Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Buy
59
PAGF.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.04
Seasonality move
:
-1.75%
Day range:
$28.02 - $28.12
52-week range:
$22.43 - $28.25
Dividend yield:
3.55%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
7.1K
Avg. volume:
11.3K
1-year change:
11.46%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PAGF.TO
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGRO.TO
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PAGF.TO
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF
|
$28.01 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 3.55% | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
$27.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 1.8% | -- |
|
CGRO.TO
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
$28.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 1.7% | -- |
|
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
$17.39 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 2.39% | -- |
|
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio
|
$34.98 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 1.85% | -- |
|
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF
|
$17.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 1.68% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PAGF.TO
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | 0.606 | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | 0.625 | -- | -- |
|
CGRO.TO
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.696 | -- | -- |
|
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.520 | -- | -- |
|
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.734 | -- | -- |
|
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.718 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PAGF.TO
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGRO.TO
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PAGF.TO or CBGR.TO?
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PAGF.TO or CBGR.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has higher upside potential than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF, analysts believe Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF is more attractive than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF0 0 0 CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF0 0 0 -
Is PAGF.TO or CBGR.TO More Risky?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAGF.TO or CBGR.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PAGF.TO or CBGR.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF is -- versus -- for CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- -- CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PAGF.TO or CGRO.TO?
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- CGRO.TOCI Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PAGF.TO or CGRO.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has higher upside potential than CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF is more attractive than CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF0 0 0 CGRO.TOCI Growth Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is PAGF.TO or CGRO.TO More Risky?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAGF.TO or CGRO.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PAGF.TO or CGRO.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF is -- versus -- for CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- -- CGRO.TOCI Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PAGF.TO or HBAL.TO?
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PAGF.TO or HBAL.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF is more attractive than Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF0 0 0 HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is PAGF.TO or HBAL.TO More Risky?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.691%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAGF.TO or HBAL.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PAGF.TO or HBAL.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- -- HBAL.TOGlobal X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PAGF.TO or XGRO.TO?
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- XGRO.TOiShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PAGF.TO or XGRO.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio, analysts believe Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF is more attractive than iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF0 0 0 XGRO.TOiShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is PAGF.TO or XGRO.TO More Risky?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.744%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAGF.TO or XGRO.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PAGF.TO or XGRO.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- -- XGRO.TOiShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PAGF.TO or ZGRO.TO?
BMO Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- ZGRO.TOBMO Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PAGF.TO or ZGRO.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Growth ETF, analysts believe Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF is more attractive than BMO Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF0 0 0 ZGRO.TOBMO Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is PAGF.TO or ZGRO.TO More Risky?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Growth ETF has a beta of 0.694, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.572%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAGF.TO or ZGRO.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. BMO Growth ETF offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PAGF.TO or ZGRO.TO?
Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Active Growth Fund ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PAGF.TOPurpose Active Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- -- ZGRO.TOBMO Growth ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
