Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Sell
41
ILGB.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.96
Seasonality move
:
0.49%
Day range:
$8.96 - $8.96
52-week range:
$8.53 - $9.06
Dividend yield:
5.32%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
100
Avg. volume:
102
1-year change:
-0.11%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ILGB.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CFLX.TO
CIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EARN.TO
Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUB.TO
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PBD.TO
Purpose Total Return Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ILGB.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF
|
$8.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 5.32% | -- |
|
CFLX.TO
CIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
$16.87 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 6.14% | -- |
|
EARN.TO
Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF
|
$49.33 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 3.04% | -- |
|
MUB.TO
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF
|
$18.26 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 4.74% | -- |
|
PBD.TO
Purpose Total Return Bond ETF
|
$16.57 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 4.27% | -- |
|
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
$17.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 4.12% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ILGB.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF
|
-- | 1.098 | -- | -- |
|
CFLX.TO
CIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | 0.154 | -- | -- |
|
EARN.TO
Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | 0.115 | -- | -- |
|
MUB.TO
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.849 | -- | -- |
|
PBD.TO
Purpose Total Return Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.570 | -- | -- |
|
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | 0.659 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ILGB.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CFLX.TO
CIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EARN.TO
Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUB.TO
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PBD.TO
Purpose Total Return Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ILGB.TO or CFLX.TO?
CIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a net margin of -- compared to IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's net margin of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat CIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF-- -- -- CFLX.TOCIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ILGB.TO or CFLX.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has higher upside potential than CIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged), analysts believe IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF is more attractive than CIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF0 0 0 CFLX.TOCIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged)0 0 0 -
Is ILGB.TO or CFLX.TO More Risky?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.269%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ILGB.TO or CFLX.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.32%. CIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged) offers a yield of 6.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ILGB.TO or CFLX.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged) quarterly revenues of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than CIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net income of --. Notably, IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF is -- versus -- for CIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF-- -- -- -- CFLX.TOCIBC Flexible Yield ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ILGB.TO or EARN.TO?
Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's net margin of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF-- -- -- EARN.TOEvolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ILGB.TO or EARN.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF, analysts believe IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF is more attractive than Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF0 0 0 EARN.TOEvolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is ILGB.TO or EARN.TO More Risky?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 0.483, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.706%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ILGB.TO or EARN.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.32%. Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ILGB.TO or EARN.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Evolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF-- -- -- -- EARN.TOEvolve Active Global Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ILGB.TO or MUB.TO?
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's net margin of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF-- -- -- MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ILGB.TO or MUB.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF, analysts believe IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF is more attractive than Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF0 0 0 MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is ILGB.TO or MUB.TO More Risky?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF has a beta of 0.834, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.578%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ILGB.TO or MUB.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.32%. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF offers a yield of 4.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ILGB.TO or MUB.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF-- -- -- -- MUB.TOMackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ILGB.TO or PBD.TO?
Purpose Total Return Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's net margin of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Total Return Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF-- -- -- PBD.TOPurpose Total Return Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ILGB.TO or PBD.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Total Return Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Purpose Total Return Bond ETF, analysts believe IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF is more attractive than Purpose Total Return Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF0 0 0 PBD.TOPurpose Total Return Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is ILGB.TO or PBD.TO More Risky?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Total Return Bond ETF has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.133%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ILGB.TO or PBD.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.32%. Purpose Total Return Bond ETF offers a yield of 4.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Total Return Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ILGB.TO or PBD.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Total Return Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Total Return Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Total Return Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Purpose Total Return Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF-- -- -- -- PBD.TOPurpose Total Return Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ILGB.TO or XSI.TO?
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's net margin of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF-- -- -- XSI.TOiShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ILGB.TO or XSI.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF, analysts believe IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF is more attractive than iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF0 0 0 XSI.TOiShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is ILGB.TO or XSI.TO More Risky?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.592%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ILGB.TO or XSI.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.32%. iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ILGB.TO or XSI.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF-- -- -- -- XSI.TOiShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
37
OKLO alert for Dec 16
Oklo, Inc. [OKLO] is down 5.81% over the past day.
Sell
43
SEI alert for Dec 16
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. [SEI] is down 5.3% over the past day.
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 21.85% over the past day.
