Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
44
HBAL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$17.65
Seasonality move
:
3.96%
Day range:
$17.48 - $17.70
52-week range:
$14.59 - $18.08
Dividend yield:
2.38%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
9.4K
Avg. volume:
9.5K
1-year change:
9.36%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSBG.NO
CIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PAGF.TO
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
$17.65 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 2.38% | -- |
|
CSBG.NO
CIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
$28.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 2.07% | -- |
|
PAGF.TO
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF
|
$28.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 3.63% | -- |
|
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
|
$27.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 1.92% | -- |
|
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF
|
$18.22 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 1.63% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.504 | -- | -- |
|
CSBG.NO
CIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.617 | -- | -- |
|
PAGF.TO
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | 0.487 | -- | -- |
|
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.701 | -- | -- |
|
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.666 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSBG.NO
CIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PAGF.TO
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HBAL.TO or CSBG.NO?
CIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat CIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- CSBG.NOCIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HBAL.TO or CSBG.NO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than CIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF, analysts believe Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than CIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 CSBG.NOCIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF0 0 0 -
Is HBAL.TO or CSBG.NO More Risky?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.704, which suggesting that the stock is 29.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HBAL.TO or CSBG.NO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. CIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HBAL.TO or CSBG.NO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than CIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for CIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- CSBG.NOCIBC Sustainable Balanced Gr Solu ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HBAL.TO or HGRW.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HBAL.TO or HGRW.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is HBAL.TO or HGRW.TO More Risky?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.704, which suggesting that the stock is 29.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HBAL.TO or HGRW.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HBAL.TO or HGRW.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HBAL.TO or PAGF.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HBAL.TO or PAGF.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF, analysts believe Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF0 0 0 -
Is HBAL.TO or PAGF.TO More Risky?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.704, which suggesting that the stock is 29.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HBAL.TO or PAGF.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HBAL.TO or PAGF.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HBAL.TO or TGRO.TO?
TD Growth ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat TD Growth ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- TGRO.TOTD Growth ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HBAL.TO or TGRO.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TD Growth ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than TD Growth ETF Portfolio, analysts believe Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than TD Growth ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 TGRO.TOTD Growth ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is HBAL.TO or TGRO.TO More Risky?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.704, which suggesting that the stock is 29.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TD Growth ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.417%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HBAL.TO or TGRO.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. TD Growth ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TD Growth ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HBAL.TO or TGRO.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TD Growth ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than TD Growth ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TD Growth ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for TD Growth ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- TGRO.TOTD Growth ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HBAL.TO or ZGRO.TO?
BMO Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- ZGRO.TOBMO Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HBAL.TO or ZGRO.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Growth ETF, analysts believe Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than BMO Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 ZGRO.TOBMO Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is HBAL.TO or ZGRO.TO More Risky?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.704, which suggesting that the stock is 29.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Growth ETF has a beta of 0.688, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.216%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HBAL.TO or ZGRO.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. BMO Growth ETF offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HBAL.TO or ZGRO.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- ZGRO.TOBMO Growth ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is down 31.47% over the past day.
Sell
30
HROW alert for Mar 4
Harrow, Inc. [HROW] is down 27.92% over the past day.
Sell
28
GDXD alert for Mar 4
MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN [GDXD] is up 26.18% over the past day.
