Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
63
CGDV.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$24.70
Seasonality move
:
-0.54%
Day range:
$24.70 - $24.70
52-week range:
$21.67 - $24.74
Dividend yield:
2.03%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
306
Avg. volume:
1.4K
1-year change:
12.67%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGDV.TO
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EDGE.TO
Evolve Innovation Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGDV.TO
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged
|
$24.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 2.03% | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
$46.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.65% | -- |
|
EDGE.TO
Evolve Innovation Index Fund
|
$44.66 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 0.35% | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
$39.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.84 | 2.11% | -- |
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
$58.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.49 | 1.56% | -- |
|
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
$33.17 | -- | -- | -- | $0.37 | 1.89% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGDV.TO
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged
|
-- | 0.032 | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | 1.338 | -- | -- |
|
EDGE.TO
Evolve Innovation Index Fund
|
-- | 0.948 | -- | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
-- | 0.294 | -- | -- |
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
-- | 0.430 | -- | -- |
|
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | 0.226 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGDV.TO
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EDGE.TO
Evolve Innovation Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CGDV.TO or DISC.TO?
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net margin of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's return on equity of -- beat BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGDV.TO or DISC.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has higher upside potential than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF, analysts believe CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is more attractive than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged0 0 0 DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGDV.TO or DISC.TO More Risky?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has a beta of 1.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.437%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGDV.TO or DISC.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGDV.TO or DISC.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net income of -- is lower than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is -- versus -- for BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- -- DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGDV.TO or EDGE.TO?
Evolve Innovation Index Fund has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net margin of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Evolve Innovation Index Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- EDGE.TOEvolve Innovation Index Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGDV.TO or EDGE.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolve Innovation Index Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has higher upside potential than Evolve Innovation Index Fund, analysts believe CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is more attractive than Evolve Innovation Index Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged0 0 0 EDGE.TOEvolve Innovation Index Fund0 0 0 -
Is CGDV.TO or EDGE.TO More Risky?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolve Innovation Index Fund has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.112%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGDV.TO or EDGE.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Evolve Innovation Index Fund offers a yield of 0.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolve Innovation Index Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGDV.TO or EDGE.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evolve Innovation Index Fund quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Evolve Innovation Index Fund's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evolve Innovation Index Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is -- versus -- for Evolve Innovation Index Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- -- EDGE.TOEvolve Innovation Index Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGDV.TO or VVO.TO?
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net margin of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- VVO.TOVanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGDV.TO or VVO.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has higher upside potential than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF, analysts believe CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is more attractive than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged0 0 0 VVO.TOVanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGDV.TO or VVO.TO More Risky?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.567, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.256%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGDV.TO or VVO.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGDV.TO or VVO.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is -- versus -- for Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- -- VVO.TOVanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGDV.TO or XMW.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net margin of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGDV.TO or XMW.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF, analysts believe CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is more attractive than iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged0 0 0 XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGDV.TO or XMW.TO More Risky?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a beta of 0.394, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.614%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGDV.TO or XMW.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGDV.TO or XMW.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- -- XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGDV.TO or XMY.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net margin of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- XMY.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGDV.TO or XMY.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged), analysts believe CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is more attractive than iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged0 0 0 XMY.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)0 0 0 -
Is CGDV.TO or XMY.TO More Risky?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a beta of 0.570, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.011%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGDV.TO or XMY.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGDV.TO or XMY.TO?
CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net income of --. Notably, CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGDV.TOCI Global Minimum Downside Vlt Idx ETF C$ Hedged-- -- -- -- XMY.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
65
RGC alert for Jan 9
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is down 21.5% over the past day.
Buy
58
KRUS alert for Jan 9
Kura Sushi USA, Inc. [KRUS] is up 16.75% over the past day.
Buy
53
PBF alert for Jan 9
PBF Energy, Inc. [PBF] is up 13.85% over the past day.
