GRA.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has a net margin of -13.91% compared to NanoXplore, Inc.'s net margin of --. NanoXplore, Inc.'s return on equity of -11.31% beat Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.'s return on equity of 178.8%.

NanoXplore, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.23, signalling upside risk potential of 67.53%. On the other hand Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 661.91%. Given that Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has higher upside potential than NanoXplore, Inc., analysts believe Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. is more attractive than NanoXplore, Inc..

NanoXplore, Inc. has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.441% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has a beta of 1.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.462%.

NanoXplore, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share. NanoXplore, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NanoXplore, Inc. quarterly revenues are $27.6M, which are larger than Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. NanoXplore, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M is lower than Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.'s net income of -$260.6K. Notably, NanoXplore, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NanoXplore, Inc. is 2.94x versus -- for Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a net margin of -13.91% compared to NanoXplore, Inc.'s net margin of 1.11%. NanoXplore, Inc.'s return on equity of -11.31% beat Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.59%.

NanoXplore, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.23, signalling upside risk potential of 67.53%. On the other hand Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $25.82 which suggests that it could fall by -4.96%. Given that NanoXplore, Inc. has higher upside potential than Neo Performance Materials, Inc., analysts believe NanoXplore, Inc. is more attractive than Neo Performance Materials, Inc..

NanoXplore, Inc. has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.441% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.089%.

NanoXplore, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. NanoXplore, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays out 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NanoXplore, Inc. quarterly revenues are $27.6M, which are smaller than Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues of $168.3M. NanoXplore, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M is lower than Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M. Notably, NanoXplore, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s PE ratio is 77.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NanoXplore, Inc. is 2.94x versus 1.68x for Neo Performance Materials, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Thor Explorations Ltd. has a net margin of -13.91% compared to NanoXplore, Inc.'s net margin of 61.68%. NanoXplore, Inc.'s return on equity of -11.31% beat Thor Explorations Ltd.'s return on equity of 67.69%.

NanoXplore, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.23, signalling upside risk potential of 67.53%. On the other hand Thor Explorations Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $1.9750 which suggests that it could grow by 27.42%. Given that NanoXplore, Inc. has higher upside potential than Thor Explorations Ltd., analysts believe NanoXplore, Inc. is more attractive than Thor Explorations Ltd..

NanoXplore, Inc. has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.441% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thor Explorations Ltd. has a beta of 1.616, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.612%.

NanoXplore, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Thor Explorations Ltd. offers a yield of 3.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. NanoXplore, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Explorations Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NanoXplore, Inc. quarterly revenues are $27.6M, which are smaller than Thor Explorations Ltd. quarterly revenues of $96.2M. NanoXplore, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M is lower than Thor Explorations Ltd.'s net income of $59.4M. Notably, NanoXplore, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Thor Explorations Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NanoXplore, Inc. is 2.94x versus 2.61x for Thor Explorations Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -13.91% compared to NanoXplore, Inc.'s net margin of -64.46%. NanoXplore, Inc.'s return on equity of -11.31% beat West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.95%.

NanoXplore, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.23, signalling upside risk potential of 67.53%. On the other hand West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $110.54 which suggests that it could grow by 23.72%. Given that NanoXplore, Inc. has higher upside potential than West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd., analysts believe NanoXplore, Inc. is more attractive than West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd..

NanoXplore, Inc. has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.441% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.976%.

NanoXplore, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. NanoXplore, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. pays out 2020% of its earnings as a dividend.

NanoXplore, Inc. quarterly revenues are $27.6M, which are smaller than West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. NanoXplore, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M is higher than West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.'s net income of -$1B. Notably, NanoXplore, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 56.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NanoXplore, Inc. is 2.94x versus 0.92x for West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.