SII.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ThreeD Capital, Inc. has a net margin of 19.67% compared to Sprott, Inc.'s net margin of -632.46%. Sprott, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.07% beat ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.82%.

Sprott, Inc. has a consensus price target of $133.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.25%. On the other hand ThreeD Capital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott, Inc. has higher upside potential than ThreeD Capital, Inc., analysts believe Sprott, Inc. is more attractive than ThreeD Capital, Inc..

Sprott, Inc. has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.339% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ThreeD Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.015, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.466%.

Sprott, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. ThreeD Capital, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprott, Inc. pays 57.82% of its earnings as a dividend. ThreeD Capital, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sprott, Inc. quarterly revenues are $92.2M, which are larger than ThreeD Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues of $447K. Sprott, Inc.'s net income of $18.1M is higher than ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Sprott, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.84x while ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott, Inc. is 11.03x versus 1.44x for ThreeD Capital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MedBright AI Investments, Inc. has a net margin of 19.67% compared to Sprott, Inc.'s net margin of -179.59%. Sprott, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.07% beat MedBright AI Investments, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.84%.

Sprott, Inc. has a consensus price target of $133.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.25%. On the other hand MedBright AI Investments, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott, Inc. has higher upside potential than MedBright AI Investments, Inc., analysts believe Sprott, Inc. is more attractive than MedBright AI Investments, Inc..

Sprott, Inc. has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.339% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MedBright AI Investments, Inc. has a beta of 1.312, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.221%.

Sprott, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. MedBright AI Investments, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprott, Inc. pays 57.82% of its earnings as a dividend. MedBright AI Investments, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sprott, Inc. quarterly revenues are $92.2M, which are larger than MedBright AI Investments, Inc. quarterly revenues of $114K. Sprott, Inc.'s net income of $18.1M is higher than MedBright AI Investments, Inc.'s net income of $347.4K. Notably, Sprott, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.84x while MedBright AI Investments, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott, Inc. is 11.03x versus 5.78x for MedBright AI Investments, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a net margin of 19.67% compared to Sprott, Inc.'s net margin of -3.32%. Sprott, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.07% beat Quinsam Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -41.93%.

Sprott, Inc. has a consensus price target of $133.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.25%. On the other hand Quinsam Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quinsam Capital Corp., analysts believe Sprott, Inc. is more attractive than Quinsam Capital Corp..

Sprott, Inc. has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.339% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quinsam Capital Corp. has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.05%.

Sprott, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Quinsam Capital Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprott, Inc. pays 57.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Quinsam Capital Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sprott, Inc. quarterly revenues are $92.2M, which are larger than Quinsam Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of -$4M. Sprott, Inc.'s net income of $18.1M is higher than Quinsam Capital Corp.'s net income of $132.1K. Notably, Sprott, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.84x while Quinsam Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott, Inc. is 11.03x versus -- for Quinsam Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 19.67% compared to Sprott, Inc.'s net margin of -15445.34%. Sprott, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.07% beat Humanoid Global Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -548.95%.

Sprott, Inc. has a consensus price target of $133.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.25%. On the other hand Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott, Inc. has higher upside potential than Humanoid Global Holdings Corp., analysts believe Sprott, Inc. is more attractive than Humanoid Global Holdings Corp..

Sprott, Inc. has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.339% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. has a beta of 4.043, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 304.327%.

Sprott, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprott, Inc. pays 57.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sprott, Inc. quarterly revenues are $92.2M, which are larger than Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $16.1K. Sprott, Inc.'s net income of $18.1M is higher than Humanoid Global Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Sprott, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.84x while Humanoid Global Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott, Inc. is 11.03x versus 393.63x for Humanoid Global Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.