Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Buy
64
HBAL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$17.39
Seasonality move
:
3.96%
Day range:
$17.38 - $17.46
52-week range:
$14.59 - $17.62
Dividend yield:
2.39%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
3.3K
Avg. volume:
6.4K
1-year change:
8.82%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRCC.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PAGF.TO
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
$17.39 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 2.39% | -- |
|
GRCC.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF
|
$22.55 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 8.76% | -- |
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
$28.49 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 2.07% | -- |
|
PAGF.TO
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF
|
$28.01 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 3.55% | -- |
|
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio
|
$34.98 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 1.85% | -- |
|
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF
|
$17.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 1.68% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.520 | -- | -- |
|
GRCC.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF
|
-- | 0.540 | -- | -- |
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.683 | -- | -- |
|
PAGF.TO
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | 0.606 | -- | -- |
|
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.734 | -- | -- |
|
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.718 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRCC.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PAGF.TO
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HBAL.TO or GRCC.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- GRCC.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HBAL.TO or GRCC.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF, analysts believe Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 GRCC.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF0 0 0 -
Is HBAL.TO or GRCC.TO More Risky?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.713, which suggesting that the stock is 28.691% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HBAL.TO or GRCC.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF offers a yield of 8.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HBAL.TO or GRCC.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- GRCC.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HBAL.TO or HGRW.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HBAL.TO or HGRW.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is HBAL.TO or HGRW.TO More Risky?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.713, which suggesting that the stock is 28.691% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HBAL.TO or HGRW.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HBAL.TO or HGRW.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HBAL.TO or PAGF.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HBAL.TO or PAGF.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF, analysts believe Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF0 0 0 -
Is HBAL.TO or PAGF.TO More Risky?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.713, which suggesting that the stock is 28.691% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HBAL.TO or PAGF.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HBAL.TO or PAGF.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HBAL.TO or XGRO.TO?
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- XGRO.TOiShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HBAL.TO or XGRO.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio, analysts believe Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 XGRO.TOiShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is HBAL.TO or XGRO.TO More Risky?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.713, which suggesting that the stock is 28.691% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.744%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HBAL.TO or XGRO.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HBAL.TO or XGRO.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- XGRO.TOiShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HBAL.TO or ZGRO.TO?
BMO Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- ZGRO.TOBMO Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HBAL.TO or ZGRO.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Growth ETF, analysts believe Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than BMO Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 ZGRO.TOBMO Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is HBAL.TO or ZGRO.TO More Risky?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.713, which suggesting that the stock is 28.691% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Growth ETF has a beta of 0.694, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.572%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HBAL.TO or ZGRO.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. BMO Growth ETF offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HBAL.TO or ZGRO.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- ZGRO.TOBMO Growth ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
