Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Sell
49
CGDV.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$24.47
Seasonality move
:
-0.54%
Day range:
$24.45 - $24.47
52-week range:
$21.67 - $24.74
Dividend yield:
2.47%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
268
Avg. volume:
1.2K
1-year change:
7.99%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGDV.TO
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EDGE.TO
Evolve Innovation Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGDV.TO
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged
|
$24.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 2.47% | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
$46.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.7% | -- |
|
EDGE.TO
Evolve Innovation Index Fund
|
$43.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 0.08% | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
$39.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.75 | 1.88% | -- |
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
$58.13 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 1.89% | -- |
|
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
$33.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 1.97% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGDV.TO
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged
|
-- | 0.342 | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | 0.895 | -- | -- |
|
EDGE.TO
Evolve Innovation Index Fund
|
-- | 0.832 | -- | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
-- | 0.471 | -- | -- |
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
-- | 0.408 | -- | -- |
|
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | 0.400 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGDV.TO
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EDGE.TO
Evolve Innovation Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CGDV.TO or DISC.TO?
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net margin of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's return on equity of -- beat BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGDV.TO or DISC.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has higher upside potential than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF, analysts believe CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is more attractive than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged0 0 0 DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGDV.TO or DISC.TO More Risky?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.49%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGDV.TO or DISC.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGDV.TO or DISC.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net income of -- is lower than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is -- versus -- for BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- -- DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGDV.TO or EDGE.TO?
Evolve Innovation Index Fund has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net margin of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Evolve Innovation Index Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- EDGE.TOEvolve Innovation Index Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGDV.TO or EDGE.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolve Innovation Index Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has higher upside potential than Evolve Innovation Index Fund, analysts believe CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is more attractive than Evolve Innovation Index Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged0 0 0 EDGE.TOEvolve Innovation Index Fund0 0 0 -
Is CGDV.TO or EDGE.TO More Risky?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolve Innovation Index Fund has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.183%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGDV.TO or EDGE.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Evolve Innovation Index Fund offers a yield of 0.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolve Innovation Index Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGDV.TO or EDGE.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evolve Innovation Index Fund quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Evolve Innovation Index Fund's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evolve Innovation Index Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is -- versus -- for Evolve Innovation Index Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- -- EDGE.TOEvolve Innovation Index Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGDV.TO or VVO.TO?
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net margin of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- VVO.TOVanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGDV.TO or VVO.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has higher upside potential than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF, analysts believe CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is more attractive than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged0 0 0 VVO.TOVanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGDV.TO or VVO.TO More Risky?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.217%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGDV.TO or VVO.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGDV.TO or VVO.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is -- versus -- for Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- -- VVO.TOVanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGDV.TO or XMW.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net margin of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGDV.TO or XMW.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF, analysts believe CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is more attractive than iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged0 0 0 XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGDV.TO or XMW.TO More Risky?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a beta of 0.394, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.633%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGDV.TO or XMW.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGDV.TO or XMW.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- -- XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGDV.TO or XMY.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net margin of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- XMY.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGDV.TO or XMY.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged), analysts believe CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is more attractive than iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged0 0 0 XMY.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)0 0 0 -
Is CGDV.TO or XMY.TO More Risky?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a beta of 0.570, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.023%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGDV.TO or XMY.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGDV.TO or XMY.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net income of --. Notably, CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- -- XMY.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
37
OKLO alert for Dec 16
Oklo, Inc. [OKLO] is down 5.81% over the past day.
Sell
43
SEI alert for Dec 16
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. [SEI] is down 5.3% over the past day.
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 21.85% over the past day.
