IDK.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Grand Peak Capital Corp. has a net margin of -632.46% compared to ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s net margin of 69.75%. ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.82% beat Grand Peak Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -5.54%.

ThreeD Capital, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Grand Peak Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ThreeD Capital, Inc. has higher upside potential than Grand Peak Capital Corp., analysts believe ThreeD Capital, Inc. is more attractive than Grand Peak Capital Corp..

ThreeD Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.015, which suggesting that the stock is 98.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grand Peak Capital Corp. has a beta of 6.699, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 569.873%.

ThreeD Capital, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grand Peak Capital Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ThreeD Capital, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grand Peak Capital Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ThreeD Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues are $447K, which are larger than Grand Peak Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of $31.4K. ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$2.8M is lower than Grand Peak Capital Corp.'s net income of $21.9K. Notably, ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.44x while Grand Peak Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ThreeD Capital, Inc. is 1.44x versus 84.57x for Grand Peak Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MedBright AI Investments, Inc. has a net margin of -632.46% compared to ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s net margin of -179.59%. ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.82% beat MedBright AI Investments, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.84%.

ThreeD Capital, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MedBright AI Investments, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ThreeD Capital, Inc. has higher upside potential than MedBright AI Investments, Inc., analysts believe ThreeD Capital, Inc. is more attractive than MedBright AI Investments, Inc..

ThreeD Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.015, which suggesting that the stock is 98.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MedBright AI Investments, Inc. has a beta of 1.312, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.221%.

ThreeD Capital, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MedBright AI Investments, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ThreeD Capital, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MedBright AI Investments, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ThreeD Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues are $447K, which are larger than MedBright AI Investments, Inc. quarterly revenues of $114K. ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$2.8M is lower than MedBright AI Investments, Inc.'s net income of $347.4K. Notably, ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.44x while MedBright AI Investments, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ThreeD Capital, Inc. is 1.44x versus 6.15x for MedBright AI Investments, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a net margin of -632.46% compared to ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s net margin of -3.32%. ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.82% beat Quinsam Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -41.93%.

ThreeD Capital, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quinsam Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ThreeD Capital, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quinsam Capital Corp., analysts believe ThreeD Capital, Inc. is more attractive than Quinsam Capital Corp..

ThreeD Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.015, which suggesting that the stock is 98.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quinsam Capital Corp. has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.05%.

ThreeD Capital, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quinsam Capital Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ThreeD Capital, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quinsam Capital Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ThreeD Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues are $447K, which are larger than Quinsam Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of -$4M. ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$2.8M is lower than Quinsam Capital Corp.'s net income of $132.1K. Notably, ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.44x while Quinsam Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ThreeD Capital, Inc. is 1.44x versus -- for Quinsam Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -632.46% compared to ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s net margin of -15445.34%. ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.82% beat Humanoid Global Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -548.95%.

ThreeD Capital, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ThreeD Capital, Inc. has higher upside potential than Humanoid Global Holdings Corp., analysts believe ThreeD Capital, Inc. is more attractive than Humanoid Global Holdings Corp..

ThreeD Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.015, which suggesting that the stock is 98.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. has a beta of 4.043, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 304.327%.

ThreeD Capital, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ThreeD Capital, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ThreeD Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues are $447K, which are larger than Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $16.1K. ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$2.8M is lower than Humanoid Global Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$2.5M. Notably, ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.44x while Humanoid Global Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ThreeD Capital, Inc. is 1.44x versus 561.40x for Humanoid Global Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.