Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
52
VVL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$63.31
Seasonality move
:
1.92%
Day range:
$62.69 - $63.15
52-week range:
$44.22 - $64.00
Dividend yield:
1.79%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
5.5K
Avg. volume:
10.5K
1-year change:
19.15%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VVL.TO
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCSW.NO
Fidelity Sustainable World ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HEQT.TO
Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MWLV.TO
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VMO.TO
Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VVL.TO
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF
|
$63.15 | -- | -- | -- | $1.13 | 1.79% | -- |
|
FCSW.NO
Fidelity Sustainable World ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
HEQT.TO
Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF
|
$21.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 1.67% | -- |
|
MWLV.TO
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF
|
$25.41 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 1.47% | -- |
|
VMO.TO
Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF
|
$80.33 | -- | -- | -- | $0.58 | 0.72% | -- |
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
$58.09 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 1.89% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VVL.TO
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF
|
-- | 1.281 | -- | -- |
|
FCSW.NO
Fidelity Sustainable World ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
HEQT.TO
Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.864 | -- | -- |
|
MWLV.TO
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | 0.635 | -- | -- |
|
VMO.TO
Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF
|
-- | 1.327 | -- | -- |
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
-- | 0.408 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VVL.TO
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCSW.NO
Fidelity Sustainable World ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HEQT.TO
Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MWLV.TO
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VMO.TO
Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns VVL.TO or FCSW.NO?
Fidelity Sustainable World ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's net margin of --. Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Sustainable World ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VVL.TOVanguard Global Value Factor ETF-- -- -- FCSW.NOFidelity Sustainable World ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About VVL.TO or FCSW.NO?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Sustainable World ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Sustainable World ETF, analysts believe Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Sustainable World ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VVL.TOVanguard Global Value Factor ETF0 0 0 FCSW.NOFidelity Sustainable World ETF0 0 0 -
Is VVL.TO or FCSW.NO More Risky?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Sustainable World ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VVL.TO or FCSW.NO?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Fidelity Sustainable World ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Sustainable World ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VVL.TO or FCSW.NO?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Sustainable World ETF quarterly revenues of --. Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Sustainable World ETF's net income of --. Notably, Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Sustainable World ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Sustainable World ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VVL.TOVanguard Global Value Factor ETF-- -- -- -- FCSW.NOFidelity Sustainable World ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns VVL.TO or HEQT.TO?
Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's net margin of --. Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VVL.TOVanguard Global Value Factor ETF-- -- -- HEQT.TOGlobal X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About VVL.TO or HEQT.TO?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has higher upside potential than Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF is more attractive than Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VVL.TOVanguard Global Value Factor ETF0 0 0 HEQT.TOGlobal X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is VVL.TO or HEQT.TO More Risky?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.318%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VVL.TO or HEQT.TO?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VVL.TO or HEQT.TO?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF is -- versus -- for Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VVL.TOVanguard Global Value Factor ETF-- -- -- -- HEQT.TOGlobal X All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns VVL.TO or MWLV.TO?
Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's net margin of --. Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VVL.TOVanguard Global Value Factor ETF-- -- -- MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About VVL.TO or MWLV.TO?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has higher upside potential than Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF, analysts believe Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF is more attractive than Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VVL.TOVanguard Global Value Factor ETF0 0 0 MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 -
Is VVL.TO or MWLV.TO More Risky?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VVL.TO or MWLV.TO?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VVL.TO or MWLV.TO?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues of --. Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's net income of --. Notably, Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF is -- versus -- for Mackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VVL.TOVanguard Global Value Factor ETF-- -- -- -- MWLV.TOMackenzie GQE World Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns VVL.TO or VMO.TO?
Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's net margin of --. Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VVL.TOVanguard Global Value Factor ETF-- -- -- VMO.TOVanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About VVL.TO or VMO.TO?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has higher upside potential than Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF, analysts believe Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF is more attractive than Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VVL.TOVanguard Global Value Factor ETF0 0 0 VMO.TOVanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF0 0 0 -
Is VVL.TO or VMO.TO More Risky?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.954%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VVL.TO or VMO.TO?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VVL.TO or VMO.TO?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF quarterly revenues of --. Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF's net income of --. Notably, Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF is -- versus -- for Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VVL.TOVanguard Global Value Factor ETF-- -- -- -- VMO.TOVanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns VVL.TO or XMW.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's net margin of --. Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VVL.TOVanguard Global Value Factor ETF-- -- -- XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About VVL.TO or XMW.TO?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF, analysts believe Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VVL.TOVanguard Global Value Factor ETF0 0 0 XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is VVL.TO or XMW.TO More Risky?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF has a beta of 0.394, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.633%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VVL.TO or XMW.TO?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VVL.TO or XMW.TO?
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VVL.TOVanguard Global Value Factor ETF-- -- -- -- XMW.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
