IPCO.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

G2 Energy has a net margin of 11.33% compared to International Petroleum's net margin of -124.28%. International Petroleum's return on equity of 12.78% beat G2 Energy's return on equity of -1441.51%.

International Petroleum has a consensus price target of $19.87, signalling upside risk potential of 12.84%. On the other hand G2 Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that International Petroleum has higher upside potential than G2 Energy, analysts believe International Petroleum is more attractive than G2 Energy.

International Petroleum has a beta of 2.207, which suggesting that the stock is 120.659% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison G2 Energy has a beta of -1.263, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 226.299%.

International Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. G2 Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Petroleum pays 0.02% of its earnings as a dividend. G2 Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Petroleum quarterly revenues are $275.6M, which are larger than G2 Energy quarterly revenues of $518.3K. International Petroleum's net income of $31.2M is higher than G2 Energy's net income of -$644.1K. Notably, International Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while G2 Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Petroleum is 1.82x versus 0.27x for G2 Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

James Bay Resources has a net margin of 11.33% compared to International Petroleum's net margin of --. International Petroleum's return on equity of 12.78% beat James Bay Resources's return on equity of --.

International Petroleum has a consensus price target of $19.87, signalling upside risk potential of 12.84%. On the other hand James Bay Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that International Petroleum has higher upside potential than James Bay Resources, analysts believe International Petroleum is more attractive than James Bay Resources.

International Petroleum has a beta of 2.207, which suggesting that the stock is 120.659% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison James Bay Resources has a beta of 0.424, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.56%.

International Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. James Bay Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Petroleum pays 0.02% of its earnings as a dividend. James Bay Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Petroleum quarterly revenues are $275.6M, which are larger than James Bay Resources quarterly revenues of --. International Petroleum's net income of $31.2M is higher than James Bay Resources's net income of -$274.8K. Notably, International Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while James Bay Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Petroleum is 1.82x versus -- for James Bay Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shoal Point Energy has a net margin of 11.33% compared to International Petroleum's net margin of -2885.16%. International Petroleum's return on equity of 12.78% beat Shoal Point Energy's return on equity of --.

International Petroleum has a consensus price target of $19.87, signalling upside risk potential of 12.84%. On the other hand Shoal Point Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that International Petroleum has higher upside potential than Shoal Point Energy, analysts believe International Petroleum is more attractive than Shoal Point Energy.

International Petroleum has a beta of 2.207, which suggesting that the stock is 120.659% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shoal Point Energy has a beta of 2.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.24%.

International Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shoal Point Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Petroleum pays 0.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Shoal Point Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Petroleum quarterly revenues are $275.6M, which are larger than Shoal Point Energy quarterly revenues of $3.3K. International Petroleum's net income of $31.2M is higher than Shoal Point Energy's net income of -$96K. Notably, International Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while Shoal Point Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Petroleum is 1.82x versus 68.21x for Shoal Point Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Squatex Energy and Resources has a net margin of 11.33% compared to International Petroleum's net margin of --. International Petroleum's return on equity of 12.78% beat Squatex Energy and Resources's return on equity of --.

International Petroleum has a consensus price target of $19.87, signalling upside risk potential of 12.84%. On the other hand Squatex Energy and Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that International Petroleum has higher upside potential than Squatex Energy and Resources, analysts believe International Petroleum is more attractive than Squatex Energy and Resources.

International Petroleum has a beta of 2.207, which suggesting that the stock is 120.659% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Squatex Energy and Resources has a beta of -4.564, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 556.365%.

International Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Squatex Energy and Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Petroleum pays 0.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Squatex Energy and Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Petroleum quarterly revenues are $275.6M, which are larger than Squatex Energy and Resources quarterly revenues of --. International Petroleum's net income of $31.2M is higher than Squatex Energy and Resources's net income of -$90.2K. Notably, International Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while Squatex Energy and Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Petroleum is 1.82x versus -- for Squatex Energy and Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.