Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Sell
46
XMW.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$58.35
Seasonality move
:
3.44%
Day range:
$58.18 - $58.38
52-week range:
$53.49 - $59.99
Dividend yield:
1.89%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
188
Avg. volume:
2K
1-year change:
2.73%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGDV.TO
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MWLV.TO
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TQGM.TO
TD Q Global Multifactor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WSHR.NO
Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
$58.13 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 1.89% | -- |
|
CGDV.TO
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged
|
$24.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 2.47% | -- |
|
MWLV.TO
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF
|
$25.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0.94% | -- |
|
TQGM.TO
TD Q Global Multifactor ETF
|
$23.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 1.49% | -- |
|
WSHR.NO
Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
$33.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 1.97% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
-- | 0.408 | -- | -- |
|
CGDV.TO
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged
|
-- | 0.342 | -- | -- |
|
MWLV.TO
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | 0.635 | -- | -- |
|
TQGM.TO
TD Q Global Multifactor ETF
|
-- | 0.525 | -- | -- |
|
WSHR.NO
Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | 0.400 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGDV.TO
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MWLV.TO
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TQGM.TO
TD Q Global Multifactor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WSHR.NO
Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns XMW.TO or CGDV.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XMW.TO or CGDV.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has higher upside potential than CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged, analysts believe iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF is more attractive than CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF0 0 0 CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged0 0 0 -
Is XMW.TO or CGDV.TO More Risky?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a beta of 0.394, which suggesting that the stock is 60.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XMW.TO or CGDV.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XMW.TO or CGDV.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF is -- versus -- for CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- -- CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XMW.TO or MWLV.TO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XMW.TO or MWLV.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has higher upside potential than Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF is more attractive than Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF0 0 0 MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 -
Is XMW.TO or MWLV.TO More Risky?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a beta of 0.394, which suggesting that the stock is 60.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XMW.TO or MWLV.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XMW.TO or MWLV.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF is -- versus -- for Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- -- MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XMW.TO or TQGM.TO?
TD Q Global Multifactor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat TD Q Global Multifactor ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- TQGM.TOTD Q Global Multifactor ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XMW.TO or TQGM.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TD Q Global Multifactor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has higher upside potential than TD Q Global Multifactor ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF is more attractive than TD Q Global Multifactor ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF0 0 0 TQGM.TOTD Q Global Multifactor ETF0 0 0 -
Is XMW.TO or TQGM.TO More Risky?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a beta of 0.394, which suggesting that the stock is 60.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TD Q Global Multifactor ETF has a beta of 0.530, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.984%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XMW.TO or TQGM.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. TD Q Global Multifactor ETF offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TD Q Global Multifactor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XMW.TO or TQGM.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TD Q Global Multifactor ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than TD Q Global Multifactor ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TD Q Global Multifactor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF is -- versus -- for TD Q Global Multifactor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- -- TQGM.TOTD Q Global Multifactor ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XMW.TO or WSHR.NO?
Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- WSHR.NOWealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XMW.TO or WSHR.NO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has higher upside potential than Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF is more attractive than Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF0 0 0 WSHR.NOWealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is XMW.TO or WSHR.NO More Risky?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a beta of 0.394, which suggesting that the stock is 60.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XMW.TO or WSHR.NO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XMW.TO or WSHR.NO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF is -- versus -- for Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- -- WSHR.NOWealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XMW.TO or XMY.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- XMY.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XMW.TO or XMY.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged), analysts believe iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF0 0 0 XMY.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)0 0 0 -
Is XMW.TO or XMY.TO More Risky?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a beta of 0.394, which suggesting that the stock is 60.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a beta of 0.570, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.023%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XMW.TO or XMY.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XMW.TO or XMY.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- -- XMY.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
37
OKLO alert for Dec 16
Oklo, Inc. [OKLO] is down 5.81% over the past day.
Sell
43
SEI alert for Dec 16
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. [SEI] is down 5.3% over the past day.
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 21.85% over the past day.
