Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Buy
66
NEO.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$20.82
Seasonality move
:
-7.73%
Day range:
$18.95 - $19.78
52-week range:
$7.18 - $23.60
Dividend yield:
2.03%
P/E ratio:
77.26x
P/S ratio:
1.22x
P/B ratio:
1.46x
Volume:
122.1K
Avg. volume:
217.5K
1-year change:
129.52%
Market cap:
$818.3M
Revenue:
$651.9M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.23
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
$82.5M | $0.09 | 0.25% | 449.25% | $13.16 |
|
AG.TO
First Majestic Silver Corp.
|
$561.3M | $0.33 | 132.9% | 2998.59% | $39.75 |
|
EDV.TO
Endeavour Mining Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRA.TO
NanoXplore, Inc.
|
$28.2M | -$0.02 | 9.1% | -18.33% | $3.91 |
|
LIRC.TO
Lithium Royalty Corp.
|
$1.5M | -$0.01 | 170.45% | -86.67% | $9.60 |
|
MDI.TO
Major Drilling Group International, Inc.
|
$189.1M | -$0.04 | 17.64% | -67.02% | $16.80 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
$19.67 | $13.16 | $818.3M | 77.26x | $0.10 | 2.03% | 1.22x |
|
AG.TO
First Majestic Silver Corp.
|
$30.06 | $39.75 | $14.7B | 177.98x | $0.01 | 0.09% | 9.69x |
|
EDV.TO
Endeavour Mining Plc
|
$78.38 | -- | $18.9B | 28.25x | $0.86 | 2.14% | 3.53x |
|
GRA.TO
NanoXplore, Inc.
|
$2.37 | $3.91 | $404.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.41x |
|
LIRC.TO
Lithium Royalty Corp.
|
$9.94 | $9.60 | $546M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 218.59x |
|
MDI.TO
Major Drilling Group International, Inc.
|
$15.46 | $16.80 | $1.3B | 79.69x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.55x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
18.85% | -1.438 | 15.79% | 1.00x |
|
AG.TO
First Majestic Silver Corp.
|
8.36% | 1.219 | 3.69% | 2.70x |
|
EDV.TO
Endeavour Mining Plc
|
20.61% | 1.293 | 7.69% | 0.28x |
|
GRA.TO
NanoXplore, Inc.
|
28.63% | -0.186 | 7.84% | 1.11x |
|
LIRC.TO
Lithium Royalty Corp.
|
0.31% | -0.048 | 0.18% | 15.85x |
|
MDI.TO
Major Drilling Group International, Inc.
|
6.19% | 0.696 | 3.63% | 1.65x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
$43.5M | $11.5M | -1.33% | -1.59% | 6.84% | -$14.5M |
|
AG.TO
First Majestic Silver Corp.
|
$132.2M | $105.9M | 3.61% | 3.98% | 26.97% | $52.7M |
|
EDV.TO
Endeavour Mining Plc
|
$577.5M | $532.6M | 15.38% | 20.7% | 42.49% | $229.6M |
|
GRA.TO
NanoXplore, Inc.
|
$1.5M | -$4.6M | -8.51% | -10.64% | -19.58% | -$9.9M |
|
LIRC.TO
Lithium Royalty Corp.
|
$488.9K | -$1.6M | -2.98% | -2.98% | -284.43% | -$599.5K |
|
MDI.TO
Major Drilling Group International, Inc.
|
$46.1M | $25.4M | 2.81% | 2.97% | 10.42% | $17.4M |
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NEO.TO or AG.TO?
First Majestic Silver Corp. has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 15.07%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.59% beat First Majestic Silver Corp.'s return on equity of 3.98%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.25.87% $0.04 $692.8M AG.TOFirst Majestic Silver Corp.33.66% $0.08 $4.5B -
What do Analysts Say About NEO.TO or AG.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.16, signalling downside risk potential of -33.11%. On the other hand First Majestic Silver Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $39.75 which suggests that it could grow by 32.24%. Given that First Majestic Silver Corp. has higher upside potential than Neo Performance Materials, Inc., analysts believe First Majestic Silver Corp. is more attractive than Neo Performance Materials, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1 0 0 AG.TOFirst Majestic Silver Corp.2 3 0 -
Is NEO.TO or AG.TO More Risky?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.9% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Majestic Silver Corp. has a beta of 1.311, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.114%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NEO.TO or AG.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. First Majestic Silver Corp. offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. First Majestic Silver Corp. pays out 5.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NEO.TO or AG.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $168.3M, which are smaller than First Majestic Silver Corp. quarterly revenues of $392.6M. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M is lower than First Majestic Silver Corp.'s net income of $59.2M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 77.26x while First Majestic Silver Corp.'s PE ratio is 177.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.22x versus 9.69x for First Majestic Silver Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.22x 77.26x $168.3M $1.9M AG.TOFirst Majestic Silver Corp.9.69x 177.98x $392.6M $59.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns NEO.TO or EDV.TO?
