Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
57
XUSF.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$81.61
Seasonality move
:
10.39%
Day range:
$81.73 - $81.73
52-week range:
$64.50 - $81.80
Dividend yield:
0.75%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
19
Avg. volume:
319
1-year change:
8.38%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XUSF.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BKCC.TO
Global X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCA.TO
Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HXF.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XUSF.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
|
$81.99 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 0.75% | -- |
|
BKCC.TO
Global X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF
|
$16.87 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 10.34% | -- |
|
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged
|
$15.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 10.1% | -- |
|
HCA.TO
Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF
|
$33.66 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 3.42% | -- |
|
HXF.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF
|
$114.01 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
|
$58.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 2.92% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XUSF.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
|
-- | 1.035 | -- | -- |
|
BKCC.TO
Global X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF
|
-- | 0.792 | -- | -- |
|
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged
|
-- | 0.482 | -- | -- |
|
HCA.TO
Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF
|
-- | 1.175 | -- | -- |
|
HXF.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF
|
-- | 0.950 | -- | -- |
|
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
|
-- | 1.111 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XUSF.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BKCC.TO
Global X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCA.TO
Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HXF.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns XUSF.TO or BKCC.TO?
Global X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's net margin of --. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF-- -- -- BKCC.TOGlobal X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XUSF.TO or BKCC.TO?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF, analysts believe iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF is more attractive than Global X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF0 0 0 BKCC.TOGlobal X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF0 0 0 -
Is XUSF.TO or BKCC.TO More Risky?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.952, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.836%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XUSF.TO or BKCC.TO?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. Global X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF offers a yield of 10.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XUSF.TO or BKCC.TO?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF-- -- -- -- BKCC.TOGlobal X Equal Weight Can Bank Covered Call ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XUSF.TO or EBNK.TO?
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged has a net margin of -- compared to iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's net margin of --. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF-- -- -- EBNK.TOEvolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XUSF.TO or EBNK.TO?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has higher upside potential than Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged, analysts believe iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF is more attractive than Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF0 0 0 EBNK.TOEvolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged0 0 0 -
Is XUSF.TO or EBNK.TO More Risky?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XUSF.TO or EBNK.TO?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged offers a yield of 10.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XUSF.TO or EBNK.TO?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged quarterly revenues of --. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged's net income of --. Notably, iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF is -- versus -- for Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF-- -- -- -- EBNK.TOEvolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XUSF.TO or HCA.TO?
Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's net margin of --. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF-- -- -- HCA.TOHamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XUSF.TO or HCA.TO?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has higher upside potential than Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF, analysts believe iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF is more attractive than Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF0 0 0 HCA.TOHamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is XUSF.TO or HCA.TO More Risky?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF has a beta of 1.163, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.281%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XUSF.TO or HCA.TO?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF offers a yield of 3.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XUSF.TO or HCA.TO?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF is -- versus -- for Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF-- -- -- -- HCA.TOHamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XUSF.TO or HXF.TO?
Global X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's net margin of --. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF-- -- -- HXF.TOGlobal X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XUSF.TO or HXF.TO?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has higher upside potential than Global X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF, analysts believe iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF is more attractive than Global X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF0 0 0 HXF.TOGlobal X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF0 0 0 -
Is XUSF.TO or HXF.TO More Risky?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF has a beta of 1.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.153%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XUSF.TO or HXF.TO?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. Global X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XUSF.TO or HXF.TO?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF is -- versus -- for Global X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF-- -- -- -- HXF.TOGlobal X S&P/TSX Cppd Fnl Index Corp Cl ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XUSF.TO or ZEB.TO?
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's net margin of --. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF-- -- -- ZEB.TOBMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XUSF.TO or ZEB.TO?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF, analysts believe iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF is more attractive than BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF0 0 0 ZEB.TOBMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is XUSF.TO or ZEB.TO More Risky?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF has a beta of 1.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.034%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XUSF.TO or ZEB.TO?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XUSF.TO or ZEB.TO?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF-- -- -- -- ZEB.TOBMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 29
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is down 12.13% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 29
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 27.67% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 29
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is up 11.94% over the past day.
