Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Sell
49
MGRW.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.90
Seasonality move
:
2.95%
Day range:
$28.90 - $28.90
52-week range:
$24.17 - $29.61
Dividend yield:
1.92%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1K
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
20.07%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGRO.TO
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBAL.TO
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VGRO.TO
Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF
|
$28.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 1.92% | -- |
|
CGRO.TO
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
$24.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 1.81% | -- |
|
TBAL.TO
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$19.01 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 2.53% | -- |
|
VGRO.TO
Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio
|
$37.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 2.02% | -- |
|
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio
|
$30.50 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 2% | -- |
|
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF
|
$45.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 1.92% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.391 | -- | -- |
|
CGRO.TO
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.234 | -- | -- |
|
TBAL.TO
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.476 | -- | -- |
|
VGRO.TO
Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.566 | -- | -- |
|
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.593 | -- | -- |
|
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.527 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGRO.TO
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBAL.TO
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VGRO.TO
Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MGRW.TO or CGRO.TO?
CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF-- -- -- CGRO.TOCI Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MGRW.TO or CGRO.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF is more attractive than CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF0 0 0 CGRO.TOCI Growth Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is MGRW.TO or CGRO.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGRW.TO or CGRO.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGRW.TO or CGRO.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for CI Growth Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- CGRO.TOCI Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MGRW.TO or TBAL.TO?
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat TD Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF-- -- -- TBAL.TOTD Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MGRW.TO or TBAL.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TD Balanced ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than TD Balanced ETF Portfolio, analysts believe Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF is more attractive than TD Balanced ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF0 0 0 TBAL.TOTD Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is MGRW.TO or TBAL.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TD Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGRW.TO or TBAL.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. TD Balanced ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TD Balanced ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGRW.TO or TBAL.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TD Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than TD Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TD Balanced ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for TD Balanced ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- TBAL.TOTD Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MGRW.TO or VGRO.TO?
Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF-- -- -- VGRO.TOVanguard Growth ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MGRW.TO or VGRO.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio, analysts believe Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF is more attractive than Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF0 0 0 VGRO.TOVanguard Growth ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is MGRW.TO or VGRO.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.483%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGRW.TO or VGRO.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGRW.TO or VGRO.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- VGRO.TOVanguard Growth ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MGRW.TO or XGRO.TO?
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF-- -- -- XGRO.TOiShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MGRW.TO or XGRO.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio, analysts believe Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF0 0 0 XGRO.TOiShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is MGRW.TO or XGRO.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.804%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGRW.TO or XGRO.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGRW.TO or XGRO.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- XGRO.TOiShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MGRW.TO or ZGRO.TO?
BMO Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF-- -- -- ZGRO.TOBMO Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MGRW.TO or ZGRO.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Growth ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF is more attractive than BMO Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF0 0 0 ZGRO.TOBMO Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is MGRW.TO or ZGRO.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Growth ETF has a beta of 0.685, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.506%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGRW.TO or ZGRO.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. BMO Growth ETF offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGRW.TO or ZGRO.TO?
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGRW.TOMackenzie Growth Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- ZGRO.TOBMO Growth ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 20.59% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 19.13% over the past day.
