What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Sell
42
NEO.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$16.28
Seasonality move
:
-1.51%
Day range:
$16.09 - $16.96
52-week range:
$7.18 - $23.60
Dividend yield:
2.47%
P/E ratio:
77.26x
P/S ratio:
1.00x
P/B ratio:
1.20x
Volume:
266.1K
Avg. volume:
206.6K
1-year change:
91.82%
Market cap:
$673.5M
Revenue:
$651.9M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.23
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
$153.5M | $0.20 | -15.02% | 449.25% | $24.43 |
|
AG.TO
First Majestic Silver Corp.
|
$433M | $0.11 | 117.32% | -21.4% | $23.00 |
|
GRA.TO
NanoXplore, Inc.
|
$23.7M | -$0.03 | -14.97% | -27.47% | $3.83 |
|
LIRC.TO
Lithium Royalty Corp.
|
$1.1M | -$0.02 | 44.46% | -86.67% | $8.23 |
|
MAU.TO
Montage Gold Corp.
|
-- | -$0.04 | -- | -62.71% | $9.50 |
|
USA.TO
Americas Gold & Silver Corp.
|
$47.3M | -$0.03 | 65.53% | -84.66% | $9.38 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
$16.19 | $24.43 | $673.5M | 77.26x | $0.10 | 2.47% | 1.00x |
|
AG.TO
First Majestic Silver Corp.
|
$21.92 | $23.00 | $10.7B | 129.86x | $0.01 | 0.13% | 7.06x |
|
GRA.TO
NanoXplore, Inc.
|
$2.21 | $3.83 | $377M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.18x |
|
LIRC.TO
Lithium Royalty Corp.
|
$7.14 | $8.23 | $392.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 157.03x |
|
MAU.TO
Montage Gold Corp.
|
$8.87 | $9.50 | $3.2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
USA.TO
Americas Gold & Silver Corp.
|
$7.96 | $9.38 | $2.2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 17.20x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
18.85% | -0.418 | 15.79% | 1.00x |
|
AG.TO
First Majestic Silver Corp.
|
8.36% | 2.115 | 3.69% | 2.70x |
|
GRA.TO
NanoXplore, Inc.
|
28.63% | -1.007 | 7.84% | 1.11x |
|
LIRC.TO
Lithium Royalty Corp.
|
0.31% | 0.027 | 0.18% | 15.85x |
|
MAU.TO
Montage Gold Corp.
|
0.4% | 1.688 | 0.03% | 6.28x |
|
USA.TO
Americas Gold & Silver Corp.
|
55.56% | 2.993 | 6.19% | 0.64x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
$43.5M | $11.5M | -1.33% | -1.59% | 6.84% | -$14.5M |
|
AG.TO
First Majestic Silver Corp.
|
$132.2M | $105.9M | 3.61% | 3.98% | 26.97% | $52.7M |
|
GRA.TO
NanoXplore, Inc.
|
$1.5M | -$4.6M | -8.51% | -10.64% | -19.58% | -$9.9M |
|
LIRC.TO
Lithium Royalty Corp.
|
$488.9K | -$1.6M | -2.98% | -2.98% | -284.43% | -$599.5K |
|
MAU.TO
Montage Gold Corp.
|
-$276.8K | -$9.2M | -52.02% | -52.18% | -- | -$134.7M |
|
USA.TO
Americas Gold & Silver Corp.
|
$7.1M | -$1M | -67.91% | -116.35% | -2.43% | -$30.1M |
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NEO.TO or AG.TO?
First Majestic Silver Corp. has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 15.07%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.59% beat First Majestic Silver Corp.'s return on equity of 3.98%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.25.87% $0.04 $692.8M AG.TOFirst Majestic Silver Corp.33.66% $0.08 $4.5B -
What do Analysts Say About NEO.TO or AG.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.43, signalling upside risk potential of 50.9%. On the other hand First Majestic Silver Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.93%. Given that Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than First Majestic Silver Corp., analysts believe Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is more attractive than First Majestic Silver Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1 0 0 AG.TOFirst Majestic Silver Corp.2 2 0 -
Is NEO.TO or AG.TO More Risky?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 7.038% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Majestic Silver Corp. has a beta of 1.273, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.343%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NEO.TO or AG.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. First Majestic Silver Corp. offers a yield of 0.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. First Majestic Silver Corp. pays out 5.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NEO.TO or AG.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $168.3M, which are smaller than First Majestic Silver Corp. quarterly revenues of $392.6M. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M is lower than First Majestic Silver Corp.'s net income of $59.2M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 77.26x while First Majestic Silver Corp.'s PE ratio is 129.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.00x versus 7.06x for First Majestic Silver Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.00x 77.26x $168.3M $1.9M AG.TOFirst Majestic Silver Corp.7.06x 129.86x $392.6M $59.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns NEO.TO or GRA.TO?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of -16.11%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.59% beat NanoXplore, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.25.87% $0.04 $692.8M GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.6.25% -$0.02 $134.1M -
What do Analysts Say About NEO.TO or GRA.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.43, signalling upside risk potential of 50.9%. On the other hand NanoXplore, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.83 which suggests that it could grow by 73.08%. Given that NanoXplore, Inc. has higher upside potential than Neo Performance Materials, Inc., analysts believe NanoXplore, Inc. is more attractive than Neo Performance Materials, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1 0 0 GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.2 3 0 -
Is NEO.TO or GRA.TO More Risky?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 7.038% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NanoXplore, Inc. has a beta of 0.805, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.488%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NEO.TO or GRA.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. NanoXplore, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. NanoXplore, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NEO.TO or GRA.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $168.3M, which are larger than NanoXplore, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.4M. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M is higher than NanoXplore, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 77.26x while NanoXplore, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.00x versus 3.18x for NanoXplore, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.00x 77.26x $168.3M $1.9M GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.3.18x -- $23.4M -$3.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns NEO.TO or LIRC.TO?
Lithium Royalty Corp. has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of -220.88%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.59% beat Lithium Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -2.98%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.25.87% $0.04 $692.8M LIRC.TOLithium Royalty Corp.85.13% -$0.02 $198.5M -
What do Analysts Say About NEO.TO or LIRC.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.43, signalling upside risk potential of 50.9%. On the other hand Lithium Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $8.23 which suggests that it could grow by 15.25%. Given that Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lithium Royalty Corp., analysts believe Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is more attractive than Lithium Royalty Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1 0 0 LIRC.TOLithium Royalty Corp.3 1 0 -
Is NEO.TO or LIRC.TO More Risky?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 7.038% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithium Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NEO.TO or LIRC.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Lithium Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithium Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NEO.TO or LIRC.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $168.3M, which are larger than Lithium Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $574.3K. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M is higher than Lithium Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 77.26x while Lithium Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.00x versus 157.03x for Lithium Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.00x 77.26x $168.3M $1.9M LIRC.TOLithium Royalty Corp.157.03x -- $574.3K -$1.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns NEO.TO or MAU.TO?
Montage Gold Corp. has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of --. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.59% beat Montage Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -52.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.25.87% $0.04 $692.8M MAU.TOMontage Gold Corp.-- -$0.02 $168.1M -
What do Analysts Say About NEO.TO or MAU.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.43, signalling upside risk potential of 50.9%. On the other hand Montage Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 7.1%. Given that Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than Montage Gold Corp., analysts believe Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is more attractive than Montage Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1 0 0 MAU.TOMontage Gold Corp.5 0 0 -
Is NEO.TO or MAU.TO More Risky?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 7.038% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Montage Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.690, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.006%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NEO.TO or MAU.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Montage Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Montage Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NEO.TO or MAU.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $168.3M, which are larger than Montage Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M is higher than Montage Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.3M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 77.26x while Montage Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.00x versus -- for Montage Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.00x 77.26x $168.3M $1.9M MAU.TOMontage Gold Corp.-- -- -- -$6.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns NEO.TO or USA.TO?
Americas Gold & Silver Corp. has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of -50.85%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.59% beat Americas Gold & Silver Corp.'s return on equity of -116.35%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.25.87% $0.04 $692.8M USA.TOAmericas Gold & Silver Corp.16.77% -$0.08 $157.2M -
What do Analysts Say About NEO.TO or USA.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.43, signalling upside risk potential of 50.9%. On the other hand Americas Gold & Silver Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $9.38 which suggests that it could grow by 17.78%. Given that Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than Americas Gold & Silver Corp., analysts believe Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is more attractive than Americas Gold & Silver Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1 0 0 USA.TOAmericas Gold & Silver Corp.3 0 0 -
Is NEO.TO or USA.TO More Risky?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 7.038% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Americas Gold & Silver Corp. has a beta of 1.364, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.39%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NEO.TO or USA.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Americas Gold & Silver Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Americas Gold & Silver Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NEO.TO or USA.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $168.3M, which are larger than Americas Gold & Silver Corp. quarterly revenues of $42.5M. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M is higher than Americas Gold & Silver Corp.'s net income of -$21.6M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 77.26x while Americas Gold & Silver Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.00x versus 17.20x for Americas Gold & Silver Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.00x 77.26x $168.3M $1.9M USA.TOAmericas Gold & Silver Corp.17.20x -- $42.5M -$21.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Is JetBlue The Best Airline Stock?
Following a general trend of improvement among airline stocks, shares…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
73
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
FEIM alert for Dec 15
Frequency Electronics, Inc. [FEIM] is down 4.54% over the past day.
Buy
57
MOD alert for Dec 15
Modine Manufacturing Co. [MOD] is up 2.8% over the past day.
Sell
42
OKLO alert for Dec 15
Oklo, Inc. [OKLO] is down 3.65% over the past day.
