Financhill
Buy
77

HUBL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$14.73
Seasonality move :
-1.97%
Day range:
$14.49 - $14.76
52-week range:
$10.22 - $14.76
Dividend yield:
8.15%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
16K
Avg. volume:
3.3K
1-year change:
9.44%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
HUBL.TO
Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
-- -- -- -- --
BFIN.TO
Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF
-- -- -- -- --
CALL.TO
Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged
-- -- -- -- --
FSF.TO
CI Global Financial Sector ETF
-- -- -- -- --
XUSF.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
-- -- -- -- --
ZWK.TO
BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
HUBL.TO
Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
$14.72 -- -- -- $0.10 8.15% --
BFIN.TO
Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF
$27.73 -- -- -- $0.13 5.37% --
CALL.TO
Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged
$14.45 -- -- -- $0.13 10.38% --
FSF.TO
CI Global Financial Sector ETF
$36.49 -- -- -- $0.15 1.28% --
XUSF.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
$81.73 -- -- -- $0.18 0.76% --
ZWK.TO
BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF
$27.34 -- -- -- $0.15 6.36% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
HUBL.TO
Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
-- 1.754 -- --
BFIN.TO
Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF
-- 1.309 -- --
CALL.TO
Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged
-- 1.811 -- --
FSF.TO
CI Global Financial Sector ETF
-- 0.930 -- --
XUSF.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
-- 1.035 -- --
ZWK.TO
BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF
-- 1.849 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
HUBL.TO
Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
-- -- -- -- -- --
BFIN.TO
Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
CALL.TO
Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged
-- -- -- -- -- --
FSF.TO
CI Global Financial Sector ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
XUSF.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
ZWK.TO
BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --

Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns HUBL.TO or BFIN.TO?

    Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's net margin of --. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's return on equity of -- beat Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    HUBL.TO
    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
    -- -- --
    BFIN.TO
    Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About HUBL.TO or BFIN.TO?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has higher upside potential than Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF, analysts believe Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A is more attractive than Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    HUBL.TO
    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
    0 0 0
    BFIN.TO
    Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is HUBL.TO or BFIN.TO More Risky?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a beta of 1.455, which suggesting that the stock is 45.518% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.904%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock HUBL.TO or BFIN.TO?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.15%. Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF offers a yield of 5.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios HUBL.TO or BFIN.TO?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF quarterly revenues of --. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's net income of -- is lower than Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF's net income of --. Notably, Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A is -- versus -- for Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    HUBL.TO
    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
    -- -- -- --
    BFIN.TO
    Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns HUBL.TO or CALL.TO?

    Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged has a net margin of -- compared to Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's net margin of --. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's return on equity of -- beat Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    HUBL.TO
    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
    -- -- --
    CALL.TO
    Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About HUBL.TO or CALL.TO?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has higher upside potential than Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged, analysts believe Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A is more attractive than Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    HUBL.TO
    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
    0 0 0
    CALL.TO
    Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged
    0 0 0
  • Is HUBL.TO or CALL.TO More Risky?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a beta of 1.455, which suggesting that the stock is 45.518% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged has a beta of 1.474, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.398%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock HUBL.TO or CALL.TO?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.15%. Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged offers a yield of 10.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios HUBL.TO or CALL.TO?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged quarterly revenues of --. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's net income of -- is lower than Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged's net income of --. Notably, Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A is -- versus -- for Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    HUBL.TO
    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
    -- -- -- --
    CALL.TO
    Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns HUBL.TO or FSF.TO?

    CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's net margin of --. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's return on equity of -- beat CI Global Financial Sector ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    HUBL.TO
    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
    -- -- --
    FSF.TO
    CI Global Financial Sector ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About HUBL.TO or FSF.TO?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Global Financial Sector ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has higher upside potential than CI Global Financial Sector ETF, analysts believe Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A is more attractive than CI Global Financial Sector ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    HUBL.TO
    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
    0 0 0
    FSF.TO
    CI Global Financial Sector ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is HUBL.TO or FSF.TO More Risky?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a beta of 1.455, which suggesting that the stock is 45.518% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.545%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock HUBL.TO or FSF.TO?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.15%. CI Global Financial Sector ETF offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Global Financial Sector ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios HUBL.TO or FSF.TO?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Global Financial Sector ETF quarterly revenues of --. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's net income of -- is lower than CI Global Financial Sector ETF's net income of --. Notably, Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Global Financial Sector ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A is -- versus -- for CI Global Financial Sector ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    HUBL.TO
    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
    -- -- -- --
    FSF.TO
    CI Global Financial Sector ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns HUBL.TO or XUSF.TO?

    iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's net margin of --. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's return on equity of -- beat iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    HUBL.TO
    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
    -- -- --
    XUSF.TO
    iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About HUBL.TO or XUSF.TO?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has higher upside potential than iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF, analysts believe Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A is more attractive than iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    HUBL.TO
    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
    0 0 0
    XUSF.TO
    iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is HUBL.TO or XUSF.TO More Risky?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a beta of 1.455, which suggesting that the stock is 45.518% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock HUBL.TO or XUSF.TO?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.15%. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF offers a yield of 0.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios HUBL.TO or XUSF.TO?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's net income of -- is lower than iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A is -- versus -- for iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    HUBL.TO
    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
    -- -- -- --
    XUSF.TO
    iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns HUBL.TO or ZWK.TO?

    BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's net margin of --. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's return on equity of -- beat BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    HUBL.TO
    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
    -- -- --
    ZWK.TO
    BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About HUBL.TO or ZWK.TO?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has higher upside potential than BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF, analysts believe Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A is more attractive than BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    HUBL.TO
    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
    0 0 0
    ZWK.TO
    BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is HUBL.TO or ZWK.TO More Risky?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a beta of 1.455, which suggesting that the stock is 45.518% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF has a beta of 1.261, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.099%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock HUBL.TO or ZWK.TO?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.15%. BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF offers a yield of 6.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios HUBL.TO or ZWK.TO?

    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF quarterly revenues of --. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's net income of -- is lower than BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF's net income of --. Notably, Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A is -- versus -- for BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    HUBL.TO
    Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
    -- -- -- --
    ZWK.TO
    BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?

Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…

Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?

Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…

Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?

Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
60
AAOI alert for Dec 24

Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 5.1% over the past day.

Buy
85
HUT alert for Dec 24

Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.65% over the past day.

Buy
63
GPCR alert for Dec 24

Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.36% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock