Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
38
HGRW.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.96
Seasonality move
:
1.45%
Day range:
$28.66 - $28.98
52-week range:
$22.69 - $29.81
Dividend yield:
2.07%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
6.8K
Avg. volume:
519
1-year change:
12.95%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGRO.TO
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
$28.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 2.07% | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
$27.80 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 1.46% | -- |
|
CGRO.TO
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
$29.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 1.39% | -- |
|
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
$17.65 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 2.38% | -- |
|
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF
|
$34.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 1.8% | -- |
|
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
|
$27.14 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 1.95% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.617 | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | 0.584 | -- | -- |
|
CGRO.TO
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.645 | -- | -- |
|
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.504 | -- | -- |
|
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.660 | -- | -- |
|
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.701 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGRO.TO
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HGRW.TO or CBGR.TO?
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HGRW.TO or CBGR.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF, analysts believe Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF0 0 0 -
Is HGRW.TO or CBGR.TO More Risky?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HGRW.TO or CBGR.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HGRW.TO or CBGR.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HGRW.TO or CGRO.TO?
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- CGRO.TOCI Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HGRW.TO or CGRO.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 CGRO.TOCI Growth Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is HGRW.TO or CGRO.TO More Risky?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HGRW.TO or CGRO.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HGRW.TO or CGRO.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- CGRO.TOCI Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HGRW.TO or HBAL.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HGRW.TO or HBAL.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is HGRW.TO or HBAL.TO More Risky?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.704, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.614%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HGRW.TO or HBAL.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HGRW.TO or HBAL.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HGRW.TO or MGRW.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HGRW.TO or MGRW.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF, analysts believe Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is HGRW.TO or MGRW.TO More Risky?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.676, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.372%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HGRW.TO or MGRW.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HGRW.TO or MGRW.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HGRW.TO or TGRO.TO?
TD Growth ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat TD Growth ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- TGRO.TOTD Growth ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HGRW.TO or TGRO.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TD Growth ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than TD Growth ETF Portfolio, analysts believe Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than TD Growth ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 TGRO.TOTD Growth ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is HGRW.TO or TGRO.TO More Risky?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TD Growth ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.417%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HGRW.TO or TGRO.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. TD Growth ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TD Growth ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HGRW.TO or TGRO.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TD Growth ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than TD Growth ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TD Growth ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for TD Growth ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- TGRO.TOTD Growth ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 47.98% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is down 31.47% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 28.97% over the past day.
