Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
60
NEO.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$21.38
Seasonality move
:
6.45%
Day range:
$21.20 - $22.29
52-week range:
$7.41 - $29.57
Dividend yield:
1.95%
P/E ratio:
77.26x
P/S ratio:
1.31x
P/B ratio:
1.60x
Volume:
141.7K
Avg. volume:
290.6K
1-year change:
141.86%
Market cap:
$853.8M
Revenue:
$669M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.35
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
$175.8M | $0.25 | 0.45% | 449.25% | $28.08 |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
$25M | -- | 215.93% | -100% | $23.71 |
|
MAU.TO
Montage Gold Corp.
|
-- | -$0.04 | -- | -60.44% | $15.15 |
|
MDI.TO
Major Drilling Group International, Inc.
|
$175M | -$0.08 | 21.25% | 920% | $20.70 |
|
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
|
$7.2B | $0.71 | -1.11% | 2108.37% | $104.38 |
|
OLA.TO
Orla Mining Ltd.
|
$491.8M | $0.44 | 49.13% | 232.46% | $32.74 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
$21.38 | $28.08 | $853.8M | 77.26x | $0.10 | 1.95% | 1.31x |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
$21.39 | $23.71 | $5.6B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 140.23x |
|
MAU.TO
Montage Gold Corp.
|
$16.06 | $15.15 | $5.7B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MDI.TO
Major Drilling Group International, Inc.
|
$16.69 | $20.70 | $1.4B | 97.29x | $0.00 | 0.24% | 1.63x |
|
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
|
$105.12 | $104.38 | $51.3B | 16.51x | $0.77 | 2.83% | 1.38x |
|
OLA.TO
Orla Mining Ltd.
|
$23.69 | $32.74 | $8.2B | 69.88x | $0.02 | 0.09% | 5.91x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
21.3% | 2.249 | 22.33% | 0.66x |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
31.28% | 4.624 | 5.25% | 3.68x |
|
MAU.TO
Montage Gold Corp.
|
-- | 4.001 | -- | 5.90x |
|
MDI.TO
Major Drilling Group International, Inc.
|
6.13% | 1.826 | 2.89% | 1.73x |
|
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
|
32.19% | -0.064 | 40.29% | 0.54x |
|
OLA.TO
Orla Mining Ltd.
|
35.82% | 4.154 | 8.11% | 0.81x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
$47.3M | $7.8M | -2.04% | -2.49% | 4.65% | -$46.7M |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
$1.3M | -$10.8M | -54.76% | -136.74% | -123.56% | -$23M |
|
MAU.TO
Montage Gold Corp.
|
-$331.9K | -$12.3M | -40.61% | -40.72% | -- | -$174.4M |
|
MDI.TO
Major Drilling Group International, Inc.
|
$9.5M | -$11M | 2.47% | 2.64% | -5.95% | $25.6M |
|
NTR.TO
Nutrien Ltd.
|
$2.6B | $1B | 5.94% | 9.16% | 13.84% | $3.1B |
|
OLA.TO
Orla Mining Ltd.
|
$298.8M | $274.7M | 12.17% | 19.34% | 52.05% | $171.5M |
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NEO.TO or AII.TO?
Almonty Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -12.99% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of -1172.99%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.49% beat Almonty Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -136.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.28.23% -$0.52 $679.9M AII.TOAlmonty Industries, Inc.15.06% -$0.39 $519.9M -
What do Analysts Say About NEO.TO or AII.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.08, signalling upside risk potential of 31.72%. On the other hand Almonty Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.71 which suggests that it could grow by 10.87%. Given that Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than Almonty Industries, Inc., analysts believe Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is more attractive than Almonty Industries, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.2 0 0 AII.TOAlmonty Industries, Inc.8 1 0 -
Is NEO.TO or AII.TO More Risky?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.328, which suggesting that the stock is 32.777% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Almonty Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.720, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.044%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NEO.TO or AII.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Almonty Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Almonty Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NEO.TO or AII.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $167.7M, which are larger than Almonty Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.7M. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of -$21.8M is higher than Almonty Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$102.3M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 77.26x while Almonty Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.31x versus 140.23x for Almonty Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.31x 77.26x $167.7M -$21.8M AII.TOAlmonty Industries, Inc.140.23x -- $8.7M -$102.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns NEO.TO or MAU.TO?
Montage Gold Corp. has a net margin of -12.99% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of --. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.49% beat Montage Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -40.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.28.23% -$0.52 $679.9M MAU.TOMontage Gold Corp.-- -$0.02 $159.9M -
What do Analysts Say About NEO.TO or MAU.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.08, signalling upside risk potential of 31.72%. On the other hand Montage Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $15.15 which suggests that it could fall by -5.67%. Given that Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than Montage Gold Corp., analysts believe Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is more attractive than Montage Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.2 0 0 MAU.TOMontage Gold Corp.4 0 0 -
Is NEO.TO or MAU.TO More Risky?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.328, which suggesting that the stock is 32.777% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Montage Gold Corp. has a beta of 2.128, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.827%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NEO.TO or MAU.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Montage Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Montage Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NEO.TO or MAU.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $167.7M, which are larger than Montage Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of -$21.8M is lower than Montage Gold Corp.'s net income of -$8.7M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 77.26x while Montage Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.31x versus -- for Montage Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.31x 77.26x $167.7M -$21.8M MAU.TOMontage Gold Corp.-- -- -- -$8.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns NEO.TO or MDI.TO?
Major Drilling Group International, Inc. has a net margin of -12.99% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of -5.87%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.49% beat Major Drilling Group International, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.28.23% -$0.52 $679.9M MDI.TOMajor Drilling Group International, Inc.5.15% -$0.13 $579.1M -
What do Analysts Say About NEO.TO or MDI.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.08, signalling upside risk potential of 31.72%. On the other hand Major Drilling Group International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.70 which suggests that it could grow by 24.03%. Given that Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than Major Drilling Group International, Inc., analysts believe Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is more attractive than Major Drilling Group International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.2 0 0 MDI.TOMajor Drilling Group International, Inc.4 0 0 -
Is NEO.TO or MDI.TO More Risky?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.328, which suggesting that the stock is 32.777% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Major Drilling Group International, Inc. has a beta of 1.365, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.497%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NEO.TO or MDI.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Major Drilling Group International, Inc. offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Major Drilling Group International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NEO.TO or MDI.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $167.7M, which are smaller than Major Drilling Group International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $184.6M. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of -$21.8M is lower than Major Drilling Group International, Inc.'s net income of -$10.8M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 77.26x while Major Drilling Group International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 97.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.31x versus 1.63x for Major Drilling Group International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.31x 77.26x $167.7M -$21.8M MDI.TOMajor Drilling Group International, Inc.1.63x 97.29x $184.6M -$10.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns NEO.TO or NTR.TO?
Nutrien Ltd. has a net margin of -12.99% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 10.86%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.49% beat Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.16%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.28.23% -$0.52 $679.9M NTR.TONutrien Ltd.35.36% $1.65 $51.2B -
What do Analysts Say About NEO.TO or NTR.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.08, signalling upside risk potential of 31.72%. On the other hand Nutrien Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $104.38 which suggests that it could fall by -0.71%. Given that Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.2 0 0 NTR.TONutrien Ltd.10 8 2 -
Is NEO.TO or NTR.TO More Risky?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.328, which suggesting that the stock is 32.777% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.269%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NEO.TO or NTR.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Nutrien Ltd. offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Nutrien Ltd. pays out 46.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NEO.TO or NTR.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $167.7M, which are smaller than Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of -$21.8M is lower than Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $808.7M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 77.26x while Nutrien Ltd.'s PE ratio is 16.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.31x versus 1.38x for Nutrien Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.31x 77.26x $167.7M -$21.8M NTR.TONutrien Ltd.1.38x 16.51x $7.4B $808.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns NEO.TO or OLA.TO?
Orla Mining Ltd. has a net margin of -12.99% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 20.94%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.49% beat Orla Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of 19.34%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.28.23% -$0.52 $679.9M OLA.TOOrla Mining Ltd.56.62% $0.29 $1.4B -
What do Analysts Say About NEO.TO or OLA.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.08, signalling upside risk potential of 31.72%. On the other hand Orla Mining Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $32.74 which suggests that it could grow by 36.52%. Given that Orla Mining Ltd. has higher upside potential than Neo Performance Materials, Inc., analysts believe Orla Mining Ltd. is more attractive than Neo Performance Materials, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.2 0 0 OLA.TOOrla Mining Ltd.4 1 0 -
Is NEO.TO or OLA.TO More Risky?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.328, which suggesting that the stock is 32.777% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orla Mining Ltd. has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.532%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NEO.TO or OLA.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Orla Mining Ltd. offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Orla Mining Ltd. pays out 4.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NEO.TO or OLA.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $167.7M, which are smaller than Orla Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues of $527.8M. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of -$21.8M is lower than Orla Mining Ltd.'s net income of $110.5M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 77.26x while Orla Mining Ltd.'s PE ratio is 69.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.31x versus 5.91x for Orla Mining Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.31x 77.26x $167.7M -$21.8M OLA.TOOrla Mining Ltd.5.91x 69.88x $527.8M $110.5M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 3
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 3
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 3
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
