Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
82
FSF.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$36.58
Seasonality move
:
7.23%
Day range:
$36.33 - $36.33
52-week range:
$27.71 - $36.33
Dividend yield:
1.28%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
80
1-year change:
20.05%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSF.TO
CI Global Financial Sector ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BFIN.TO
Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HFG.TO
Hamilton Global Financials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HUBL.TO
Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XUSF.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSF.TO
CI Global Financial Sector ETF
|
$36.49 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 1.28% | -- |
|
BFIN.TO
Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF
|
$27.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 5.37% | -- |
|
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged
|
$15.93 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 10.01% | -- |
|
HFG.TO
Hamilton Global Financials ETF
|
$33.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 2.54% | -- |
|
HUBL.TO
Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
|
$14.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 8.15% | -- |
|
XUSF.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
|
$81.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 0.76% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSF.TO
CI Global Financial Sector ETF
|
-- | 0.930 | -- | -- |
|
BFIN.TO
Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF
|
-- | 1.309 | -- | -- |
|
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged
|
-- | 0.482 | -- | -- |
|
HFG.TO
Hamilton Global Financials ETF
|
-- | 0.722 | -- | -- |
|
HUBL.TO
Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
|
-- | 1.754 | -- | -- |
|
XUSF.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
|
-- | 1.035 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSF.TO
CI Global Financial Sector ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BFIN.TO
Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HFG.TO
Hamilton Global Financials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HUBL.TO
Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XUSF.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Global Financial Sector ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FSF.TO or BFIN.TO?
Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Financial Sector ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Financial Sector ETF's return on equity of -- beat Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSF.TOCI Global Financial Sector ETF-- -- -- BFIN.TOBrompton North American Financials Dividend ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FSF.TO or BFIN.TO?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Financial Sector ETF has higher upside potential than Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF, analysts believe CI Global Financial Sector ETF is more attractive than Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSF.TOCI Global Financial Sector ETF0 0 0 BFIN.TOBrompton North American Financials Dividend ETF0 0 0 -
Is FSF.TO or BFIN.TO More Risky?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.904%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSF.TO or BFIN.TO?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF offers a yield of 5.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. CI Global Financial Sector ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSF.TO or BFIN.TO?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Financial Sector ETF's net income of -- is lower than Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Financial Sector ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Financial Sector ETF is -- versus -- for Brompton North American Financials Dividend ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSF.TOCI Global Financial Sector ETF-- -- -- -- BFIN.TOBrompton North American Financials Dividend ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSF.TO or EBNK.TO?
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Financial Sector ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Financial Sector ETF's return on equity of -- beat Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSF.TOCI Global Financial Sector ETF-- -- -- EBNK.TOEvolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FSF.TO or EBNK.TO?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Financial Sector ETF has higher upside potential than Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged, analysts believe CI Global Financial Sector ETF is more attractive than Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSF.TOCI Global Financial Sector ETF0 0 0 EBNK.TOEvolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged0 0 0 -
Is FSF.TO or EBNK.TO More Risky?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSF.TO or EBNK.TO?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged offers a yield of 10.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. CI Global Financial Sector ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSF.TO or EBNK.TO?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Financial Sector ETF's net income of -- is lower than Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Financial Sector ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Financial Sector ETF is -- versus -- for Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSF.TOCI Global Financial Sector ETF-- -- -- -- EBNK.TOEvolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSF.TO or HFG.TO?
Hamilton Global Financials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Financial Sector ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Financial Sector ETF's return on equity of -- beat Hamilton Global Financials ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSF.TOCI Global Financial Sector ETF-- -- -- HFG.TOHamilton Global Financials ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FSF.TO or HFG.TO?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hamilton Global Financials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Financial Sector ETF has higher upside potential than Hamilton Global Financials ETF, analysts believe CI Global Financial Sector ETF is more attractive than Hamilton Global Financials ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSF.TOCI Global Financial Sector ETF0 0 0 HFG.TOHamilton Global Financials ETF0 0 0 -
Is FSF.TO or HFG.TO More Risky?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Global Financials ETF has a beta of 0.982, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.816%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSF.TO or HFG.TO?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. Hamilton Global Financials ETF offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. CI Global Financial Sector ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Global Financials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSF.TO or HFG.TO?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hamilton Global Financials ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Financial Sector ETF's net income of -- is lower than Hamilton Global Financials ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Financial Sector ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hamilton Global Financials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Financial Sector ETF is -- versus -- for Hamilton Global Financials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSF.TOCI Global Financial Sector ETF-- -- -- -- HFG.TOHamilton Global Financials ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSF.TO or HUBL.TO?
Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Financial Sector ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Financial Sector ETF's return on equity of -- beat Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSF.TOCI Global Financial Sector ETF-- -- -- HUBL.TOHarvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FSF.TO or HUBL.TO?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Financial Sector ETF has higher upside potential than Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A, analysts believe CI Global Financial Sector ETF is more attractive than Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSF.TOCI Global Financial Sector ETF0 0 0 HUBL.TOHarvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A0 0 0 -
Is FSF.TO or HUBL.TO More Risky?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.518%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSF.TO or HUBL.TO?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A offers a yield of 8.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. CI Global Financial Sector ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSF.TO or HUBL.TO?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Financial Sector ETF's net income of -- is lower than Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Financial Sector ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Financial Sector ETF is -- versus -- for Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSF.TOCI Global Financial Sector ETF-- -- -- -- HUBL.TOHarvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF Class A-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSF.TO or XUSF.TO?
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Financial Sector ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Financial Sector ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSF.TOCI Global Financial Sector ETF-- -- -- XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FSF.TO or XUSF.TO?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Financial Sector ETF has higher upside potential than iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF, analysts believe CI Global Financial Sector ETF is more attractive than iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSF.TOCI Global Financial Sector ETF0 0 0 XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is FSF.TO or XUSF.TO More Risky?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSF.TO or XUSF.TO?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF offers a yield of 0.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. CI Global Financial Sector ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSF.TO or XUSF.TO?
CI Global Financial Sector ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Financial Sector ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Financial Sector ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Financial Sector ETF is -- versus -- for iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSF.TOCI Global Financial Sector ETF-- -- -- -- XUSF.TOiShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
85
HUT alert for Dec 24
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.65% over the past day.
Buy
63
GPCR alert for Dec 24
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.36% over the past day.
Sell
32
SMX alert for Dec 24
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 8.94% over the past day.
