Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Sell
50
BND.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$18.08
Seasonality move
:
-0.06%
Day range:
$18.03 - $18.08
52-week range:
$17.14 - $18.30
Dividend yield:
5.66%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
19.4K
Avg. volume:
30.6K
1-year change:
0.89%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BND.TO
Purpose Global Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EARN.TO
Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IGB.TO
Purpose Global Bond Class ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUB.TO
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PBD.TO
Purpose Total Return Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BND.TO
Purpose Global Bond ETF
|
$18.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 5.66% | -- |
|
EARN.TO
Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF
|
$49.33 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 3.04% | -- |
|
IGB.TO
Purpose Global Bond Class ETF
|
$18.39 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 5.24% | -- |
|
MUB.TO
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF
|
$18.26 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 4.74% | -- |
|
PBD.TO
Purpose Total Return Bond ETF
|
$16.57 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 4.27% | -- |
|
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
$17.02 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 4.12% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BND.TO
Purpose Global Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.541 | -- | -- |
|
EARN.TO
Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | 0.115 | -- | -- |
|
IGB.TO
Purpose Global Bond Class ETF
|
-- | 0.414 | -- | -- |
|
MUB.TO
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.849 | -- | -- |
|
PBD.TO
Purpose Total Return Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.570 | -- | -- |
|
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | 0.659 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BND.TO
Purpose Global Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EARN.TO
Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IGB.TO
Purpose Global Bond Class ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUB.TO
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PBD.TO
Purpose Total Return Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Purpose Global Bond ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BND.TO or EARN.TO?
Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Global Bond ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Global Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF-- -- -- EARN.TOEvolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BND.TO or EARN.TO?
Purpose Global Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Global Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF, analysts believe Purpose Global Bond ETF is more attractive than Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF0 0 0 EARN.TOEvolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is BND.TO or EARN.TO More Risky?
Purpose Global Bond ETF has a beta of 0.883, which suggesting that the stock is 11.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 0.483, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.706%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BND.TO or EARN.TO?
Purpose Global Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.66%. Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Purpose Global Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BND.TO or EARN.TO?
Purpose Global Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Global Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Global Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Global Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF-- -- -- -- EARN.TOEvolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BND.TO or IGB.TO?
Purpose Global Bond Class ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Global Bond ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Global Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Global Bond Class ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF-- -- -- IGB.TOPurpose Global Bond Class ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BND.TO or IGB.TO?
Purpose Global Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Global Bond Class ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Global Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Purpose Global Bond Class ETF, analysts believe Purpose Global Bond ETF is more attractive than Purpose Global Bond Class ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF0 0 0 IGB.TOPurpose Global Bond Class ETF0 0 0 -
Is BND.TO or IGB.TO More Risky?
Purpose Global Bond ETF has a beta of 0.883, which suggesting that the stock is 11.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Global Bond Class ETF has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.522%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BND.TO or IGB.TO?
Purpose Global Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.66%. Purpose Global Bond Class ETF offers a yield of 5.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Purpose Global Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Global Bond Class ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BND.TO or IGB.TO?
Purpose Global Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Global Bond Class ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Global Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Global Bond Class ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Global Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Global Bond Class ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Global Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Purpose Global Bond Class ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF-- -- -- -- IGB.TOPurpose Global Bond Class ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BND.TO or MUB.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Global Bond ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Global Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF-- -- -- MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BND.TO or MUB.TO?
Purpose Global Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Global Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF, analysts believe Purpose Global Bond ETF is more attractive than Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF0 0 0 MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is BND.TO or MUB.TO More Risky?
Purpose Global Bond ETF has a beta of 0.883, which suggesting that the stock is 11.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a beta of 0.834, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.578%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BND.TO or MUB.TO?
Purpose Global Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.66%. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF offers a yield of 4.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Purpose Global Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BND.TO or MUB.TO?
Purpose Global Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Global Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Global Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Global Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF-- -- -- -- MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BND.TO or PBD.TO?
Purpose Total Return Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Global Bond ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Global Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Total Return Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF-- -- -- PBD.TOPurpose Total Return Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BND.TO or PBD.TO?
Purpose Global Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Total Return Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Global Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Purpose Total Return Bond ETF, analysts believe Purpose Global Bond ETF is more attractive than Purpose Total Return Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF0 0 0 PBD.TOPurpose Total Return Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is BND.TO or PBD.TO More Risky?
Purpose Global Bond ETF has a beta of 0.883, which suggesting that the stock is 11.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Total Return Bond ETF has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.133%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BND.TO or PBD.TO?
Purpose Global Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.66%. Purpose Total Return Bond ETF offers a yield of 4.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Purpose Global Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Total Return Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BND.TO or PBD.TO?
Purpose Global Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Total Return Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Global Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Total Return Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Global Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Total Return Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Global Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Purpose Total Return Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF-- -- -- -- PBD.TOPurpose Total Return Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BND.TO or XSI.TO?
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Global Bond ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Global Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF-- -- -- XSI.TOiShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BND.TO or XSI.TO?
Purpose Global Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Global Bond ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF, analysts believe Purpose Global Bond ETF is more attractive than iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF0 0 0 XSI.TOiShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is BND.TO or XSI.TO More Risky?
Purpose Global Bond ETF has a beta of 0.883, which suggesting that the stock is 11.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.592%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BND.TO or XSI.TO?
Purpose Global Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.66%. iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Purpose Global Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BND.TO or XSI.TO?
Purpose Global Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Global Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Global Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Global Bond ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BND.TOPurpose Global Bond ETF-- -- -- -- XSI.TOiShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 18.39% over the past day.
Sell
33
ZBIO alert for Dec 16
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 8.28% over the past day.
Sell
38
HUT alert for Dec 16
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is down 0.76% over the past day.
