT.TO or FLX.B.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Purpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD offers a yield of 7.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFRT.TO or FLX.B.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD quarterly revenues of --. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD's net income of --. Notably, CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD is -- versus -- for Purpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD-- -- -- -- FLX.B.TOPurpose Global Flexible Credit Fund ETF NCH CAD-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CFRT.TO or FSL.TO?
First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a net margin of -- compared to CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's net margin of --. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD-- -- -- FSL.TOFirst Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CFRT.TO or FSL.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has higher upside potential than First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged), analysts believe CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD is more attractive than First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD0 0 0 FSL.TOFirst Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)0 0 0 -
Is CFRT.TO or FSL.TO More Risky?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a beta of 0.344, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.587%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFRT.TO or FSL.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) offers a yield of 6.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFRT.TO or FSL.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged) quarterly revenues of --. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net income of --. Notably, CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD is -- versus -- for First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD-- -- -- -- FSL.TOFirst Trust Senior Loan ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CFRT.TO or IFRF.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a net margin of -- compared to CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's net margin of --. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's return on equity of -- beat IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD-- -- -- IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CFRT.TO or IFRF.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has higher upside potential than IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr, analysts believe CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD is more attractive than IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD0 0 0 IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr0 0 0 -
Is CFRT.TO or IFRF.TO More Risky?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr has a beta of 0.217, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.29%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFRT.TO or IFRF.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr offers a yield of 6.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFRT.TO or IFRF.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr quarterly revenues of --. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's net income of -- is lower than IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's net income of --. Notably, CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD is -- versus -- for IA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD-- -- -- -- IFRF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Floating RateFd ETF Sr-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CFRT.TO or MFT.TO?
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's net margin of --. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD-- -- -- MFT.TOMackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CFRT.TO or MFT.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF, analysts believe CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD is more attractive than Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD0 0 0 MFT.TOMackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is CFRT.TO or MFT.TO More Risky?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF has a beta of 0.239, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.106%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFRT.TO or MFT.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF offers a yield of 8.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFRT.TO or MFT.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD-- -- -- -- MFT.TOMackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CFRT.TO or ZFH.TO?
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's net margin of --. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's return on equity of -- beat BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD-- -- -- ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CFRT.TO or ZFH.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has higher upside potential than BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF, analysts believe CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD is more attractive than BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD0 0 0 ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF0 0 0 -
Is CFRT.TO or ZFH.TO More Risky?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF has a beta of 0.621, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.944%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFRT.TO or ZFH.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF offers a yield of 5.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFRT.TO or ZFH.TO?
CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's net income of -- is lower than BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD is -- versus -- for BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFRT.TOCI Floating Rate Income Fund ETF CAD-- -- -- -- ZFH.TOBMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