Endeavour Mining Plc has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 22.15%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.59% beat Endeavour Mining Plc's return on equity of 20.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.25.87% $0.04 $692.8M EDV.TOEndeavour Mining Plc46.07% $0.93 $5.9B -
What do Analysts Say About NEO.TO or EDV.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.16, signalling downside risk potential of -33.11%. On the other hand Endeavour Mining Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than Endeavour Mining Plc, analysts believe Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is more attractive than Endeavour Mining Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1 0 0 EDV.TOEndeavour Mining Plc0 0 0 -
Is NEO.TO or EDV.TO More Risky?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.9% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Endeavour Mining Plc has a beta of 0.679, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.063%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NEO.TO or EDV.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Endeavour Mining Plc offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Endeavour Mining Plc pays out 85.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NEO.TO or EDV.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $168.3M, which are smaller than Endeavour Mining Plc quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M is lower than Endeavour Mining Plc's net income of $277.7M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 77.26x while Endeavour Mining Plc's PE ratio is 28.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.22x versus 3.53x for Endeavour Mining Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.22x 77.26x $168.3M $1.9M EDV.TOEndeavour Mining Plc3.53x 28.25x $1.3B $277.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns NEO.TO or GRA.TO?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of -16.11%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.59% beat NanoXplore, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.25.87% $0.04 $692.8M GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.6.25% -$0.02 $134.1M -
What do Analysts Say About NEO.TO or GRA.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.16, signalling downside risk potential of -33.11%. On the other hand NanoXplore, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.91 which suggests that it could grow by 64.91%. Given that NanoXplore, Inc. has higher upside potential than Neo Performance Materials, Inc., analysts believe NanoXplore, Inc. is more attractive than Neo Performance Materials, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1 0 0 GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.2 3 0 -
Is NEO.TO or GRA.TO More Risky?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.9% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NanoXplore, Inc. has a beta of 0.789, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.086%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NEO.TO or GRA.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. NanoXplore, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. NanoXplore, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NEO.TO or GRA.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $168.3M, which are larger than NanoXplore, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.4M. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M is higher than NanoXplore, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 77.26x while NanoXplore, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.22x versus 3.41x for NanoXplore, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.22x 77.26x $168.3M $1.9M GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.3.41x -- $23.4M -$3.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns NEO.TO or LIRC.TO?
Lithium Royalty Corp. has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of -220.88%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.59% beat Lithium Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -2.98%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.25.87% $0.04 $692.8M LIRC.TOLithium Royalty Corp.85.13% -$0.02 $198.5M -
What do Analysts Say About NEO.TO or LIRC.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.16, signalling downside risk potential of -33.11%. On the other hand Lithium Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $9.60 which suggests that it could fall by -6.68%. Given that Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has more downside risk than Lithium Royalty Corp., analysts believe Lithium Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Neo Performance Materials, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1 0 0 LIRC.TOLithium Royalty Corp.1 2 0 -
Is NEO.TO or LIRC.TO More Risky?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.9% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithium Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NEO.TO or LIRC.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Lithium Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithium Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NEO.TO or LIRC.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $168.3M, which are larger than Lithium Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $574.3K. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M is higher than Lithium Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 77.26x while Lithium Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.22x versus 218.59x for Lithium Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.22x 77.26x $168.3M $1.9M LIRC.TOLithium Royalty Corp.218.59x -- $574.3K -$1.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns NEO.TO or MDI.TO?
Major Drilling Group International, Inc. has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 5.71%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.59% beat Major Drilling Group International, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.25.87% $0.04 $692.8M MDI.TOMajor Drilling Group International, Inc.18.88% $0.17 $594.8M -
What do Analysts Say About NEO.TO or MDI.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.16, signalling downside risk potential of -33.11%. On the other hand Major Drilling Group International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.80 which suggests that it could grow by 8.67%. Given that Major Drilling Group International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Neo Performance Materials, Inc., analysts believe Major Drilling Group International, Inc. is more attractive than Neo Performance Materials, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1 0 0 MDI.TOMajor Drilling Group International, Inc.4 0 0 -
Is NEO.TO or MDI.TO More Risky?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.9% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Major Drilling Group International, Inc. has a beta of 1.149, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.877%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NEO.TO or MDI.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Major Drilling Group International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Major Drilling Group International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NEO.TO or MDI.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $168.3M, which are smaller than Major Drilling Group International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $244.1M. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M is lower than Major Drilling Group International, Inc.'s net income of $13.9M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 77.26x while Major Drilling Group International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 79.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.22x versus 1.55x for Major Drilling Group International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.22x 77.26x $168.3M $1.9M MDI.TOMajor Drilling Group International, Inc.1.55x 79.69x $244.1M $13.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Sell
40
BILL alert for Feb 9
Bill Holdings, Inc. [BILL] is up 3.7% over the past day.
Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 9
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is down 2.16% over the past day.
Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 9
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 2.59% over the past day.
