Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
57
GRA.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.78
Seasonality move
:
27.01%
Day range:
$2.74 - $2.80
52-week range:
$2.12 - $3.34
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
4.00x
P/B ratio:
4.95x
Volume:
137.1K
Avg. volume:
218.1K
1-year change:
14.4%
Market cap:
$474.3M
Revenue:
$128.9M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.06
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRA.TO
NanoXplore, Inc.
|
$28.2M | -$0.02 | -14.97% | -27.47% | $3.83 |
|
AYA.TO
Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.
|
$91.1M | $0.22 | 597.73% | -15.35% | $24.86 |
|
MON.V
Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
$160.3M | $0.15 | -15.02% | 449.25% | $24.05 |
|
NFG.V
New Found Gold Corp.
|
$16.2M | -$0.01 | -- | -85.05% | $4.56 |
|
THX.V
Thor Explorations Ltd.
|
$139.9M | -- | 52.25% | -- | $1.8400 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRA.TO
NanoXplore, Inc.
|
$2.78 | $3.83 | $474.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.00x |
|
AYA.TO
Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.
|
$20.43 | $24.86 | $2.9B | 3,854.72x | $0.00 | 0% | 14.77x |
|
MON.V
Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.
|
$0.44 | -- | $3.7M | 0.21x | $1.80 | 0% | -- |
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
$18.54 | $24.05 | $771.2M | 77.26x | $0.10 | 2.16% | 1.15x |
|
NFG.V
New Found Gold Corp.
|
$4.28 | $4.56 | $1.5B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
THX.V
Thor Explorations Ltd.
|
$1.3300 | $1.8400 | $886.5M | 3.88x | $0.01 | 2.82% | 2.24x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRA.TO
NanoXplore, Inc.
|
28.63% | -0.409 | 7.84% | 1.11x |
|
AYA.TO
Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.
|
22.19% | 4.611 | 6.89% | 1.44x |
|
MON.V
Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.
|
-- | 1.131 | -- | 15.06x |
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
18.85% | -0.992 | 15.79% | 1.00x |
|
NFG.V
New Found Gold Corp.
|
0.07% | 6.837 | 0.01% | 3.86x |
|
THX.V
Thor Explorations Ltd.
|
1.23% | 1.149 | 0.65% | 3.16x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRA.TO
NanoXplore, Inc.
|
$1.5M | -$4.6M | -8.51% | -10.64% | -19.58% | -$9.9M |
|
AYA.TO
Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.
|
$29.3M | $20.9M | -0.5% | -0.67% | 27.92% | -$3.1M |
|
MON.V
Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.
|
-$600 | -$306.2K | 177.22% | 178.8% | -- | -$233.9K |
|
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
|
$43.5M | $11.5M | -1.33% | -1.59% | 6.84% | -$14.5M |
|
NFG.V
New Found Gold Corp.
|
-$183.2K | -$17.3M | -57.72% | -57.79% | -- | -$16.3M |
|
THX.V
Thor Explorations Ltd.
|
$62.9M | $59.3M | 64.28% | 67.69% | 61.6% | $58.3M |
NanoXplore, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GRA.TO or AYA.TO?
Aya Gold & Silver, Inc. has a net margin of -16.11% compared to NanoXplore, Inc.'s net margin of 22.86%. NanoXplore, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.64% beat Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.6.25% -$0.02 $134.1M AYA.TOAya Gold & Silver, Inc.39.22% $0.12 $709.5M -
What do Analysts Say About GRA.TO or AYA.TO?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.83, signalling upside risk potential of 37.59%. On the other hand Aya Gold & Silver, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.86 which suggests that it could grow by 21.68%. Given that NanoXplore, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aya Gold & Silver, Inc., analysts believe NanoXplore, Inc. is more attractive than Aya Gold & Silver, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.2 3 0 AYA.TOAya Gold & Silver, Inc.5 0 0 -
Is GRA.TO or AYA.TO More Risky?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a beta of 0.802, which suggesting that the stock is 19.822% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aya Gold & Silver, Inc. has a beta of 1.184, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.449%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRA.TO or AYA.TO?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aya Gold & Silver, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NanoXplore, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aya Gold & Silver, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRA.TO or AYA.TO?
NanoXplore, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.4M, which are smaller than Aya Gold & Silver, Inc. quarterly revenues of $74.8M. NanoXplore, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M is lower than Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.'s net income of $17.1M. Notably, NanoXplore, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3,854.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NanoXplore, Inc. is 4.00x versus 14.77x for Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.4.00x -- $23.4M -$3.8M AYA.TOAya Gold & Silver, Inc.14.77x 3,854.72x $74.8M $17.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns GRA.TO or MON.V?
Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has a net margin of -16.11% compared to NanoXplore, Inc.'s net margin of --. NanoXplore, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.64% beat Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.'s return on equity of 178.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.6.25% -$0.02 $134.1M MON.VMontero Mining & Exploration Ltd.-- -$0.03 $3.5M -
What do Analysts Say About GRA.TO or MON.V?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.83, signalling upside risk potential of 37.59%. On the other hand Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 661.91%. Given that Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has higher upside potential than NanoXplore, Inc., analysts believe Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. is more attractive than NanoXplore, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.2 3 0 MON.VMontero Mining & Exploration Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GRA.TO or MON.V More Risky?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a beta of 0.802, which suggesting that the stock is 19.822% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has a beta of 1.107, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.74%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRA.TO or MON.V?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share. NanoXplore, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRA.TO or MON.V?
NanoXplore, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.4M, which are larger than Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. NanoXplore, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M is lower than Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.'s net income of -$260.6K. Notably, NanoXplore, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NanoXplore, Inc. is 4.00x versus -- for Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.4.00x -- $23.4M -$3.8M MON.VMontero Mining & Exploration Ltd.-- 0.21x -- -$260.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns GRA.TO or NEO.TO?
Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a net margin of -16.11% compared to NanoXplore, Inc.'s net margin of 1.11%. NanoXplore, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.64% beat Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.6.25% -$0.02 $134.1M NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.25.87% $0.04 $692.8M -
What do Analysts Say About GRA.TO or NEO.TO?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.83, signalling upside risk potential of 37.59%. On the other hand Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.05 which suggests that it could grow by 29.71%. Given that NanoXplore, Inc. has higher upside potential than Neo Performance Materials, Inc., analysts believe NanoXplore, Inc. is more attractive than Neo Performance Materials, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.2 3 0 NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is GRA.TO or NEO.TO More Risky?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a beta of 0.802, which suggesting that the stock is 19.822% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.969%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRA.TO or NEO.TO?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. NanoXplore, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays out 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRA.TO or NEO.TO?
NanoXplore, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.4M, which are smaller than Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues of $168.3M. NanoXplore, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M is lower than Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M. Notably, NanoXplore, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s PE ratio is 77.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NanoXplore, Inc. is 4.00x versus 1.15x for Neo Performance Materials, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.4.00x -- $23.4M -$3.8M NEO.TONeo Performance Materials, Inc.1.15x 77.26x $168.3M $1.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns GRA.TO or NFG.V?
New Found Gold Corp. has a net margin of -16.11% compared to NanoXplore, Inc.'s net margin of --. NanoXplore, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.64% beat New Found Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -57.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.6.25% -$0.02 $134.1M NFG.VNew Found Gold Corp.-- -$0.06 $101.4M -
What do Analysts Say About GRA.TO or NFG.V?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.83, signalling upside risk potential of 37.59%. On the other hand New Found Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.56 which suggests that it could grow by 6.6%. Given that NanoXplore, Inc. has higher upside potential than New Found Gold Corp., analysts believe NanoXplore, Inc. is more attractive than New Found Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.2 3 0 NFG.VNew Found Gold Corp.2 0 0 -
Is GRA.TO or NFG.V More Risky?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a beta of 0.802, which suggesting that the stock is 19.822% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Found Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.888, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.812%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRA.TO or NFG.V?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New Found Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NanoXplore, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New Found Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRA.TO or NFG.V?
NanoXplore, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.4M, which are larger than New Found Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. NanoXplore, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M is higher than New Found Gold Corp.'s net income of -$12.9M. Notably, NanoXplore, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New Found Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NanoXplore, Inc. is 4.00x versus -- for New Found Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.4.00x -- $23.4M -$3.8M NFG.VNew Found Gold Corp.-- -- -- -$12.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns GRA.TO or THX.V?
Thor Explorations Ltd. has a net margin of -16.11% compared to NanoXplore, Inc.'s net margin of 61.68%. NanoXplore, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.64% beat Thor Explorations Ltd.'s return on equity of 67.69%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.6.25% -$0.02 $134.1M THX.VThor Explorations Ltd.65.31% $0.09 $444.6M -
What do Analysts Say About GRA.TO or THX.V?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.83, signalling upside risk potential of 37.59%. On the other hand Thor Explorations Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $1.8400 which suggests that it could grow by 38.35%. Given that Thor Explorations Ltd. has higher upside potential than NanoXplore, Inc., analysts believe Thor Explorations Ltd. is more attractive than NanoXplore, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.2 3 0 THX.VThor Explorations Ltd.2 0 0 -
Is GRA.TO or THX.V More Risky?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a beta of 0.802, which suggesting that the stock is 19.822% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thor Explorations Ltd. has a beta of 1.650, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.017%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRA.TO or THX.V?
NanoXplore, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Thor Explorations Ltd. offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. NanoXplore, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Explorations Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRA.TO or THX.V?
NanoXplore, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.4M, which are smaller than Thor Explorations Ltd. quarterly revenues of $96.2M. NanoXplore, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M is lower than Thor Explorations Ltd.'s net income of $59.4M. Notably, NanoXplore, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Thor Explorations Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NanoXplore, Inc. is 4.00x versus 2.24x for Thor Explorations Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRA.TONanoXplore, Inc.4.00x -- $23.4M -$3.8M THX.VThor Explorations Ltd.2.24x 3.88x $96.2M $59.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
5
SMX alert for Jan 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 3.71% over the past day.
Buy
70
RGC alert for Jan 8
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 5.94% over the past day.
Buy
64
RVMD alert for Jan 8
Revolution Medicines, Inc. [RVMD] is down 6.23% over the past day.
