Financhill
Sell
26

GRA.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$2.43
Seasonality move :
1.79%
Day range:
$2.33 - $2.42
52-week range:
$2.12 - $3.34
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
3.41x
P/B ratio:
4.22x
Volume:
35.8K
Avg. volume:
147.4K
1-year change:
-4.05%
Market cap:
$404.3M
Revenue:
$128.9M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.06

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GRA.TO
NanoXplore, Inc.
$28.2M -$0.02 9.1% -18.33% $3.91
AYA.TO
Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.
$101.7M $0.13 686.37% 214.94% $17.33
MON.V
Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
$82.5M $0.09 0.25% 449.25% $13.16
NFG.V
New Found Gold Corp.
$16.2M -$0.01 -- -85.05% $4.99
THX.V
Thor Explorations Ltd.
$139.9M -- 52.25% -- $1.9750
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GRA.TO
NanoXplore, Inc.
$2.37 $3.91 $404.3M -- $0.00 0% 3.41x
AYA.TO
Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.
$22.72 $17.33 $3.2B 4,207.41x $0.00 0% 16.43x
MON.V
Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.
$0.77 -- $6.4M 0.37x $1.80 0% --
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
$19.67 $13.16 $818.3M 77.26x $0.10 2.03% 1.22x
NFG.V
New Found Gold Corp.
$3.81 $4.99 $1.3B -- $0.00 0% --
THX.V
Thor Explorations Ltd.
$1.5200 $1.9750 $1B 4.43x $0.03 3.29% 2.56x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GRA.TO
NanoXplore, Inc.
28.63% -0.186 7.84% 1.11x
AYA.TO
Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.
22.19% 4.276 6.89% 1.44x
MON.V
Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.
-- -0.832 -- 15.06x
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
18.85% -1.438 15.79% 1.00x
NFG.V
New Found Gold Corp.
0.07% 7.815 0.01% 3.86x
THX.V
Thor Explorations Ltd.
1.23% 1.026 0.65% 3.16x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GRA.TO
NanoXplore, Inc.
$1.5M -$4.6M -8.51% -10.64% -19.58% -$9.9M
AYA.TO
Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.
$29.3M $20.9M -0.5% -0.67% 27.92% -$3.1M
MON.V
Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.
-$600 -$306.2K 177.22% 178.8% -- -$233.9K
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
$43.5M $11.5M -1.33% -1.59% 6.84% -$14.5M
NFG.V
New Found Gold Corp.
-$183.2K -$17.3M -57.72% -57.79% -- -$16.3M
THX.V
Thor Explorations Ltd.
$62.9M $59.3M 64.28% 67.69% 61.6% $58.3M

NanoXplore, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GRA.TO or AYA.TO?

    Aya Gold & Silver, Inc. has a net margin of -16.11% compared to NanoXplore, Inc.'s net margin of 22.86%. NanoXplore, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.64% beat Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.67%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GRA.TO
    NanoXplore, Inc.
    6.25% -$0.02 $134.1M
    AYA.TO
    Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.
    39.22% $0.12 $709.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About GRA.TO or AYA.TO?

    NanoXplore, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.91, signalling upside risk potential of 64.91%. On the other hand Aya Gold & Silver, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.33 which suggests that it could fall by -24.46%. Given that NanoXplore, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aya Gold & Silver, Inc., analysts believe NanoXplore, Inc. is more attractive than Aya Gold & Silver, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GRA.TO
    NanoXplore, Inc.
    2 3 0
    AYA.TO
    Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.
    5 0 0
  • Is GRA.TO or AYA.TO More Risky?

    NanoXplore, Inc. has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aya Gold & Silver, Inc. has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.502%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRA.TO or AYA.TO?

    NanoXplore, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aya Gold & Silver, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NanoXplore, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aya Gold & Silver, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GRA.TO or AYA.TO?

    NanoXplore, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.4M, which are smaller than Aya Gold & Silver, Inc. quarterly revenues of $74.8M. NanoXplore, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M is lower than Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.'s net income of $17.1M. Notably, NanoXplore, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4,207.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NanoXplore, Inc. is 3.41x versus 16.43x for Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GRA.TO
    NanoXplore, Inc.
    3.41x -- $23.4M -$3.8M
    AYA.TO
    Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.
    16.43x 4,207.41x $74.8M $17.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns GRA.TO or MON.V?

    Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has a net margin of -16.11% compared to NanoXplore, Inc.'s net margin of --. NanoXplore, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.64% beat Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.'s return on equity of 178.8%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GRA.TO
    NanoXplore, Inc.
    6.25% -$0.02 $134.1M
    MON.V
    Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.
    -- -$0.03 $3.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About GRA.TO or MON.V?

    NanoXplore, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.91, signalling upside risk potential of 64.91%. On the other hand Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 661.91%. Given that Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has higher upside potential than NanoXplore, Inc., analysts believe Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. is more attractive than NanoXplore, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GRA.TO
    NanoXplore, Inc.
    2 3 0
    MON.V
    Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is GRA.TO or MON.V More Risky?

    NanoXplore, Inc. has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has a beta of 1.050, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.04%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRA.TO or MON.V?

    NanoXplore, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share. NanoXplore, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GRA.TO or MON.V?

