MDI.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Major Drilling Group International's net margin of 25.53%. Major Drilling Group International's return on equity of 8.31% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International's return on equity of -167.71%.

Major Drilling Group International has a consensus price target of $13.75, signalling upside risk potential of 67.48%. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Major Drilling Group International has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, analysts believe Major Drilling Group International is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International.

Major Drilling Group International has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 57.013% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Major Drilling Group International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Major Drilling Group International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Major Drilling Group International quarterly revenues are $189.3M, which are larger than Bee Vectoring Technologies International quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Major Drilling Group International's net income of $18.2M is higher than Bee Vectoring Technologies International's net income of $20.9K. Notably, Major Drilling Group International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.42x while Bee Vectoring Technologies International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Major Drilling Group International is 0.99x versus 1.37x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Replenish Nutrients Holding has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Major Drilling Group International's net margin of 83.06%. Major Drilling Group International's return on equity of 8.31% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding's return on equity of -1.35%.

Major Drilling Group International has a consensus price target of $13.75, signalling upside risk potential of 67.48%. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1025%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding has higher upside potential than Major Drilling Group International, analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding is more attractive than Major Drilling Group International.

Major Drilling Group International has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 57.013% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding has a beta of 1.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.857%.

Major Drilling Group International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Major Drilling Group International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Major Drilling Group International quarterly revenues are $189.3M, which are larger than Replenish Nutrients Holding quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Major Drilling Group International's net income of $18.2M is higher than Replenish Nutrients Holding's net income of $1.8M. Notably, Major Drilling Group International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.42x while Replenish Nutrients Holding's PE ratio is 67.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Major Drilling Group International is 0.99x versus 0.72x for Replenish Nutrients Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrograph Clean Power has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Major Drilling Group International's net margin of -68703.5%. Major Drilling Group International's return on equity of 8.31% beat Hydrograph Clean Power's return on equity of -90.14%.

Major Drilling Group International has a consensus price target of $13.75, signalling upside risk potential of 67.48%. On the other hand Hydrograph Clean Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 244.44%. Given that Hydrograph Clean Power has higher upside potential than Major Drilling Group International, analysts believe Hydrograph Clean Power is more attractive than Major Drilling Group International.

Major Drilling Group International has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 57.013% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrograph Clean Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Major Drilling Group International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hydrograph Clean Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Major Drilling Group International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrograph Clean Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Major Drilling Group International quarterly revenues are $189.3M, which are larger than Hydrograph Clean Power quarterly revenues of $2.6K. Major Drilling Group International's net income of $18.2M is higher than Hydrograph Clean Power's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Major Drilling Group International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.42x while Hydrograph Clean Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Major Drilling Group International is 0.99x versus 5,378.87x for Hydrograph Clean Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Organic Potash has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Major Drilling Group International's net margin of --. Major Drilling Group International's return on equity of 8.31% beat Organic Potash's return on equity of --.

Major Drilling Group International has a consensus price target of $13.75, signalling upside risk potential of 67.48%. On the other hand Organic Potash has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Major Drilling Group International has higher upside potential than Organic Potash, analysts believe Major Drilling Group International is more attractive than Organic Potash.

Major Drilling Group International has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 57.013% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organic Potash has a beta of 0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.116%.

Major Drilling Group International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Organic Potash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Major Drilling Group International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Organic Potash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Major Drilling Group International quarterly revenues are $189.3M, which are larger than Organic Potash quarterly revenues of --. Major Drilling Group International's net income of $18.2M is higher than Organic Potash's net income of -$23.7K. Notably, Major Drilling Group International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.42x while Organic Potash's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Major Drilling Group International is 0.99x versus -- for Organic Potash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.