Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Buy
72
MWLV.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$25.42
Seasonality move
:
6.59%
Day range:
$25.50 - $25.57
52-week range:
$22.76 - $26.48
Dividend yield:
0.94%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
3.7K
Avg. volume:
8.6K
1-year change:
7.25%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MWLV.TO
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NSGE.TO
NBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TQGM.TO
TD Q Global Multifactor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WSHR.NO
Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MWLV.TO
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF
|
$25.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0.94% | -- |
|
NSGE.TO
NBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF
|
$42.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 0.71% | -- |
|
TQGM.TO
TD Q Global Multifactor ETF
|
$23.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 1.49% | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
$40.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.75 | 1.87% | -- |
|
WSHR.NO
Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
$58.39 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 1.88% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MWLV.TO
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | 0.635 | -- | -- |
|
NSGE.TO
NBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF
|
-- | 1.072 | -- | -- |
|
TQGM.TO
TD Q Global Multifactor ETF
|
-- | 0.525 | -- | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
-- | 0.471 | -- | -- |
|
WSHR.NO
Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
-- | 0.408 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MWLV.TO
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NSGE.TO
NBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TQGM.TO
TD Q Global Multifactor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WSHR.NO
Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MWLV.TO or NSGE.TO?
NBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of -- beat NBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- NSGE.TONBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MWLV.TO or NSGE.TO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has higher upside potential than NBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF is more attractive than NBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 NSGE.TONBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is MWLV.TO or NSGE.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.664%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MWLV.TO or NSGE.TO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. NBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MWLV.TO or NSGE.TO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's net income of -- is lower than NBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF is -- versus -- for NBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -- NSGE.TONBI Sustainable Global Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MWLV.TO or TQGM.TO?
TD Q Global Multifactor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of -- beat TD Q Global Multifactor ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- TQGM.TOTD Q Global Multifactor ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MWLV.TO or TQGM.TO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TD Q Global Multifactor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has higher upside potential than TD Q Global Multifactor ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF is more attractive than TD Q Global Multifactor ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 TQGM.TOTD Q Global Multifactor ETF0 0 0 -
Is MWLV.TO or TQGM.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TD Q Global Multifactor ETF has a beta of 0.530, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.984%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MWLV.TO or TQGM.TO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. TD Q Global Multifactor ETF offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TD Q Global Multifactor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MWLV.TO or TQGM.TO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TD Q Global Multifactor ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's net income of -- is lower than TD Q Global Multifactor ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TD Q Global Multifactor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF is -- versus -- for TD Q Global Multifactor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -- TQGM.TOTD Q Global Multifactor ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MWLV.TO or VVO.TO?
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of -- beat Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- VVO.TOVanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MWLV.TO or VVO.TO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has higher upside potential than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF is more attractive than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 VVO.TOVanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF0 0 0 -
Is MWLV.TO or VVO.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.217%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MWLV.TO or VVO.TO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MWLV.TO or VVO.TO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's net income of -- is lower than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF is -- versus -- for Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -- VVO.TOVanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MWLV.TO or WSHR.NO?
Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of -- beat Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- WSHR.NOWealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MWLV.TO or WSHR.NO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has higher upside potential than Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF is more attractive than Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 WSHR.NOWealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is MWLV.TO or WSHR.NO More Risky?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MWLV.TO or WSHR.NO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MWLV.TO or WSHR.NO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's net income of -- is lower than Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF is -- versus -- for Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -- WSHR.NOWealthsimple Shariah World Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MWLV.TO or XMW.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MWLV.TO or XMW.TO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is MWLV.TO or XMW.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a beta of 0.394, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.633%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MWLV.TO or XMW.TO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MWLV.TO or XMW.TO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -- XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 16.58% over the past day.
Sell
33
ZBIO alert for Dec 16
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 13.5% over the past day.
Sell
38
HUT alert for Dec 16
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 1.86% over the past day.
