Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Sell
33
LONG.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$38.60
Seasonality move
:
2.15%
Day range:
$38.60 - $38.60
52-week range:
$30.66 - $39.95
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
25.9%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LONG.TO
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FINO.TO
Franklin Innovation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FJFG.NO
First Trust JFL Global Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GIQG.TO
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MTAV.TO
Global X Metaverse Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZGQ.TO
BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LONG.TO
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF
|
$38.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 0% | -- |
|
FINO.TO
Franklin Innovation ETF
|
$27.17 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FJFG.NO
First Trust JFL Global Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GIQG.TO
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged
|
$29.83 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 0.09% | -- |
|
MTAV.TO
Global X Metaverse Index ETF
|
$29.78 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ZGQ.TO
BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF
|
$71.01 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 0.93% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LONG.TO
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF
|
-- | 0.471 | -- | -- |
|
FINO.TO
Franklin Innovation ETF
|
-- | -0.097 | -- | -- |
|
FJFG.NO
First Trust JFL Global Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
GIQG.TO
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged
|
-- | 0.009 | -- | -- |
|
MTAV.TO
Global X Metaverse Index ETF
|
-- | 0.164 | -- | -- |
|
ZGQ.TO
BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF
|
-- | 0.229 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LONG.TO
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FINO.TO
Franklin Innovation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FJFG.NO
First Trust JFL Global Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GIQG.TO
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MTAV.TO
Global X Metaverse Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZGQ.TO
BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LONG.TO or FINO.TO?
Franklin Innovation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin Innovation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- FINO.TOFranklin Innovation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LONG.TO or FINO.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin Innovation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin Innovation ETF, analysts believe CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is more attractive than Franklin Innovation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF0 0 0 FINO.TOFranklin Innovation ETF0 0 0 -
Is LONG.TO or FINO.TO More Risky?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Innovation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LONG.TO or FINO.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Innovation ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Innovation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LONG.TO or FINO.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin Innovation ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin Innovation ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Innovation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin Innovation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- -- FINO.TOFranklin Innovation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LONG.TO or FJFG.NO?
First Trust JFL Global Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust JFL Global Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- FJFG.NOFirst Trust JFL Global Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LONG.TO or FJFG.NO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust JFL Global Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust JFL Global Equity ETF, analysts believe CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is more attractive than First Trust JFL Global Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF0 0 0 FJFG.NOFirst Trust JFL Global Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is LONG.TO or FJFG.NO More Risky?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust JFL Global Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LONG.TO or FJFG.NO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Trust JFL Global Equity ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust JFL Global Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LONG.TO or FJFG.NO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust JFL Global Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust JFL Global Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust JFL Global Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust JFL Global Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- -- FJFG.NOFirst Trust JFL Global Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LONG.TO or GIQG.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LONG.TO or GIQG.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has higher upside potential than Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged, analysts believe CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is more attractive than Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF0 0 0 GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged0 0 0 -
Is LONG.TO or GIQG.TO More Risky?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LONG.TO or GIQG.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LONG.TO or GIQG.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is -- versus -- for Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- -- GIQG.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Hedged-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LONG.TO or MTAV.TO?
Global X Metaverse Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Metaverse Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- MTAV.TOGlobal X Metaverse Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LONG.TO or MTAV.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Metaverse Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Metaverse Index ETF, analysts believe CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is more attractive than Global X Metaverse Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF0 0 0 MTAV.TOGlobal X Metaverse Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is LONG.TO or MTAV.TO More Risky?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Metaverse Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LONG.TO or MTAV.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global X Metaverse Index ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Metaverse Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LONG.TO or MTAV.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Metaverse Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Metaverse Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Metaverse Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Metaverse Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- -- MTAV.TOGlobal X Metaverse Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LONG.TO or ZGQ.TO?
BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- ZGQ.TOBMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LONG.TO or ZGQ.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has higher upside potential than BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF, analysts believe CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is more attractive than BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF0 0 0 ZGQ.TOBMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is LONG.TO or ZGQ.TO More Risky?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF has a beta of 0.611, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.943%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LONG.TO or ZGQ.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LONG.TO or ZGQ.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is -- versus -- for BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- -- ZGQ.TOBMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 0.13% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 4.89% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 6.84% over the past day.
