Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Sell
42
LONG.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$40.26
Seasonality move
:
6.16%
Day range:
$41.99 - $41.99
52-week range:
$31.51 - $41.99
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
1
1-year change:
1.9%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LONG.TO
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSGE.NO
CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FINO.TO
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MNXT.TO
Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCGG.TO
Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TTTX.TO
Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LONG.TO
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF
|
$40.20 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 0% | -- |
|
CSGE.NO
CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FINO.TO
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series
|
$30.22 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MNXT.TO
Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SCGG.TO
Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF
|
$10.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TTTX.TO
Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A
|
$28.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LONG.TO
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF
|
-- | 0.820 | -- | -- |
|
CSGE.NO
CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
FINO.TO
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series
|
-- | 1.025 | -- | -- |
|
MNXT.TO
Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SCGG.TO
Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
TTTX.TO
Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A
|
-- | 1.018 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LONG.TO
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSGE.NO
CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FINO.TO
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MNXT.TO
Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCGG.TO
Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TTTX.TO
Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LONG.TO or CSGE.NO?
CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's return on equity of -- beat CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- CSGE.NOCIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LONG.TO or CSGE.NO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has higher upside potential than CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF, analysts believe CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is more attractive than CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF0 0 0 CSGE.NOCIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is LONG.TO or CSGE.NO More Risky?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a beta of 0.614, which suggesting that the stock is 38.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LONG.TO or CSGE.NO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LONG.TO or CSGE.NO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net income of -- is lower than CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is -- versus -- for CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- -- CSGE.NOCIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LONG.TO or FINO.TO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LONG.TO or FINO.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series, analysts believe CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is more attractive than Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF0 0 0 FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series0 0 0 -
Is LONG.TO or FINO.TO More Risky?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a beta of 0.614, which suggesting that the stock is 38.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LONG.TO or FINO.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LONG.TO or FINO.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- -- FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LONG.TO or MNXT.TO?
Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- MNXT.TOMackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LONG.TO or MNXT.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF, analysts believe CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is more attractive than Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF0 0 0 MNXT.TOMackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is LONG.TO or MNXT.TO More Risky?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a beta of 0.614, which suggesting that the stock is 38.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LONG.TO or MNXT.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LONG.TO or MNXT.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- -- MNXT.TOMackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LONG.TO or SCGG.TO?
Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- SCGG.TOStarlight Global Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LONG.TO or SCGG.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has higher upside potential than Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF, analysts believe CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is more attractive than Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF0 0 0 SCGG.TOStarlight Global Growth Fund ETF0 0 0 -
Is LONG.TO or SCGG.TO More Risky?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a beta of 0.614, which suggesting that the stock is 38.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LONG.TO or SCGG.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LONG.TO or SCGG.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is -- versus -- for Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- -- SCGG.TOStarlight Global Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LONG.TO or TTTX.TO?
Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- TTTX.TOGlobal X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LONG.TO or TTTX.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A, analysts believe CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is more attractive than Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF0 0 0 TTTX.TOGlobal X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A0 0 0 -
Is LONG.TO or TTTX.TO More Risky?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a beta of 0.614, which suggesting that the stock is 38.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LONG.TO or TTTX.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LONG.TO or TTTX.TO?
CI Global Longevity Economy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Longevity Economy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Longevity Economy ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LONG.TOCI Global Longevity Economy ETF-- -- -- -- TTTX.TOGlobal X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 18.2% over the past day.
Sell
33
ZBIO alert for Dec 16
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 13.35% over the past day.
Sell
38
HUT alert for Dec 16
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 3.92% over the past day.
