Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Sell
15
MUB.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$18.26
Seasonality move
:
0.02%
Day range:
$18.18 - $18.28
52-week range:
$17.83 - $18.61
Dividend yield:
4.74%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
42.8K
Avg. volume:
33.4K
1-year change:
-1.56%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUB.TO
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BND.TO
Purpose Global Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FBGO.TO
Franklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILGB.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TGFI.TO
TD Active Global Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUB.TO
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF
|
$18.25 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 4.74% | -- |
|
BND.TO
Purpose Global Bond ETF
|
$18.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 5.66% | -- |
|
FBGO.TO
Franklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr
|
$17.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 4.91% | -- |
|
ILGB.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF
|
$8.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 5.33% | -- |
|
TGFI.TO
TD Active Global Income ETF
|
$20.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 5.36% | -- |
|
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
$17.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 4.12% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUB.TO
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.849 | -- | -- |
|
BND.TO
Purpose Global Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.541 | -- | -- |
|
FBGO.TO
Franklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr
|
-- | 0.589 | -- | -- |
|
ILGB.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF
|
-- | 1.098 | -- | -- |
|
TGFI.TO
TD Active Global Income ETF
|
-- | 0.753 | -- | -- |
|
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | 0.659 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUB.TO
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BND.TO
Purpose Global Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FBGO.TO
Franklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILGB.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TGFI.TO
TD Active Global Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MUB.TO or BND.TO?
Purpose Global Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Global Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF-- -- -- BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUB.TO or BND.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Global Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Purpose Global Bond ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF is more attractive than Purpose Global Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF0 0 0 BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is MUB.TO or BND.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.578% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Global Bond ETF has a beta of 0.883, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.687%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUB.TO or BND.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.74%. Purpose Global Bond ETF offers a yield of 5.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Global Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUB.TO or BND.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Global Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Global Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Global Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Purpose Global Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF-- -- -- -- BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUB.TO or FBGO.TO?
Franklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF-- -- -- FBGO.TOFranklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUB.TO or FBGO.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr, analysts believe Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF is more attractive than Franklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF0 0 0 FBGO.TOFranklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr0 0 0 -
Is MUB.TO or FBGO.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.578% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUB.TO or FBGO.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.74%. Franklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr offers a yield of 4.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUB.TO or FBGO.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF-- -- -- -- FBGO.TOFranklin Brandywine GlobalOptmsr Fd ETF Sr-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUB.TO or ILGB.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF-- -- -- ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUB.TO or ILGB.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has higher upside potential than IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF is more attractive than IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF0 0 0 ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is MUB.TO or ILGB.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.578% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUB.TO or ILGB.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.74%. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF offers a yield of 5.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUB.TO or ILGB.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF is -- versus -- for IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF-- -- -- -- ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUB.TO or TGFI.TO?
TD Active Global Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat TD Active Global Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF-- -- -- TGFI.TOTD Active Global Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUB.TO or TGFI.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TD Active Global Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has higher upside potential than TD Active Global Income ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF is more attractive than TD Active Global Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF0 0 0 TGFI.TOTD Active Global Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is MUB.TO or TGFI.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.578% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TD Active Global Income ETF has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.484%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUB.TO or TGFI.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.74%. TD Active Global Income ETF offers a yield of 5.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TD Active Global Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUB.TO or TGFI.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TD Active Global Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than TD Active Global Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TD Active Global Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF is -- versus -- for TD Active Global Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF-- -- -- -- TGFI.TOTD Active Global Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUB.TO or XSI.TO?
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF-- -- -- XSI.TOiShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUB.TO or XSI.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF is more attractive than iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF0 0 0 XSI.TOiShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is MUB.TO or XSI.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.578% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.592%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUB.TO or XSI.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.74%. iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUB.TO or XSI.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF-- -- -- -- XSI.TOiShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
73
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
FEIM alert for Dec 16
Frequency Electronics, Inc. [FEIM] is down 3.51% over the past day.
Buy
57
MOD alert for Dec 15
Modine Manufacturing Co. [MOD] is up 1.79% over the past day.
Sell
42
OKLO alert for Dec 15
Oklo, Inc. [OKLO] is down 5.81% over the past day.
