QCA.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Grand Peak Capital Corp. has a net margin of -3.32% compared to Quinsam Capital Corp.'s net margin of 69.75%. Quinsam Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -41.93% beat Grand Peak Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -5.54%.

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Grand Peak Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quinsam Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than Grand Peak Capital Corp., analysts believe Quinsam Capital Corp. is more attractive than Grand Peak Capital Corp..

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 32.05% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grand Peak Capital Corp. has a beta of 6.699, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 569.873%.

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grand Peak Capital Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quinsam Capital Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grand Peak Capital Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quinsam Capital Corp. quarterly revenues are -$4M, which are smaller than Grand Peak Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of $31.4K. Quinsam Capital Corp.'s net income of $132.1K is higher than Grand Peak Capital Corp.'s net income of $21.9K. Notably, Quinsam Capital Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Grand Peak Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quinsam Capital Corp. is -- versus 84.57x for Grand Peak Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ThreeD Capital, Inc. has a net margin of -3.32% compared to Quinsam Capital Corp.'s net margin of -632.46%. Quinsam Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -41.93% beat ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.82%.

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ThreeD Capital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quinsam Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than ThreeD Capital, Inc., analysts believe Quinsam Capital Corp. is more attractive than ThreeD Capital, Inc..

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 32.05% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ThreeD Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.015, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.466%.

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ThreeD Capital, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quinsam Capital Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ThreeD Capital, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quinsam Capital Corp. quarterly revenues are -$4M, which are smaller than ThreeD Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues of $447K. Quinsam Capital Corp.'s net income of $132.1K is higher than ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Quinsam Capital Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ThreeD Capital, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quinsam Capital Corp. is -- versus 1.44x for ThreeD Capital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MedBright AI Investments, Inc. has a net margin of -3.32% compared to Quinsam Capital Corp.'s net margin of -179.59%. Quinsam Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -41.93% beat MedBright AI Investments, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.84%.

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MedBright AI Investments, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quinsam Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than MedBright AI Investments, Inc., analysts believe Quinsam Capital Corp. is more attractive than MedBright AI Investments, Inc..

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 32.05% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MedBright AI Investments, Inc. has a beta of 1.312, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.221%.

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MedBright AI Investments, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quinsam Capital Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MedBright AI Investments, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quinsam Capital Corp. quarterly revenues are -$4M, which are smaller than MedBright AI Investments, Inc. quarterly revenues of $114K. Quinsam Capital Corp.'s net income of $132.1K is lower than MedBright AI Investments, Inc.'s net income of $347.4K. Notably, Quinsam Capital Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MedBright AI Investments, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quinsam Capital Corp. is -- versus 6.15x for MedBright AI Investments, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -3.32% compared to Quinsam Capital Corp.'s net margin of -15445.34%. Quinsam Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -41.93% beat Humanoid Global Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -548.95%.

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quinsam Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than Humanoid Global Holdings Corp., analysts believe Quinsam Capital Corp. is more attractive than Humanoid Global Holdings Corp..

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 32.05% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. has a beta of 4.043, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 304.327%.

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quinsam Capital Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quinsam Capital Corp. quarterly revenues are -$4M, which are smaller than Humanoid Global Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $16.1K. Quinsam Capital Corp.'s net income of $132.1K is higher than Humanoid Global Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Quinsam Capital Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Humanoid Global Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quinsam Capital Corp. is -- versus 561.40x for Humanoid Global Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.