Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Buy
75
IGAF.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$16.60
Seasonality move
:
5.87%
Day range:
$16.60 - $16.60
52-week range:
$13.87 - $16.67
Dividend yield:
0.89%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
253
Avg. volume:
1K
1-year change:
5.02%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IGAF.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGRO.TO
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IGAF.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr
|
$16.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 0.89% | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
$27.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 1.8% | -- |
|
CGRO.TO
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
$28.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 1.7% | -- |
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
$28.49 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 2.07% | -- |
|
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF
|
$33.29 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 1.84% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IGAF.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr
|
-- | 0.751 | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | 0.625 | -- | -- |
|
CGRO.TO
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.696 | -- | -- |
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.683 | -- | -- |
|
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.704 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IGAF.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGRO.TO
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IGAF.TO or CBGR.TO?
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has a net margin of -- compared to IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr's net margin of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr's return on equity of -- beat CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IGAF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr-- -- -- CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IGAF.TO or CBGR.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr has higher upside potential than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF, analysts believe IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr is more attractive than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IGAF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr0 0 0 CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF0 0 0 -
Is IGAF.TO or CBGR.TO More Risky?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr has a beta of 0.684, which suggesting that the stock is 31.637% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IGAF.TO or CBGR.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IGAF.TO or CBGR.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF quarterly revenues of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr's net income of -- is lower than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's net income of --. Notably, IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr is -- versus -- for CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IGAF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr-- -- -- -- CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IGAF.TO or CGRO.TO?
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr's net margin of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr's return on equity of -- beat CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IGAF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr-- -- -- CGRO.TOCI Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IGAF.TO or CGRO.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr has higher upside potential than CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr is more attractive than CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IGAF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr0 0 0 CGRO.TOCI Growth Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is IGAF.TO or CGRO.TO More Risky?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr has a beta of 0.684, which suggesting that the stock is 31.637% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IGAF.TO or CGRO.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IGAF.TO or CGRO.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr's net income of -- is lower than CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr is -- versus -- for CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IGAF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr-- -- -- -- CGRO.TOCI Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IGAF.TO or HGRW.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr's net margin of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr's return on equity of -- beat Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IGAF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr-- -- -- HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IGAF.TO or HGRW.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr has higher upside potential than Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr is more attractive than Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IGAF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr0 0 0 HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is IGAF.TO or HGRW.TO More Risky?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr has a beta of 0.684, which suggesting that the stock is 31.637% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IGAF.TO or HGRW.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IGAF.TO or HGRW.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr's net income of -- is lower than Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr is -- versus -- for Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IGAF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr-- -- -- -- HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IGAF.TO or MGRW.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr's net margin of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IGAF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr-- -- -- MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IGAF.TO or MGRW.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF, analysts believe IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr is more attractive than Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IGAF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr0 0 0 MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is IGAF.TO or MGRW.TO More Risky?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr has a beta of 0.684, which suggesting that the stock is 31.637% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.688, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.156%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IGAF.TO or MGRW.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IGAF.TO or MGRW.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IGAF.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Allocation Fund ETF Sr-- -- -- -- MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