    NanoXplore, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.4M, which are larger than Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. NanoXplore, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M is lower than Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.'s net income of -$260.6K. Notably, NanoXplore, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NanoXplore, Inc. is 3.41x versus -- for Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GRA.TO
    NanoXplore, Inc.
    3.41x -- $23.4M -$3.8M
    MON.V
    Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.
    -- 0.37x -- -$260.6K
  • Which has Higher Returns GRA.TO or NEO.TO?

    Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a net margin of -16.11% compared to NanoXplore, Inc.'s net margin of 1.11%. NanoXplore, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.64% beat Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.59%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GRA.TO
    NanoXplore, Inc.
    6.25% -$0.02 $134.1M
    NEO.TO
    Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
    25.87% $0.04 $692.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About GRA.TO or NEO.TO?

    NanoXplore, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.91, signalling upside risk potential of 64.91%. On the other hand Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.16 which suggests that it could fall by -33.11%. Given that NanoXplore, Inc. has higher upside potential than Neo Performance Materials, Inc., analysts believe NanoXplore, Inc. is more attractive than Neo Performance Materials, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GRA.TO
    NanoXplore, Inc.
    2 3 0
    NEO.TO
    Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
    1 0 0
  • Is GRA.TO or NEO.TO More Risky?

    NanoXplore, Inc. has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.049, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.9%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRA.TO or NEO.TO?

    NanoXplore, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. NanoXplore, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays out 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GRA.TO or NEO.TO?

    NanoXplore, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.4M, which are smaller than Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues of $168.3M. NanoXplore, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M is lower than Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M. Notably, NanoXplore, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s PE ratio is 77.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NanoXplore, Inc. is 3.41x versus 1.22x for Neo Performance Materials, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GRA.TO
    NanoXplore, Inc.
    3.41x -- $23.4M -$3.8M
    NEO.TO
    Neo Performance Materials, Inc.
    1.22x 77.26x $168.3M $1.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns GRA.TO or NFG.V?

    New Found Gold Corp. has a net margin of -16.11% compared to NanoXplore, Inc.'s net margin of --. NanoXplore, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.64% beat New Found Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -57.79%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GRA.TO
    NanoXplore, Inc.
    6.25% -$0.02 $134.1M
    NFG.V
    New Found Gold Corp.
    -- -$0.06 $101.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About GRA.TO or NFG.V?

    NanoXplore, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.91, signalling upside risk potential of 64.91%. On the other hand New Found Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.99 which suggests that it could grow by 30.91%. Given that NanoXplore, Inc. has higher upside potential than New Found Gold Corp., analysts believe NanoXplore, Inc. is more attractive than New Found Gold Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GRA.TO
    NanoXplore, Inc.
    2 3 0
    NFG.V
    New Found Gold Corp.
    2 0 0
  • Is GRA.TO or NFG.V More Risky?

    NanoXplore, Inc. has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Found Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.871, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.081%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRA.TO or NFG.V?

    NanoXplore, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New Found Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NanoXplore, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New Found Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GRA.TO or NFG.V?

    NanoXplore, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.4M, which are larger than New Found Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. NanoXplore, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M is higher than New Found Gold Corp.'s net income of -$12.9M. Notably, NanoXplore, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New Found Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NanoXplore, Inc. is 3.41x versus -- for New Found Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GRA.TO
    NanoXplore, Inc.
    3.41x -- $23.4M -$3.8M
    NFG.V
    New Found Gold Corp.
    -- -- -- -$12.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns GRA.TO or THX.V?

    Thor Explorations Ltd. has a net margin of -16.11% compared to NanoXplore, Inc.'s net margin of 61.68%. NanoXplore, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.64% beat Thor Explorations Ltd.'s return on equity of 67.69%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GRA.TO
    NanoXplore, Inc.
    6.25% -$0.02 $134.1M
    THX.V
    Thor Explorations Ltd.
    65.31% $0.09 $444.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About GRA.TO or THX.V?

    NanoXplore, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.91, signalling upside risk potential of 64.91%. On the other hand Thor Explorations Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $1.9750 which suggests that it could grow by 29.93%. Given that NanoXplore, Inc. has higher upside potential than Thor Explorations Ltd., analysts believe NanoXplore, Inc. is more attractive than Thor Explorations Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GRA.TO
    NanoXplore, Inc.
    2 3 0
    THX.V
    Thor Explorations Ltd.
    2 0 0
  • Is GRA.TO or THX.V More Risky?

    NanoXplore, Inc. has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thor Explorations Ltd. has a beta of 1.627, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.736%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRA.TO or THX.V?

    NanoXplore, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Thor Explorations Ltd. offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. NanoXplore, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Explorations Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GRA.TO or THX.V?

    NanoXplore, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.4M, which are smaller than Thor Explorations Ltd. quarterly revenues of $96.2M. NanoXplore, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M is lower than Thor Explorations Ltd.'s net income of $59.4M. Notably, NanoXplore, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Thor Explorations Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NanoXplore, Inc. is 3.41x versus 2.56x for Thor Explorations Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GRA.TO
    NanoXplore, Inc.
    3.41x -- $23.4M -$3.8M
    THX.V
    Thor Explorations Ltd.
    2.56x 4.43x $96.2M $59.4M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?

Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…

Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?

Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…

Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…

Stock Ideas

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x

Alerts

Sell
40
BILL alert for Feb 9

Bill Holdings, Inc. [BILL] is up 3.7% over the past day.

Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 9

Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is down 2.16% over the past day.

Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 9

Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 2.59% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock