Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Buy
55
GLO.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.75
Seasonality move
:
-5.64%
Day range:
$0.65 - $0.75
52-week range:
$0.43 - $1.06
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
25.50x
P/S ratio:
193.93x
P/B ratio:
1.02x
Volume:
16M
Avg. volume:
2.2M
1-year change:
-2.6%
Market cap:
$305.8M
Revenue:
$859.3K
EPS (TTM):
-$0.01
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GLO.TO
Global Atomic Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $1.75 |
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -$0.10 | -- | -- | -- |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $1.7500 |
|
GURN.CX
Global Uranium Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KIP.V
Kiplin Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSIL.CX
Pacifica Silver Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GLO.TO
Global Atomic Corp.
|
$0.75 | $1.75 | $305.8M | 25.50x | $0.00 | 0% | 193.93x |
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
$3.45 | -- | $49.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
$0.3150 | $1.7500 | $77.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GURN.CX
Global Uranium Corp.
|
$0.13 | -- | $7.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
KIP.V
Kiplin Metals, Inc.
|
$0.28 | -- | $3.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PSIL.CX
Pacifica Silver Corp.
|
$1.79 | -- | $108.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GLO.TO
Global Atomic Corp.
|
1.9% | 1.127 | 2.19% | 0.17x |
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
0.02% | 15.046 | 0.01% | 2.44x |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
-- | -2.201 | -- | 7.86x |
|
GURN.CX
Global Uranium Corp.
|
2.41% | 0.095 | 0.24% | 0.85x |
|
KIP.V
Kiplin Metals, Inc.
|
-- | 2.233 | -- | 176.95x |
|
PSIL.CX
Pacifica Silver Corp.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GLO.TO
Global Atomic Corp.
|
$318.4K | -$1.1M | -1.64% | -1.68% | -305.25% | -$23.6M |
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -$3.2M | -13.54% | -13.83% | -- | -$4.1M |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
-- | -$504.5K | -9.77% | -9.77% | -- | -$1.7M |
|
GURN.CX
Global Uranium Corp.
|
-- | -$1.1M | -544.88% | -557.44% | -- | -$1M |
|
KIP.V
Kiplin Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$48K | -8.94% | -8.94% | -- | -$20.6K |
|
PSIL.CX
Pacifica Silver Corp.
|
-- | -$199.3K | -- | -- | -- | -$62.4K |
Global Atomic Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GLO.TO or FAT.CX?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a net margin of -7098.77% compared to Global Atomic Corp.'s net margin of --. Global Atomic Corp.'s return on equity of -1.68% beat Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.86.15% $0.02 $305.6M FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -$0.21 $32.9M -
What do Analysts Say About GLO.TO or FAT.CX?
Global Atomic Corp. has a consensus price target of $1.75, signalling upside risk potential of 133.33%. On the other hand Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Atomic Corp. has higher upside potential than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd., analysts believe Global Atomic Corp. is more attractive than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.2 0 0 FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is GLO.TO or FAT.CX More Risky?
Global Atomic Corp. has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.377% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.898, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.756%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLO.TO or FAT.CX?
Global Atomic Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Atomic Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GLO.TO or FAT.CX?
Global Atomic Corp. quarterly revenues are $369.6K, which are larger than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Global Atomic Corp.'s net income of $5.5M is higher than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Global Atomic Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.50x while Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Atomic Corp. is 193.93x versus -- for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.193.93x 25.50x $369.6K $5.5M FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- -- -$2.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns GLO.TO or FSY.TO?
Forsys Metals Corp. has a net margin of -7098.77% compared to Global Atomic Corp.'s net margin of --. Global Atomic Corp.'s return on equity of -1.68% beat Forsys Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -9.77%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.86.15% $0.02 $305.6M FSY.TOForsys Metals Corp.-- -$0.00 $25.9M -
What do Analysts Say About GLO.TO or FSY.TO?
Global Atomic Corp. has a consensus price target of $1.75, signalling upside risk potential of 133.33%. On the other hand Forsys Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.7500 which suggests that it could grow by 455.56%. Given that Forsys Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than Global Atomic Corp., analysts believe Forsys Metals Corp. is more attractive than Global Atomic Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.2 0 0 FSY.TOForsys Metals Corp.1 0 0 -
Is GLO.TO or FSY.TO More Risky?
Global Atomic Corp. has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.377% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forsys Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.315%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLO.TO or FSY.TO?
Global Atomic Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forsys Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Atomic Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forsys Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GLO.TO or FSY.TO?
