Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
51
GIQG.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$31.36
Seasonality move
:
0.49%
Day range:
$31.36 - $31.36
52-week range:
$23.99 - $34.29
Dividend yield:
0.02%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
813
1-year change:
14.72%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GIQG.TO
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FINO.TO
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LEAD.TO
Evolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LONG.TO
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MNXT.TO
Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCGG.TO
Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GIQG.TO
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged
|
$31.25 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 0.02% | -- |
|
FINO.TO
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series
|
$27.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LEAD.TO
Evolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged
|
$18.86 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 12.06% | -- |
|
LONG.TO
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF
|
$36.87 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 0.27% | -- |
|
MNXT.TO
Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SCGG.TO
Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF
|
$10.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GIQG.TO
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged
|
-- | 0.520 | -- | -- |
|
FINO.TO
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series
|
-- | 0.490 | -- | -- |
|
LEAD.TO
Evolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged
|
-- | 0.034 | -- | -- |
|
LONG.TO
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF
|
-- | 0.430 | -- | -- |
|
MNXT.TO
Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SCGG.TO
Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | 1.162 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GIQG.TO
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FINO.TO
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LEAD.TO
Evolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LONG.TO
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MNXT.TO
Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCGG.TO
Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GIQG.TO or FINO.TO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a net margin of -- compared to Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's net margin of --. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged-- -- -- FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GIQG.TO or FINO.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has higher upside potential than Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series, analysts believe Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged is more attractive than Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged0 0 0 FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series0 0 0 -
Is GIQG.TO or FINO.TO More Risky?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIQG.TO or FINO.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIQG.TO or FINO.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series quarterly revenues of --. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's net income of --. Notably, Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged is -- versus -- for Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged-- -- -- -- FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GIQG.TO or LEAD.TO?
Evolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged has a net margin of -- compared to Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's net margin of --. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Evolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged-- -- -- LEAD.TOEvolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GIQG.TO or LEAD.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has higher upside potential than Evolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged, analysts believe Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged is more attractive than Evolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged0 0 0 LEAD.TOEvolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged0 0 0 -
Is GIQG.TO or LEAD.TO More Risky?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.948, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.242%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIQG.TO or LEAD.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Evolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged offers a yield of 12.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIQG.TO or LEAD.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged quarterly revenues of --. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Evolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged's net income of --. Notably, Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged is -- versus -- for Evolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged-- -- -- -- LEAD.TOEvolve Future Leadership Fund - ETF Hedged-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GIQG.TO or LONG.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's net margin of --. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's return on equity of -- beat CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged-- -- -- LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GIQG.TO or LONG.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has higher upside potential than CI Global Longevity Economy ETF, analysts believe Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged is more attractive than CI Global Longevity Economy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged0 0 0 LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF0 0 0 -
Is GIQG.TO or LONG.TO More Risky?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a beta of 0.602, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.769%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIQG.TO or LONG.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIQG.TO or LONG.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Global Longevity Economy ETF quarterly revenues of --. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's net income of -- is lower than CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net income of --. Notably, Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged is -- versus -- for CI Global Longevity Economy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged-- -- -- -- LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GIQG.TO or MNXT.TO?
Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's net margin of --. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged-- -- -- MNXT.TOMackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GIQG.TO or MNXT.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF, analysts believe Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged is more attractive than Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged0 0 0 MNXT.TOMackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is GIQG.TO or MNXT.TO More Risky?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIQG.TO or MNXT.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIQG.TO or MNXT.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged-- -- -- -- MNXT.TOMackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GIQG.TO or SCGG.TO?
Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's net margin of --. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged-- -- -- SCGG.TOStarlight Global Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GIQG.TO or SCGG.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has higher upside potential than Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF, analysts believe Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged is more attractive than Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged0 0 0 SCGG.TOStarlight Global Growth Fund ETF0 0 0 -
Is GIQG.TO or SCGG.TO More Risky?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIQG.TO or SCGG.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIQG.TO or SCGG.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged is -- versus -- for Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged-- -- -- -- SCGG.TOStarlight Global Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 4
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 4
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 4
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