Global Atomic Corp. quarterly revenues are $369.6K, which are larger than Forsys Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Global Atomic Corp.'s net income of $5.5M is higher than Forsys Metals Corp.'s net income of -$547.6K. Notably, Global Atomic Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.50x while Forsys Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Atomic Corp. is 193.93x versus -- for Forsys Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.193.93x 25.50x $369.6K $5.5M FSY.TOForsys Metals Corp.-- -- -- -$547.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns GLO.TO or GURN.CX?
Global Uranium Corp. has a net margin of -7098.77% compared to Global Atomic Corp.'s net margin of --. Global Atomic Corp.'s return on equity of -1.68% beat Global Uranium Corp.'s return on equity of -557.44%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.86.15% $0.02 $305.6M GURN.CXGlobal Uranium Corp.-- -$0.02 $810.6K -
What do Analysts Say About GLO.TO or GURN.CX?
Global Atomic Corp. has a consensus price target of $1.75, signalling upside risk potential of 133.33%. On the other hand Global Uranium Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Atomic Corp. has higher upside potential than Global Uranium Corp., analysts believe Global Atomic Corp. is more attractive than Global Uranium Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.2 0 0 GURN.CXGlobal Uranium Corp.0 0 0 -
Is GLO.TO or GURN.CX More Risky?
Global Atomic Corp. has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.377% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Uranium Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLO.TO or GURN.CX?
Global Atomic Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Uranium Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Atomic Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Uranium Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GLO.TO or GURN.CX?
Global Atomic Corp. quarterly revenues are $369.6K, which are larger than Global Uranium Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Global Atomic Corp.'s net income of $5.5M is higher than Global Uranium Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Global Atomic Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.50x while Global Uranium Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Atomic Corp. is 193.93x versus -- for Global Uranium Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.193.93x 25.50x $369.6K $5.5M GURN.CXGlobal Uranium Corp.-- -- -- -$1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns GLO.TO or KIP.V?
Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a net margin of -7098.77% compared to Global Atomic Corp.'s net margin of --. Global Atomic Corp.'s return on equity of -1.68% beat Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.94%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.86.15% $0.02 $305.6M KIP.VKiplin Metals, Inc.-- -$0.00 $1.3M -
What do Analysts Say About GLO.TO or KIP.V?
Global Atomic Corp. has a consensus price target of $1.75, signalling upside risk potential of 133.33%. On the other hand Kiplin Metals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Atomic Corp. has higher upside potential than Kiplin Metals, Inc., analysts believe Global Atomic Corp. is more attractive than Kiplin Metals, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.2 0 0 KIP.VKiplin Metals, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is GLO.TO or KIP.V More Risky?
Global Atomic Corp. has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.377% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.024, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.613%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLO.TO or KIP.V?
Global Atomic Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kiplin Metals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Atomic Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kiplin Metals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GLO.TO or KIP.V?
Global Atomic Corp. quarterly revenues are $369.6K, which are larger than Kiplin Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Global Atomic Corp.'s net income of $5.5M is higher than Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$42K. Notably, Global Atomic Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.50x while Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Atomic Corp. is 193.93x versus -- for Kiplin Metals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.193.93x 25.50x $369.6K $5.5M KIP.VKiplin Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$42K
-
Which has Higher Returns GLO.TO or PSIL.CX?
Pacifica Silver Corp. has a net margin of -7098.77% compared to Global Atomic Corp.'s net margin of --. Global Atomic Corp.'s return on equity of -1.68% beat Pacifica Silver Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.86.15% $0.02 $305.6M PSIL.CXPacifica Silver Corp.-- -$0.01 -- -
What do Analysts Say About GLO.TO or PSIL.CX?
Global Atomic Corp. has a consensus price target of $1.75, signalling upside risk potential of 133.33%. On the other hand Pacifica Silver Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Atomic Corp. has higher upside potential than Pacifica Silver Corp., analysts believe Global Atomic Corp. is more attractive than Pacifica Silver Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.2 0 0 PSIL.CXPacifica Silver Corp.0 0 0 -
Is GLO.TO or PSIL.CX More Risky?
Global Atomic Corp. has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.377% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacifica Silver Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLO.TO or PSIL.CX?
Global Atomic Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pacifica Silver Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Atomic Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacifica Silver Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GLO.TO or PSIL.CX?
Global Atomic Corp. quarterly revenues are $369.6K, which are larger than Pacifica Silver Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Global Atomic Corp.'s net income of $5.5M is higher than Pacifica Silver Corp.'s net income of -$199.9K. Notably, Global Atomic Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.50x while Pacifica Silver Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Atomic Corp. is 193.93x versus -- for Pacifica Silver Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.193.93x 25.50x $369.6K $5.5M PSIL.CXPacifica Silver Corp.-- -- -- -$199.9K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.
